enable Javascript in
settings to see Menus
at top
some links especially "in-page" are temporarily broken
PRESENTING evidence of
a TERRORISM RACKET
Absolute*proof* about every single thing about Sept 11 is impossible to obtain.
It's
a piece of cake to prove the official Al-Qaeda theory is bogus. Beyond the "Official 9-11 Tinfoil Conspiracy allegations"
1. USGov staged previous bombings, via proxies. Even the Judge can't deny taped admissions.
2. Govt officials stated in writing in 2000 that we needed to fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars
3. Govt officials stated in writing that they needed a bloodbath in America to start these wars.
Have you never heard of a "Strategy of TENSION".
4. Trillions of dollars and petro-dollars riding on this imperative "War on Terror".
5. Wa-a-a-y more connections between "terrorists" and "govt" than implied.
Bush-BinLaden-Saudis-Carlyle is just one.
6. Alternate enemies - Al-Qaeda, Israel, Saudis, Pakistan - have all been CIA proxies helping covert Al-Qaeda ops.
7. If 15 Saudis really attacked us, why did Bush just give them $30B in weapons, plus offer nuke technology? 8. If I had to answer WHO do I blame for 9-11, I'd list groups that collaborated in the past with Al-Qaeda/Mujahideen, and collaborated in fabricating threats in the past, such as PNAC, Team B,
American Enterprise, Heritage Foundation, Freedom House, CFR, Center
for Security Policy, and many other similar well-funded groups, which
are often interlinked by members and with CIA and other govt agencies,
and which "advise" various puppet Presidents.
Defending America, the Constitution, and the People from crime --- that's Patriotic too!
these pages now being radically updated, some links might be bad
'Thought Crime' Legislation of HR
1955, S 1959 DISCLAIMER
Huey from Boondocks makes a political
statement. (flash video)
DIVX huey911.avi
smaller WMV huey911.wmv
click pause to finish loading movie if your Internet connection is slow and it
breaks up
install Adobe Flash
Player to view some in-page videos or YouTube
This site
name TAKEOVERWORLD is for a joke --
the main site fits on 3 floppy disks.
MONKEYWRENCHING
the hypnosis and disinfo with FACTS and EVIDENCE is NOT a joke.
TIP: When
clicking on Links, try to [Right-Click]
and [Open
in New Window] instead of going forward
and back.
for Javascipt popups
...
just click them and close.
I have preserved some others' webpages as MHTML files, lest they vanish from the Web.
MHT works with Internet Explorer, but Firefox will need this MHT extension.
1993
WTC bombing Let's cut to the chase ...
The
1993 World Trade Center bombing is widely considered the "sister-event" or precedent
for
the 2001 attacks. The
1993 World Trade Center bombing was like the "Opening Salvo" in the War on Terror, Act One of the drama. The 1993 bombing was the first one blamed on a new
group called "Al-Qaeda" by NY Prosecutors.
So let's take a close look at it.
It is ON THE RECORD that the
1993 WTC bombing was planned-and-staged by the FBI. The
court could not throw out FBI agent admissions caught on tape (by the
informant they hired to do it), nor could they simply eliminate the
testimony of other FBI agents' confirming it. The
Judge merely stated that it was a GOOD THING!
The argument was
that the terrorists might have used a worse bomb, if the FBI had not
supplied the explosives. Two problems with that story.
One, the plan for the bombing came from the FBI, not the guys they
arrested.
Two, the "informant" who set the whole thing up, from start to finish, for the FBI, wanted to use FAKE explosivesas the FBI first told him, so nobody would get hurt. It was the FBI supervisor over-and-above the direct contact (Michael Anticev) who insisted on using LIVE explosives.
The informant accused the FBI of "screwing up". He was told basically
to mind his own business, that the FBI supervisor said it was OK.
Mr. Salem is quoted as telling agent Floyd: "Since
the bomb went off I feel terrible. I feel bad. I feel here is people
who don't listen." emad_salem.mp3 (The
arrested and convicted bombers were described as "retarded" -- 70 to 85
IQ -- the one bomber went back to Ryder for his refund after the truck blew up. That factor supports the "too
dumb to have done it on their own" argument.)
But here's the main point again:
What's NOT open to debate is that the FBI planned it.
"an overzealous sting operation"
Orders to use LIVE bombs came from the FBI handlers.
FBI
received written transcripts from their informant, every step of the
way, as the "sting" unfolded. FBI provided the original plan for the bombing, safe house, money, bomb,
truck, and explosives. FBI agents manned the Ryder truck
rental office. The only thing the convicted bombers did was agree to
the FBI's plans and carry them out, not realizing it was an FBI sting. Mohammed A. Salameh did that part wrong, he screwed up on the final instructions on where to park it. Rare TV NEWS report about WTC bombing FBI Foreknowledge Then he went to collect the $400 deposit on the van.
Here's what that huge gaping hole in the official 1993 story looks like, according to "DITTOHEAD CENTRAL", Christian, conservative World Net Daily:
"To make a long, complicated story short
and simple: The FBI spent $3 million of your tax money to blow up the World
Trade Center."
