DMX (hardcore gangsta
rap): The
Snake, the Rat, the Cat, the Dog, ya can't see nothin when you're livin
in the fog.
Zbignew
Brzezinski [za BIG new, bruh ZIN
skee]
Brzezinski is the partner
of David Rockefeller.
Together they created the TriLateral Commission in 1973.
Intellectual
representative of 300 of the wealthiest people in the world.
Author. Strong influence on US policies, foreign and domestic.
He's like a bookend to Henry Kissinger, who is also a Tri-Lateralist.
Brzezinski was a rising advisor under Nixon.
Brzezinski served as National Security Advisor
under Jimmy Carter.
Actually,
Jimmy Carter was 'appointed' to serve under Rockefeller and
Brzezinski.
(Notice: America is a
capitalist country .. duh .. money talks, voting is free)
The Bushes
and Clintons are both Tri-Lateralists.
Tri-Laterals and their cousin the Council on Foreign Relations populate
Democrat and Republican cabinets and high positions.
TLC is ruthless and 'evil' and anti-democratic, one wrote 'Crisis of
Democracy'.
Astonishingly, Tri-Lateralists are LESS evil and more pragmatic than
neo-conservatives.
Brzezinski secretly launched
the Al-Qaeda Project before Reagan called them "freedom fighters".
if you want more details on Brzezinski first , START WITH
-->>
MEET
Al-Qaeda
FOUNDER
Then come here to see how
to decode
his philosophy on US
foreign and
domestic policy,
based on quotes from his
own books, articles, and public statements.
What do you think about how
brilliant and devious this guy has
been?
NEXT go to the GLOBAL CONQUEST page.
Brzezinski, an
avowed anti-Soviet, has been accused by the Bircher right wing of
acting as a "communist social-economic planner" along with David
Rockefeller, but
this is "communism
for corporations, not people". That's Monopoly Capitalism,
or State-Capitalism, for
private profit. It needs the expansion of US
imperialism, and it needs conquest of the American public by deceit and fear.
They will
'scientifically' suppress American 'insurgents'
by carefully honing the
point of marginal utility
of
political/economic/military/intellectual/social repression (but hopefully
not too
much repression to provoke a reaction that could threaten their rule,
not too little repression that the might lose control), in
order to
maximize profitability at the very top 1% of America's population, the
"commanding heights" of U.S. capitalism.
Fascism is a political
ideology which includes tranferring the pangs in your belly, the
emptiness of your wallet, and your general dissatisfaction with life
and feeling cheated to
(a) a universal
enemy - and -
(b) a dream or
mythology of national greatness, to supercede personal greatness and
success, which will be unattainable by most people. Sacrifice is
required, and the reward is symbolic.
Brzezinski
believes that passivity and defeatism are positive effects, for
the masses, because that brings out mindless obedience. And he's
not even a neo-conservative, who are truly rough.
|
Brzezinski:
"It is also a fact that America is too
democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of
America's power, especially its capacity for military
intimidation.
(What is THIS
factor that limits the capacity for military intimidation, which
he and his audience do not want to be limited? The public
will, a huge, squirming blob of some 200 - 300 million creatures who
don't like war and dying and killing. That's the problem.)
Never before has a populist democracy
attained international supremacy. But the pursuit
of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's
sense of domestic well-being.
(We've now defined the goals,
we've defined the problem, and we've defined the simplest solution to
that problem. Again ...)
The economic self-denial (that is, defense spending)
and the human sacrifice (casualties,
even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial
to democratic instincts.
Democracy is
inimical to imperial mobilization." —from The Grand
Chessboard, American Primacy And It's Geostrategic Imperatives,"
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Basic Books, 1997
This
is why they say "democracy" and "mob rule" does not work ... for
them. People are not obedient enough.
Brzezinski
DECODED:
let's break
down this quote, including a compilation
of
other quotes below:
these are things they WANT, "good" things:
autocratic action abroad (hardcore
dictatorship), military intimidation, pursuit
of power, imperial mobilization, international
supremacy, human
sacrifice, economic self-denial (that
is, massive defense spending leading to poverty and lowered
expectations), public
consensus on foreign policy issues, casualties (when
required for their goals), controlled society, continuous surveillance over every citizen,
instantaneous retrieval of
your
files by the authorities, order depends
on somehow compelling
newly mobilized strata (Vietnam Syndrome) to
return to a
measure of passivity
and defeatism,
and so on
Most people think that human sacrifice is
undesireable. They find it necessary
and desireable. The problem is the most people find it
undesireable. You might think passivity
and defeatism is bad. They think defeatism is good, and very important for
maintaining ORDER, specifically the order of them being in charge and
us obeying without question.