"When will this insanity end? What is the
overall objective of the FBI and
government? Are these activities actually designed to thwart terrorism or
encourage it? Who benefits most from terrorist activity?
[...] Remember this the next time you hear about a so-called
"terrorist incident." [end excerpt]
This is
from a Rush Limbaugh-friendly site, but it's still accurate. It explains the
1995 bombing inside job and other disasters too, in only 727 words. I
love the simplicity. Conservatives know how to get to the
point, without a lot of "liberal blather". (Not dissing you, my liberal friends.)
DON'T LIKE FAR RIGHT, Christian, tabloid news sources? Try this:
Ralph Schoenman- Who Bombed the World Trade Center (1993) with
much more detailwww.takingaimradio.com/articles/wtc93.html Schoenman has what looks like impeccable Left-y credentials and structural & class
analysis that Liberals appreciate. Look at his history. Schoenman
also explains the POLITICAL RAMIFICATIONS and REASONS, something the
9-11 Truth Movement is pretty unclear about, or oversimplifies.
FOR the original NY Times and LA Times articles, click the Chertoff
link below and scroll down to Free Republic, which has them archived.
Which precedent did the 1993 bombing set? The "evil
Islamic terrorists" precedent or the "Arab patsies run by the FBI" precedent?
Who was the crazy Judge over that 1993 bombing trial who said it was "good"? Bush just appointed Judge Michael Mukasey Attorney General of the United States, approved by Democrats. Who were the Prosectors? Patrick
Fitzgerald (Valerie Plame-CIA case) and Rudolph Guiliani. Since the 1993 attack was an FBI-planned-and-staged operation, is it wrong to seriously consider it's
2001 "sister-event" a govt op too? Is the fact that it happened under George W. Bush instead of under Bill Clinton a good excuse to ignore this?? It's not hard to imagine why WND stopped following their own advice after
January 20, 2001, the day of the inauguration, given their editorial makeup and ownership. Thankfully, they
did not scrub the Mad Bombers article from the WND site.
SANDER HICKS (investigator, reporter): Am I the only one who thinks
that it’s creepy that the FBI guy who admitted the FBI knew all about
planes being flown into buildings well before 9/11, Michael Anticev, has the same last name as the FBI agent John Anticev, who handled Emad Salem, the informant who said that the FBI “built the bomb” for the 1993 WTC bombing? “We’re doing this for a higher reason. We know what we’re doing and we know what it’s gonna mean in the future." link to FBI taped admission transcripts
This
article was published at the Jerusalem Post, and on the prestigious
Cato Institute. It is about American Military and Intelligence
trying to develop "new enemies" in the wake of the Cold War, something
to replace the USSR and justify a military budget instead of a
long-awaited "peace dividend" for social services and tax relief.
(Screw that peace dividend. How will Cold Warriors feed their families
without a new threat?) One choice was the Yellow Peril --
the rise of China as an economic giant. That play is still in
motion. The other choice for a new enemy was political Islam.
Shazam! Right on time!!
"We need a
common enemy to unite us." - Condoleeza Rice
in 2000
If
Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in
the guise of
fighting a foreign enemy.
-- James Madison while a
United
States Congressman
This need for a "common enemy" is a common view amongst elites.
It's basic Machiavelli and Leo Strauss. And Hitler.
“A prince must have no other objectives or other thoughts or take anything for his craft, except war.”
including:
DESTRUCTION IN OKLAHOMA CITY 7-30-1995
Benton K. Partin, Brig General (ret) 31-year veteran, commander of the Air Force Armament Technology Lab:
"OK City was inside job".
Taking Aim Radio including - Black
Ops: Signature of the Gangster State, Outing the Gentlemen Killers of
the CIA, Edwin Wilson and the Merchants of Death
THE TERRORIST MONEYMAN - a CIA/Pakistan operative meets in the White House
CIA Rejects Discipline For 9/11 Failures
TWELVE or so FBI AGENTS SCREAMED "OBSTRUCTION"
"Let Bin Laden stay free"
Did U.S. cut deal to let bin Laden stay free? CIA reportedly disbands Bin Laden unit
PROFITS OF DEATH -- INSIDER TRADING AND 9-11
The ‘airlift of evil’ rescuing Al-Qaida from the Mountains
FBI PROTECTS OSAMA BIN LADEN’S “RIGHT TO PRIVACY”
German Court Criticizes U.S. for Withholding Evidence
Sept. 11's Smoking Gun: The Many Faces of Saeed Sheikh
Alleged Hijackers May Have Trained at US Bases
Scoop: UQ Wire: 911 Hijackers Who Lived At A US Navy Base
FBI refused to accept 14,000 incriminating Saudi documents
Pentagon Plan to Provoke Terrorist Attacks - Rumsfeld's P2OG
Permanent War: The Stakes For Working People
TERRORISM AGAINST CUBA -protecting the terrorists, arresting those who reported on them
Here's a good analogy:
Near my wife's corpse,
cops find a note to my lover saying "I MUST find a way to sell my house
and move to Spain with you, but absent the lucky event of my wife's
providential murder, it will be many years before I can leave."
I'm living in Spain with my lover now. Who are the cops going to investigate?
Why would the cops NOT subject me and my lover to intense investigation? I would need a damn good airtight alibi. What if I used political connections to have the cops ORDERED to stop investigating us?
This is not that complicated. Occam's Razor DOES apply to Sept 11 (as an indicator of likelihood). Detectives immediately consider persons closest to the crime "prime suspects", and look for evidence there. Everybody knows that. It's obvious. We've all watched many cop shows.We have common sense.
The
fact that NOBODY in the media or FBI or 9-11 Commission or govt has
made this simple, obvious observation -- and they act like it's the craziest idea to even think this -- this is a strong clue that
something about this STINKS!!! "Lt. Colombo" would be all over these suspects, for their pretentious denial, if nothing else.
PROXY FORCES, such as Al-Qaeda
There is plenty of evidence that Al-Qaeda DOES exist, but clearly as a proxy force of US elites' foreign policy.
The USgov has used proxy forces for decades, for covert and overt
military operations, with US funding, arming, training, but minimizing
use of US troops as much as possible. It's easier and cheaper to hire
mercenaries. Al-Qaeda
was a US/CIA proxy to provoke/fight the Soviet Union. Various
Islamic radical groups like the Taliban and generic mujahideen were covertly sponsored by the US to stamp out
socialism in the Middle East. Socialism takes a cut out of Wall Street's profits,
and profits of other global investors linked to Wall Street, such as US
and Western corps, but also the Saudis, Kuwaitis, Dubai, Turkish
investors, etc. Violent radical Islamists are not only anti-social, they're anti-socialist!!! This is what was seen as good or useful about them.
Al-Qaeda remained a US proxy. OBL
and Al-Qaeda and the Saudis and Israeli Mossad and Pakistani ISI have been "in
bed" with the military, the CIA, the White House, British Intell, and the Bush family
for decades. This next part sounds anti-Clinton and it is, but what is described here is BI-PARTISAN policy continued by the Bush Jr. administration.
Now this next one is LaRouche, but it seems to fit in with the United States Senate version above
Bin Laden Puppetmasters Smoked Out In BalkansNovember 9, 2001-The mid-October revelations that an Osama bin Laden terrorist training camp is operating in the U.S.-controlled zone of Kosovo, are only the tip of the iceberg.
The point
being that Al-Qaeda cannot be a paid partner of the Pentagon/CIA and a
longstanding outside enemy at the exact same time.
Al-Qaeda LIES
Path to 9/11 Obscures Real
Terror Network
NOTE: REPUBLICANS avoided mentioning their own scalding ANTI-CLINTON info in the mainstream. Why? They didn't want themselves to get burned. Republicans arranging the "Path to 9-11" documentary on Clinton did not mention this as Treason,
only accused Clinton of incompetence and timidity, plus being a pervert and liar.
Bush unilaterally granted Kosovo independent statehood in 2008, ignoring
longstanding post-war European treaties.
Even a pro-Zionist pro-Israel Muslim interviewed by pro-Israel "Instapundit" and featured on Front Page Mag criticizes Bush for inviting Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah
to his Texas ranch after 9-11, calling him an ally in the struggle
against terror. "Now, that man is - from the very beginning - the real mastermind behind al-Qa'idah,
and the one who used al-Qa'idah to hospitalize King Fahd and to become
the de facto ruler of the country. That is like inviting the Emperor of
Japan after Pearl Harbor, and telling him, "You are our ally in the
struggle against Nazi-Fascism."
History
has been severely whitewashed. School NEVER taught about Wall
Street support for the Nazis (really almost 'creating' them) and the
attempted Fascist coup in America in 1933, the same year Hitler seized power, by Wall Street hiring a private proxy army, exposed by Marine Commandant
Gen. Smedley Butler, then whitewashed by Congressional hearings.
How is THAT controversy not a significant school lesson? If we don't even know about that, you must ask yourself what else we are not told.
Hitler and the Nazis
were a Wall St proxy to attack the USSR, sponsored by Sullivan and
Cromwell law firm and other major, famous US corporations. Wall Street bankers were
acting as a "rogue" and "underground" foreign policy vehicle for
capitalism, before they formed the CIA and made it "legal".
The entire S. Vietnam govtwas a
proxy for US interests in Asia. Eisenhower said 80% would have
voted for Ho Chi Minh (with a Constitution similar to the US), so
Washington cancelled elections in Vietnam and created an opposition.