here is the list of problems, the barriers they must
overcome: democracy
at home, democratic instincts,
populist democracy, popular passion, multi-cultural society,
traditional values (of Liberty), limitations on the use of American
power, public's desire for a sense of domestic well-being,
In a nutshell, the problem is
people's instinctive aversion to war, to wasteful spending, to needless
death and suffering, to grief over losing children to war, and a strong
aversion that every normal, non-sociopath person has to slaughtering
other people (a natural averson to
killing even 'enemies', esp if you have to kill
them yourself), particularly
a problem when
magnified through free democratic
expression of public dissent. They need to find
methods and means to channel vigorous democratic action into passive
public defeatism. They need to overcome the 'disease' known as
"Vietnam Syndrome", a repugnant feeling towards war, government, and
elite corporate rule. How about crack
cocaine? Police brutality? Vapid television? Empty patriotic gestures?
(The Pentagon
has spent a lot of effort studying psychology to overcome the human
aversion to killing: On
Killing, by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman uncovered some terrible
side-effects to creating a huge mass of warped killers.)
So therefore, they
decided to cancel
their plans for imperial mobilization, to
preserve our Wonderful Democracy. Right? Right?
Don't kid
yourself!
They reduce and sidestep democracy.
Cheat.
Lie. Hide. Obscure. Reveal. Feint.
Manipulate.
Terrorize. Promote radical Islam. Stage domestic terror,
and introduce the PATRIOT Act and Military
Commissions Act of 2006 to ostensibly combat the terrorism they
intentionally created.
How Brzezinski describes SOLUTIONS
to overcoming the PROBLEMS:
Going thru the motions of bi-partisanship,
to maintain the illusion of democracy
Getting
both
parties on the same page
a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat
a sudden threat
challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being,
blamed on a demonized enemy, internal like
"liberals" or extenal like "Muslims"
manipulate
emotions and control reason via magnetic personalities like
media 'stars' and politicians,
security
dependence among the vassals [vassals are
lesser foreign allies who are dependent on US military, also could be
us, the
serfs]
shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor
a
New Pearl
Harbor (per his partner, Rockefeller,
AND the PNAC group around Bush)
Short
of arresting Brzezinski and sending him to Guantanimo Bay for an
interrogation, these quotes
on this page from his books and articles are probably the closest we'll
ever get to
a complete
confession that the United States "shadow government"
orchestrated Sept 11, with or without 'live' Arab pastys, other than the playboy
cokehead Arab decoys in Florida.
Schoenman:
And while it is true as I
again like to point out, that history
is not driven by conspiracies.
It’s structured, it’s institutional, it’s systemic and it’s systematic
– but our rulers conduct their affairs in a conspiratorial manner
precisely because they are not answerable to our people because their
power is concealed. It’s not registered through formal representative
institutions that are empty of content. Power is not exercised through
those means.
Robert Townsend was the president of Avis
and American Express. He
did a book called Up the Organization
[in which] he calculates that 5,000 people control what he calls the
commanding heights of the US economy. And Townsend tells us that they regard this country as their own whore
house and they treat each
president as their private towel boy. Well, I don’t think
that’s rhetoric. I think that’s an accurate sociological description.
|
links on this page
"scientific" methods of
control
Wikipedia
source
explained, Brzezinski compared and explained
CIA
controls ALL the media
MORE Brzezinski QUOTES
This Ain't Your Momma's CIA
Excellent
analysis of the G8 War
by Break for News
DONT MISS MORE QUOTES BY FASCISTS
"explicit
aim of promoting radical Islam" = US foreign policy (and
that's
a quote) (of Wikipedia
stating US policy under Brzezinski)
 SAMPLE
QUOTE
Brzezinski
on America: "...
society dominated by an elite whose
claim to
political power would rest on allegedly superior
scientific
know-how.
Unhindered
by the
restraints of traditional
liberal values (founding liberal values like
freedom), this elite would not hesitate to
achieve its political ends by using the latest
modern
techniques for influencing
public behavior and keeping
society under close
surveillance and control."
Technical and scientific momentum would then feed on the situation it
exploits.