The forces of S. Korea
were fascist military dictators, a US proxy, working with Japanese and
Taiwan fascists brought in by Washington after Hiroshima and Japan's
surrender. Colombian govt & paramilitary are a US mil proxy, WaPo finally admitted they are the source of cocaine, not stopping cocaine. Contras in Nicaragua (including Honduran mercenaries) were Bush's and Ollie North's coke-funded proxy. Batallion 316 was a US proxy force in Latin America, Guatemala, Bolivia, Honduras. (Killing Hope, by William Blum) WACL
is a group that organizes proxy forces to fight "communism" (poor
people), constructed out of a global fascist post-WW2 underground. Their US home is at The Heritage Foundation. Al-Qaeda has been called the M.E. version of a WACL proxy. The
Hungarian Uprising was staged by the CIA, by Cord Meyer. Meyer also formed
the "communist" World Federation. Similar deal with the "Color
Revolutions" in Eastern Europe in the 1990s. Saddam Hussein was a CIA proxy, going back to the late 1950s, to kill liberals and to topple/kill Gen Qassem, who had the gall to declare neutrality with the USSR and re-open diplomatic relations. Bad Qassem! Yer dead.
Mossadegh in Iran was overthrown using a street proxy group organized by Kermit Roosevelt with $10,000 from the CIA, installing the Shah and SAVAK, who were basically US and Israeli proxy forces. Cheapest coup in history, then. Bush is CURRENTLY indirectly paying Fatah-al-Islam in Lebanon, according to Seymour Hersh (below). Israel
is arguably a US proxy, although a very embedded one. Israel has some
400+ nukes, the US has 10,000+ nukes, and a vastly, immensely larger military
budget. Israel's Mossad (Intell) was formed with help of Angleton of the CIA in 1951.
Mossad and CIA have conducted many joint operations over the years,
including arming and training death squads in Latin America. Saudi Arabia's and Pakistan's
govt and specifically Intelligence were known and admitted proxies for
manufacturing the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, on behalf of the CIA. Al-Qaeda is outsourced terrorism,
outsourced US policy, really a variety of small groups referrred to by that name, but
often blamed on Muslims as a WHOLE, as an excuse for war for a "New
American Century" of global control by US/global elites. Most Al-Qaeda
foot soldiers probably think they're really fighting for
Islam, don't know their role for the West, no more than patriotic
American soldiers realize how they are being used, or for what
purposes. The "Al-Qaeda" hijackers were mostly NOT
religious, but rather they were described as party boys.
J Edgar Hoover to FBI field offices laid out the goals of the COINTELPRO
in the 60's - to neutralize dissident organizations and to "ridicule and discredit"
them. local This included targeted
murders as well as public ridicule and propaganda.
"The
first lesson in activism is that the person that offers to get the dynamite is always the FBI
agent,"
joked Judi Bari. Judi
Bari laughingly called this, "the only joint
FBI-Earth First! action ever to take place." Undercover FBI
agents picked the target, drove the truck, and taught the activists to
use an acetylene torch.
The FBI paid their informant $54,000
cash in
exchange for implicating the Earth First-ers, and granted him immunity
from prosecution. (Later, Bari's car blew up, and the FBI
immediately arrested her in her hospital bed for blowing herself up.)
CIA Death Squads
What would stop them from doing here what they've done over there?
A very long article about disinformation, for people already familiar with 9-11.
21 October 2003 Official 9/11 Legend There's
Something About Omar: Truth, Lies, and The Legend of 9/11
by Chaim
Kupferberg http://globalresearch.ca/articles/KUP310A.htm
Dr. Michel Chossudovsky explains the Geo-Politics behind the whole situation. DO NOT attempt to
watch or listen to Chossudovsky without a decent attention span.
He's
a BORING academic lecturer. (Not to me. But he's slow.) He
might remind you of Noam Chomsky. He's an economist. He's
damn good at this.
Most of so-called Sept 11 conspiracy crap is obsessed with mechanical anomalies that don't explain anything. WHAT DOESN'T MATTER ABOUT SEPT 11.
There is MUCH to say about the rational GEOPOLITICS and ECONOMICS behind 9-11 and the War on Terror.
It was pre-planned and foretold, in writing. No mystery. No wondering. No shit. (Keep going.)
The MINUTAE of mechanical evidence plays perfectly into Popular Mechanics' hit piece.
In the world of PUBLIC RELATIONS, who ya gonna believe --
Popular Mechanics and NIST and the 9-11 Commission --
or some tinfoil hat guys and a few rogue scientists?
Most of the anti-Conspiracy talk, on both the Mainstream Right and the "responsible Left", is based on ridicule.
But much of 9-11 Truth is ridiculous and contradictory. Contrary to popular belief, the Left has been far more adverse to a conspiracy view of 9-11 than Conservatives.
Leading politcal icons -- who must know better -- dismiss 9-11-as-conspiracy at face value. Chomsky. Cockburn.
It would be nice if conspiracy itself could simply be ridiculed as impossible.
But Conspiracy is one of the most common charges raised by prosecutors.
It means communicating with others about committing a crime.
Conspiracy can be charged for casually answering the phone in a drug deal.
It would be nice if leaders didn't conspire to fool us with a Gulf of Tonkin incident that they knew never happened.
It would be nice if Operation Gladio never happened and if nobody ever conspired on Operation Northwoods.
It would be nice if the Church Committee never exposed CIA editorial control over the media.
It would be nice if Iran-Contra, a deep and nasty conspiracy, even preceding Reagan's election, never happened.
(It would also be nice if Bush Sr. had not pardoned all those convicted.)
It would be nice if BCCI -- "The International Bank of Al-Qaeda" -- had never been created by ex-CIA.
It would be nice if top Wall Street bankers, lawyers, and corporate heads never backed the Nazis.
It would be nice if Washington had never created Al-Qaeda, and continued to work with them. Saddam - Thanks for the Memories
But this is all part of real history.
What 9-11 is NOT about:
Bush - it's not the argument that "Bush knew".
Nor Cheney. Nor Rumsfeld.
All almost certainly DID know. Many things could not have happened without their input. Conspiracy? Cheney's entire role as VP is a conspiracy in motion.
His energy meetings are secret, his office is off-limits, excluded from Bush's orders.
He's not part of the Executive, because he's over the House. Yet later he's 100% unified with the President.
But 9-11 is part of a military-political process that preceded Bush.
It is Global, not just National. The entire G8 and more is onboard this train.
Other govts - esp Canada, Britain, Germany - implemented their own Terrorism Security Measures, immediately.
These had also been pre-written, just as the PATRIOT Act and the rest had been pre-planned.
"Intelligence partnerships" were announced -- really, these already existed too.
Clinton definitely helped set it up, he was on that track. This is no empty statement.
Bush's 1999 speeches at the Citadel and Reagan Library foreshadowed the War on Terror.
Bush's speeches meshed perfectly with PNAC documents and agenda for global war.
This PNAC agenda became
the Blueprint for the Bush Doctrine and the so-called War on Terror.
Much of the Bush cabinet was made up of PNAC members and associates, some hired/pardoned by Bush 41.
(They picked "W" to be their figurehead President. That's how a corporate military state works.)
It's no longer about voting --- how many tens of thousands did you raise for contributions? None? Well, then ...
How many lucrative jobs and contracts did you offer to public officials and their friends? None?
Why do you expect representation? For you vote? Ha ha. The machines are rigged and privatized.
They don't even need your vote. They do need your belief in the democratic process.
Project for a New American Century was only one embedded policy group that said they NEEDED America to be attacked.
It's much bigger and deeper, many players, domestic and international.
Sept 11 conspiracy
viewpoints first became prominent with RIGHTwing Christian Conservatives
and the Patriot movements.
These were Clinton-haters long before they were Bush-haters, some for the right reasons, including Clintons being "in
bed" with the Bush family. High-level Clinton criminality around Iran-Contra-Ollie North-Cocaine was first exposed by Left-wing activists, before Falwell's
"Chronicles".
The mainstream Right rejects Sept 11 because the MEDIA says it's a "liberal" thing, like "M. Moore" and "Rosie".
The mainstream Left rejects Sept 11 because the MEDIA says it's a "far right" thing like "Holocaust Revisionists".
The mainstream Right accuses PALEO-CONSERVATIVES of being "liberals" if they oppose Bush, War, and the "New World Order".
LIBERALS reject Sept 11 conspiracy research BECAUSE IT'S ASSOCIATED
WITH THE FAR RIGHT and their history of kooky conspiracy theories
emanating from John Birch Society circles and Joseph McCarthy's witchhunts, that
tried to link 60's mainstream liberalism and antiwar activism to communism and
treason.
The book, "The Paranoid Style in American Politics" was written about
FAR RIGHT conspiracy theories over-hyping the threat of
communism.
JBS even accused President Eisenhower of being a closet commie. The Paranoid Right strongly considered JFK a commie, despite his Cold War fanaticism in Cuba and Vietnam. They blamed him for not nuking Russia.
(JFK, shortly before he was killed, did shift from belligerent anti-communism to rapproachment, to avoid a nuclear holocaust.)
But besides the Far Right 9-11 Truthers, there's also a few on the LEFT (non-Mainstream) who have
burrowed into the history and geo-politics with a lot of detail. from a sane
Leftist anti-Imperialist perspective.
Marketing
101: PRESENTATION
When persons with a kooky
presentation associate themselves with a serious political analysis of
Sept
11, "normal" people are driven away by gut instinct.
That's exactly how modern
symbolic marketing works -- like associating a product with sex or love
-- except in reverse.
How do people feel about 9-11
questions after hearing from "Truthers" through a love-drenched
hippie of the "911-yoga movement" or from sneering Jew-haters?
Repulsed, usually. It's
acts as a truth-repellant, without explanation. Some "Truthers" may be ordinary kooks or may have some ulterior motive.
This is exactly what I'd
do if I were
CIA. No need to suppress the
truth. Just marginalize it and offer multiple whacko versions.
Why Sept 11
is still important
The antiwar movement -- if you're not with it yet, you might after you read this page -- has this idea that Sept 11 is a fringe subject. They think this issue should be sidelined. The
Lefties actually suggest getting "Truthers" a job stuffing envelopes or
something to keep them occupied. Don't they realize the entire
war pretext is Sept 11?? They seem to think antiwar sentiment about the victims of war will convince others who believe foremost in "defending America from Al-Qaeda".
The warrior-types can't understand why anyone would be stupid
enough to oppose self-defense against monstrous killers.