His forecasts proved accurate. Today, a number of new tools
for the "elite" are emerging, and the temptation to use them increases
steadily. The policies to permit the tools to be used are already in
place. How could the
United States be changed, bit by bit, into the predicted
highly-controlled technosociety? Among the "steppingstones"
Brzezinski expected were persisting
social crises and
use of the mass media to gain the public's
confidence.
http://watch.pair.com/FreedomHouse.html
(whacky site, good research)
The Trilateral Commission was
created by David Rockefeller
and CFR member Zbigniew
Brezinski with the goal of economic
linkage between Japan, Europe, and the United States, and: "...managing
the world economy...a smooth and peaceful evolution of the global
system." (except Brz has historically
supported mass murderers like Pol Pot and Al-Qaeda)
By the way: The Tri-Lateral Commission is
not a "conspiracy
theory". Neither is the CFR.
Trilateral
Commission 1156 Fifteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005
202-467-5410
Council
on Foreign
Relations founded in 1921 and based at 58 East 68th Street
(corner Park Avenue) in New York City, with an additional office at
1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20036
202-518.3400.
Brezenski, National Security Advisor to President Carter, CFR
member and first Director of the Trilateral Commission wrote of a
society controlled by a Power Elite in his 1970 book, Between Two
Ages:
America's Role in the Technetronic Era:
The technotronic
era involves the gradual
appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be
dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values (like liberty and democracy). Soon
it will be possible to assert almost
continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain
up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information
about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.
Today we are again
witnessing the emergence of transnational
elites...[whose] ties cut across national boundaries... It is
likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced
countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and
outlook....
Within a few years
the rebels in the more advanced countries who today have the most
visibility will be joined by a new generation making its claim to power
in government and business... accepting as routine managerial processes
current innovations such as planning-programming-budgeting systems
(PPBS) ... A national information grid that will integrate existing
electronic data banks is already being developed.... The projected world information grid,
for which Japan, Western Europe, and the United
States are most suited, could create the basis for a common educational
program, for the adoption of common academic standards....
The nation-state is
gradually yielding its
sovereignty. ... In the economic-technological field, some
international cooperation has already been achieved, but further
progress will require greater
American sacrifices. More intensive
efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be
undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively
favorable American position.
This
might even be seen as beautiful ... sharing ... if this
were not
run by the control freaks who helped create Al-Qaeda.
NOAM
CHOMSKY
author of Keeping
the Rabble in Line blunt commentary on the Power Elites' strategy for
controlling the masses:
"The
bewildered herd
are a problem. We've got to prevent their rage and
trampling. We've got to distract them. They should be watching the
Super Bowl or sitcoms
or violent movies or
something. Every once
in a
while you call on them to chant
meaningless
slogans like 'Support Our
Troops' (not
totally meaningless, IMO, it really means "support the military +
intelligence + security + repression industry"), and you've got
to keep them pretty scared
because unless
they're scared properly and frightened
of all kinds of devils that are
going to destroy them from outside or inside or somewhere, they may
start to think,
which is very dangerous because they're not competent
to think, and therefore it's important to distract and to marginalize
them."
|
WOW.
"Unhindered
by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not
hesitate to achieve its political ends ..."
He's saying "the
ends justify the means" for their plans.
Sound like a good
future for everyone else? Climb aboard.
Here's a background history of
Brzezinski's problem, as a leader of
the US elite ruling class. YOU MIGHT SKIP THIS
AND GO STRAIGHT TO QUOTES
The
US Government currently
provides a relatively higher standard of living to it's own
inhabitants, while catering politically and militarily to rapacious
elites who severely devour the living standards of other nations, as
well as that of more marginalized domestic classes like blacks and Native
Americans, backed by the power of Federal
police. The SUPER-RICH need the
SUPER-POOR.
Chossudovsky
describes mass poverty
as an INPUT to economic
globalization, to increase
profits for investors. Not as a perhaps unintentional side
effect to be worked out. Globalization
of Poverty. It's global mass poverty that will push wages
lower and profits higher. Of course the poor can't buy stuff,
but ....
In
the late 1800's and early 1900's following "official abolition" (while
maintaining effective slavery through enforced ghettoization), American
industrial and financial elites had no
problem "devouring their own", just as Northern elites were content
devouring the labor of The South, America's first "Third World colony".
After decades of intense
labor struggle and resulting concessions by
FDR (and an attempted
domestic Fascist Coup), American and global elites are now
returning to their traditional role of economic cannibalism with more
vigor, using new "scientific" methods
of control and economic
repression, proceeding more cautiously, advancing in leaps under
Bush (and
Clinton to a
quieter degree), and with clear stated intentions to ramp up
economic and political repression
in the future, increasing economic inequality, step-by-step.
Most
of the quotes here are from Wikipedia,
an online collaborative encyclopedia.