If you accept the "19 Terrorists led by Bin Laden attacked us" conspiracy theory,
you just gave up most of your power against the "War on Terror" and
police state. The idea of "our actions caused this" is "nice",
and might persuade some people who know about past harsh repression and violence, and who care
about other people. Not those who say "Look how many times THEY have
attacked us". Sept 11 Truth has more potential power than if
people in 1964 realized that Johnson and everyone around him flat-out LIED about the
Gulf of Tonkin incident. BBC NEWS | Middle East
| Hijack 'suspects' alive and well FBI
Denies Mix-Up Of 9/11 Terrorists
The
stunning news prompted FBI Director Robert Mueller to admit that some
of the hijackers may have stolen identities of innocent citizens. In
September 2002, Mueller told CNN twice that there is "no legal proof to
prove the identities of the suicidal hijackers." After that admission a
strange thing happened - nothing. No follow-up stories. No follow-up
questions. There was dead silence and the story disappeared. It was
almost as if no one wanted to know what had happened. In fact, the FBI
didn't bother to change the names, backgrounds or photographs of the
alleged 19 hijackers. It didn't even deny the news reports suggesting
that the names and identities of at least six of the hijackers may be
unknown. Mueller just left the door open.
Until now. Now the FBI is sticking with its original story - regardless
of whether photographs displayed of the suspected Sept. 11 terrorists
were of people who never boarded those planes and are very much alive.
EVERYTHING
is about 9-11 ... forever!
a] Stop perpetual
war for 100+ years into the
future,
slated to end NEVER. This is based
off Sept 11. This must be derailed.
THEY
say 9-11 is
important, and reference it loudly or by assumption - and the
Establisment "Liberals" (ill-liberals?) agree. How can Americans resist war while accepting it's false justification?
b] Promote
understanding of PSY-WARused
against The
People, psy-op events to Shock and Awe
Americans,
trickery, "public relations", emotional manipulation & blackmail, etc. (A lot of "War on Terror" messaging is a textbook copy of First World War Domestic Propaganda methods. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_in_the_United_States )
Do you remember the ridiculous "Have you forgotten?" theme (meme, i.e.
thought-virus) that emerged immediately,
while the ground
was still smoldering, to shame pacifists, silence
critics, and shame skeptics? Clarification
can counter our gullibility
and prevent war, promote rational skepticism.
(thanks to The Daily Show and Jon Stewart) (Irrational/ridiculous
skepticism is another PR trick to discredit all skeptics.)
c] The ability to CREDIBLY
debunk Sept 11, may help people drop passive support for the
plans of the Military-Industrial-Finance-Corporate-Media-Security-Infotainment
complex. Credibility is
more important than a smorgasbord of valid details. Even if
they think Bush's "War
on Terrorism" is overblown,
or agree with critics that it is a war on a tactic(guerilla
warfare/terrorism), most people still believe that the general
paradigm
of "terrorism by Al-Qaeda" is genuine. This keeps
people
scared, angry, divided, fighting over reality. (Did you know the FBI Wanted poster for OBL does not include Sept 11? Insufficient evidence, per the FBI.)
d] Possibility of "monkeywrenching" the march to totalitarian
global
corporate-state tyranny by loudly rejecting the premise behind the "security
state" (i.e. police
state). They need our compliance.
A new "Official"
9-11 investigation to solve it? Don't hold your breath. It's already solved. Maybe not
every last detail, but close enough. Even prosecutors don't need every detail. Many of
us know
what didnot happen and lots about
what did, but 9-11
will never be honestly exposed in any official national capacity.
By whom?
The guilty will never be brought to justice,
unless our current system is overhauled or overturned. Unless We-the-People get
on
the same page and decide to overthrow the existing power relations, and not just the official government,
all the assorted henchmen have all the power and protection they
need. The Power Elite needed Bush and the Neo-Conservatives to be occupying the head PR position in the United States. Bush bought
100,000 acres in Paraguay, a
typical Nazi hideaway in Latin America. A land investment or a "safe house"?
The real question is where to start.
Let's start with a framework of understanding, before more juicy details. GLOBALIZATION
CORPORATIONS, BANKING, FINANCE -- GLOBAL CORPORATISM
This should be a no-brainer. Everything is about interlinking global corporations now.
If you look back on past American wars, they
were ALL for Corporate Globalization. President McKinley even
said so about the Spanish American War. It as a war to "open up
markets". So were wars and many occupations in Central and South
America, from the earliest beginnings of America on through
today.
By the way, it's not about "liberals hate corporations". Every corporation is a quasi-government entity.
It's not simply a "large company". Someone could incorporate a solo
lemonade stand.
The point is, it's a contract or "charter" that a
company takes, via a relationship and agreements with government, for protection against personal liability, elimination or limitation of personal responsibility.
Yet at the same time, every US corporation is considered a "person"
due "equal protection"under the the 14th Amendment in the sense of "civil liberties". This gives corporations far more
power than human beings.