Wikipedia
strives to provide balanced viewpoints, and where controversy exists,
to present a variety of
viewpoints as differing viewpoints,
weighing them only as mainstream or less commonly held.
Wikipedia on Brzezinski is not
some "hit piece",
but fairly generic, mostly relying on unambiguous official statements
and his own statements and writings. It's less than a promo, but not unfriendly
at all. External links are included, and some are more of
Brzezinski's writings to elites, some are Brzezinski's some of his
statements retooled for public consumption, some are
lauditory essays about him.
A few links are very critical, tying him to responsibility for Sept 11 (some by
questionable authors like Tarpley).
Brzezinski's
own words -- if read with insight -- are sufficient to grasp the
intentions of him and his criminal cabal.
Brzezinski is like a bookend
to Henry
Kissinger. Compared to Neo-cons,
he's a moderate.
His
beef with the Neo-cons
are that they are too blunt, too obvious, and might break their game,
cause a set-back on their
progress at global and domestic domination.
Most Americans (even
Republicans) were NOT AWARE
of Clinton's draconian precursor
to the PATRIOT
Act. Clinton and Brzezinski types do "smooth".
Neo-cons promote insane levels of chaos and
destruction, whereas Brzezinski's Elite Liberal Establishment
promotes managed and structured chaos and destruction.
Aiming
to replace Kissinger's "acrobatics" in foreign policy-making with a
foreign policy "architecture" ...
Marxist
Philosophy states simply that Capitalism
-- particularly neo-liberal global State-capitalism -- is incompatible with democracy, due to
it's need for mass repression in favor of elite profit. (democracy a.k.a. a
balanced republican form of governance geared to protect human Liberty)
Brzezinski discusses the
growing gap between "haves" and "have nots", globally and domestically,
and the threat that presents
to elite rule.
Brzezinski
openly agrees with Marxists that democracy and rampant capitalist
acquisition are
incompatible. Brzezinski's solution is to advocate subversion of
democracy and our representative govt, via clever propaganda
and managed chaos via terrorism. (no
kidding)
(Not
eliminating democratic representation, just subverting it, so
it's there in form, but not substance.)
steps towards
totalitarianism
HOW CLINTON WAS BUSH
BEFORE BUSH
EXCERPT
FROM A STORY ON CLINTON'S proto-PATRIOT Act
The 1996
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act was signed into law
following the Oklahoma City bombing on August 19, 1995. It prompted the
worst assaults on civil liberties the United States had seen in
decades", writes George- town law professor David Cole and James X.
Dempsey in Terrorism and the Constitution. Clinton admitted to making “a
number of ill-advised changes in our immigration laws, having nothing
to do with fighting terrorism.”
“It was such
a weird charge because it’s almost like thought crime. How do you
prove that someone has intent?
It’s funny how they try to slip
it by and build a whole fraudulent
case against you with things that
you didn’t do."
HOW WILSON WAS BUSH BEFORE BUSH
|
FAMOUS QUOTES
BY THE
FOUNDER OF AL-QAEDA
foreground
or background advisor on US foreign (and domestic) policy under Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush,
Clinton, and now Bush, National Security Advisor under Carter
(or over Carter)
Brzezinski
selected Georgia
governor Jimmy
Carter as a member. (and groomed him to rule, and helped get him elected)
The
Trilateral Commission: Not
a conspiracy theory. 300 of the most wealthy powerful guys
in the world, meeting and sharing over coffee and donuts, all looking out for NUMBER ONE
-- themselves -- at the expense
of everyone else, via geostrategic
theories of domination, regional power alliances, using
America as a military/finance base. Some call that scheme the
"New World Order", including themselves.
 Let's decode
this:
"It is also a fact
that America is too democratic at home to be
autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power,
especially its capacity for military intimidation.
Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy.
But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge
to the public's sense of domestic well-being. The
economic self-denial (that is, defense spending) and the human
sacrifice (casualties, even among professional soldiers)
required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial
mobilization." —from The Grand Chessboard
Brzezinski openly agrees with
Marxists that democracy and capitalist
acquisition are incompatible.
SO
... kill democracy.
Is this a conspiracy theory?
No, it's direct written quotes from his books (and my clarification).
Which would
YOU openly choose? Their power and
international supremacy, or your freedom?
Wait til you
get hit by the "Al-Qaeda Project".
That'll make you change your mind.
Brzezinski, known for
his hardline policies on the Soviet
Union, initiated a campaign supporting mujaheddin in Pakistan
and Afghanistan, which
were run by Pakistani security services with financial support from the
CIA
and Britain's MI6.