To
summarize a long point, in the
Military-Industrial-Finance-Corporate-Media-Security-Infotainment
complex, the heads of many of the largest corporations and
conglomerates include former
military intelligence officers, bankers, and former/future govt
appointees. Most govt. appointees are not lifetime politicians,
they're corporate officers, chiefs, lawyers, bankers. The Central
Intelligence Agency, which has never been about collecting information
but 80% covert ops, according to retired agents, it's directors are
typically Wall Street bankers and lawyers, not military intelligence.
This
financial shit is interlocked and layered, with subsidiaries and shells
and cross-linking. Corporate CEOs, lawyers, and bankers run the
government. Govt officials support multi-national corporations. It's a
revolving door. Why would a country based on a system of govt
called "capitalism" be any different? *(did you think I was going
to say "democracy" or a "republic"?)
Schoenman:
And while it is true as I
again like to point out, that history
is not driven by conspiracies.
It’s structured, it’s institutional, it’s systemic and it’s systematic
– but our rulers conduct their affairs in a conspiratorial manner
precisely because they are not answerable to our people because their
power is concealed. Power is not registered through formal representative
institutions that are empty of content. Power is not exercised through
those means.
Charles Townsend, former CEO of Avis, wrote a critical guide for successful corporations called "Up the Organization". He mentioned that a mere 5000 people control the "commanding heights" of the US economy, and that this ruling elite "regard this country as their own whore house and they treat each president as their private towel boy."So there ya go.
"I
never would have agreed to the formulation of the Central Intelligence
Agency back in '47, if I had known it would become the American
Gestapo. " -- Harry S Truman (1961) (leaders always seem to leave us these neat warnings after they've safely left office)
"Americans
don't read." Allen Dulles,
who was previously fired as
CIA Director by JFK, appointed to lead Warren
Commission by Johnson: "But nobody reads. Don't
believe people read in this country. There will be a few professors
that will read the record...The public will read very little."
(September 6, 1964, Warren Commission internal memo) "An
intelligence service is the ideal vehicle for a conspiracy." - Allen
Dulles
So there you have it. A starting point. A framework of understanding.
A light overview of Global Corporatism, a.k.a. the New World Order.
Anti-Globalization explanations, Protests, Military Police below
MORE (same link as above): Sell the Lexus, Burn the Olive Tree.
Speaking of corporations and business, this is not "proof" but some astonishing coincidences: The Saudi-BinLaden Group does a lot of construction and military work, close to the Bush family and US corporations. Guess what DATE their Internet domain www.saudi-binladin-group.comexpired.Check it out. Probably just a coincidence. The new site is www.sbg.com.sa.
There are numerous examples of known terrorists being connected with
officials in the Saudi govt. Yet when a Saudi dissident offered
the FBI over 14,000 documents before Sept 11, his offer was
rejected. A top Bush lawyer and others protected the
Saudis. Saudi Arabia itself was essentially "created by the CIA",
by bankers and oil companies.
This is only the tip of the iceberg of US collaboration with the very
same violent Islamic radical jihadist groups and cells that they are
claiming to protect us from, including the FBI and CIA rejecting
information handed to them, looking away at key moments, disciplining FBI agents
for tracking terrorism links, and joint banking and govt relations
with shadowy corporations like Ptech, charities, and other front groups.
Large
chunks of 9-11 seem to have been orchestrated by "proxy groups", which
is similar to saying "subsidiaries" of the USgov, which is similar to
saying "US business" and/or global business.
The biggest anomaly about September 11 is that Bush ordered NO investigation of September 11.
WHAT??!! Everyone knows that, right?
Imagine the cops find a dead body, and then a
note from an estranged spouse about hiring a hitman.
Is that proof?
No.
Not quite.
Is it evidence?
Hell yes!
The first suspicion is "inside job", the spouse is always a top suspect.
Now imagine the spouse is a cop, and imagine that the cops order no murder investigation. What would the citizens say, if they knew?
Imagine that three banks are robbed
today by teams of gunmen (19 total). Cops wait 90 minutes to
show up, too late to help. One bank is next door to a police
station, robbed
in broad daylight. Now imagine the police chief states that they
ARE going to ATTACK THIS CRIME
WAVE but they are NOT going to have
any investigation whatsoever
(later conceding under pressure to have a limited investigation of the
robberies).
Chief agrees to sends his detectives ... AWAY to a neighboring county ... or
country. Oh
No!! DON'T
INVESTIGATE I mean,
DUH!!
The
FBI has narrowed its focus to "about four" suspects in the 6 1/2-year
investigation of the deadly anthrax attacks of 2001, and at least three
of those suspects are linked to the Army’s bioweapons research facility at Fort Detrick in Maryland, FOX News has learned. Among the pool of suspects are three scientists — a former deputy commander, a leading anthrax scientist and a microbiologist — linked to the research facility, known as USAMRIID. ANTHRAX victims at the Sun Tabloid housed Sept 11 hijackers. (what this means, who knows, but it's weird)
Blocking an investigation is sufficient to
*prove* that something
is seriously wrong
with the official story. "Obstruction of justice" and
"interfering with an investigation" are serious crimes, but when the
orders come from the top, it has a different context.
Here's a brief list of other facts and situations that prove that Sept 11 is not what we were told:
The 1993 bombing is a known and admitted inside job by FBI.
The
Oklahoma City bombing is known to have included other suspects with
govt protection, the News reported multiple explosions and multiple
bombs found inside the building, and a top Army General (Partin) with 30 years' experience in explosives showed why it was not done by a truck bomb alone.
Multiple
instances of key terrorists and operations protected and sheltered from
law enforcement, prosecution, exposure, both before and after.
Destruction
of evidence, of both prior investigations and of various attacks,
including Sept 11. Able Danger, for one, where a huge database of
terrorism investigations was ordered erased and was wiped out.
According to one investigator, Feds working with Jeb Bush seized all
the records of the Venice, Florida police dept, near where the alleged
hijackers trained. (Jeb Bush past roles.)
Protecting
key Al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders during US military operations in the
War on Terror. Airlift of Evil and other events.
The
Saudi's attorney, a high US official close to the Bush family,
protected Saudis from a victims' lawsuit, from legal snooping.
The use of Al-Qaeda as a US proxy force, not only in Afghanistan, but on-going through the late 90's, through 2001, and beyond.
Evidence
of suggestions or pre-planning of "creating a terrorist threat" in
America, long before Sept 11, following the fall of the USSR and the
end of the Cold War, by the same people who heavily hyped the looming
Soviet threat in the 1980's and earlier decades.
Evidence that the Cold War itself was a vastly overhyped threat against an economic rival, that became military rival.
People openly suggesting the NEED for a "terrorist attack" on the American people, prior to Sept 11.
Involvement
of many other allied govts or Intelligence agencies, in collusion with
the US military and Intell, in sponsoring terrorist attacks on either
targeted people or groups, or sometimes random people, for political
reasons.
Multiple instances of terror bombings carried out in the past, by CIA, NATO, and affiliates, both in Europe and the Middle East.
Detailed plans for use of terror bombings in the US by military and govt officials, to spark a war.
Israel's
use of "terror provocations" to justify "revenge", and to raise
"revenge" to a "high moral value", described in the diary of a past
Israeli Prime Minister, Moshe Sherrat. Israel's Sacred Terrorism
Terrorist-related individuals, groups, and corporations "in bed" with members of the US government.
Prosecution
and harassment of whistleblowers, as well as some mysterious deaths,
similar to how about 100 people with information on the JFK
assassination were
also killed or found dead. This would include FBI agents like John
O'Neill, who was repeatedly obstructed, then killed on 9-11.
Collusion
in the Mainstream Media in lying directly about events, and of
obscuring obvious examples of red flag events, under-reporting.
Some US officials wanted a terror
bloodbath, in
writing, prior
to Sept 11.
If you overheard someone
advocating the need
for an attack on America, to launch a global revolution, would you
report them to the authorities?
What if they were the authorities? Wouldn't that represent a conflict of interest
if they were fighting terrorism, but at the same time, they WANTED a
9-11 event, and they belonged to orgs that supported violent Islamic radicals
for destabilization? For terror? For psychological warfare?
Public officials and govt PR flacks were writing
in scholarly
journals (that few people read) that Americans
NEEDED to experience
a
severe
and terrifying crisis - a bloodbath
- to drive Americans to support twin policies of
war
and domestic repression. These propagandists (with direct
contacts inside the CIA and Pentagon) described interim goals and
tactics, which paralleled those stated by "Osama bin Laden",
who is a"former" CIA and
Pentagon
asset --
-- the use of terror for political change in the USA.
WHY DOESN'T EVERYONE KNOW THIS? www.Takeoverworld.info/proterrorism.html
(updated:
February 11, 2008)
How many innocent people would you kill/sacrifice to steal a few trillion dollars?
How about for a huge visionary military-capital project to put the world under the control of your group?
PERMANENT WAR - STAKES FOR WORKING PEOPLE
by Ralph Schoenman -- tightest analysis of entire War on Terror
series quotes from Brzezinski's Grand
Chessboard book "For America, the chief
geopolitical prize
is Eurasia..." "That puts a premium on maneuver and
manipulation ..." The Green Peril - Creating the Islamic
Fundamentalist Threat (local mht)
by Leon Hader of the Jerusalem
Post/Cato Institute - 1992
Indeed, like the Red Menace of the Cold War era, the
Green Peril is perceived as a cancer spreading around the
globe, undermining the legitimacy of Western values and
political systems. The cosmic importance of the confrontation would
make it necessary for Washington to adopt a longterm diplomatic and
military strategy; to forge new and
solid alliances; to prepare the American people for a neverending
struggle that will test their resolve; and to develop
new containment policies, new doctrines, and a new foreign
policy elite with its "wise men" and "experts."
There are dangerous signs that the process of creating
a monolithic threat out of isolated events and trends in the
Moslem world is already beginning. The Green Peril thesis
is now being used to explain diverse and unrelated events in
that region, with Tehran replacing Moscow as the center of
ideological subversion and military expansionism and Islam
substituting for the spiritual energy of communism.
DIVX huey911.avi
smaller WMV huey911.wmv