This policy had the explicit aim of promoting
radical Islamist and anti-Communist forces to overthrow the secular communist People's Democratic Party
of Afghanistan government in Afghanistan,
which had been destabilized by coup attempts against Hafizullah Amin,
the power struggle within the Soviet-supported parcham faction of the
PDPA and a subsequent Soviet military intervention.
Saudis
DID fund Al-Qaeda ... says so here ... on arrangements by Brzezinski
He
was formerly a
director of the Trilateral Commission (now serving only on the
executive committee, and formerly a boardmember of Freedom
House.
His
vision is
actually less
ambitious
than that of the Bush
administration. This "geopolitical pluralism" would assure that
the United States would preside over a system in which a
variety of multinational corporations
would exploit the regional energy supply, although not necessarily
backed by military muscle on the ground. In short, Zbig and his
realist liberal friends want to dominate with a
multilateral
veneer
while Bush and his neoconservative backers have no
problem dominating
unilaterally.
This distinction
without a difference is also known as "democratic choice." http://www.americanidealism.com/articles/zbigniew-brzezinski-the-democrats-kissinger.html
It's NOT about OIL. They've got
plenty of oil.
It's about money. They don't have enough
money.
To quote Brzezinski, it's about unhindered
financial and economic access.
I
encouraged the Chinese to support Pol
Pot. I encouraged the Thai to help the Khmer Rouge. The question was how
to help the Cambodian people. Pol Pot was
an
abomination. We could never support him. But China could."
—1979 (Pol Pot murdered about 2 million people, supported
by the CIA.)
The
Iranian Shah,
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi meeting with Arthur Atherton, William H.
Sullivan, Cyrus Vance, President Jimmy Carter, and Zbigniew
Brzezinski,1977
MIND
CONTROL
"In the
technotronic society the
trend would seem to be towards the aggregation
of the individual support of millions of uncoordinated citizens,
easily within the reach of magnetic
and attractive personalities effectively exploiting the
latest communications techniques to manipulate
emotions and control reason." —1970, Between Two
Ages : America's Role in the Technetronic
Era
The following statement was made more than
twenty-five years ago in a book by Brzezinski which he wrote while a
professor at Columbia University:
"Political strategists are tempted to exploit
research on the brain and human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon
J.F. MacDonald, a specialist in problems of warfare, says
accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes could lead to
a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels
over certain regions of the earth ... in this way one could develop a
system that would seriously impair
the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions
over an extended period"
" ... no matter how deeply
disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior
for national advantages, to some, the technology permitting such use
will very probably develop within the next few decades."
another
DECODED quote:
"Moreover, as America becomes
an increasingly multi-cultural society
[tolerant, wise, mature, not
ignorant Arab-hating, or Gook-hating, or Nigger-hating racists],
we may find it more
difficult
to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues [unrepentant looting
and plunder by elites, lack
of racist hatred and cultural fear make mass killing less palatable and
harder to justify], except in the
circumstance of a truly massive and widely
perceived direct external threat." [solves that problem
of human compassion]
—from The Grand
Chessboard
What
Uncle Sam Really Wants
The main goals of US foreign policy, quoting George
Kennan and others
(note: this is the same Chomsky
who claims that Sept 11 was not an inside job,
despite the fact that he spells out the entire basis of what it was,
right here in 1993)
The policies
recommended by NSC 68 would require "sacrifice and discipline"
in the United States -- in other words, huge military
expenditures and cutbacks on social services. It would also be
necessary to overcome the "excess of tolerance" that
allows too much domestic dissent.
(Fuck the Bill of Rights. Fuck
Rights, period. The idea that Rights come from God and derive from mere
existence and self-ownership as a human being, this is quaint romantic
idealism of the classical liberals who founded America based on Liberty
and Justice for All.
It is Obedience which grants privileges,
just like under a King or Dictator. WRONG. In truth, they
cannot take your rights, they can only violate your
Rights, and they commit treason when they break their own
Oaths to the public trust, to uphold the Constitution.)
These policies were, in fact, already
being implemented. In 1949, US espionage in Eastern Europe had been
turned over to a network run by Reinhard Gehlen, who had
headed Nazi military intelligence on the Eastern Front. This
network was one part of the US-Nazi alliance that
quickly absorbed many of the worst criminals, extending to operations
in Latin America and elsewhere.
George
Kennan, who headed the State Department planning staff until 1950
Kennan's
office, incidentally, was responsible for the Gehlen network of Nazi
spies being put back in power in Germany, and set free in Argentina and Langley.
Kennan: "we have about 50% of
the world's wealth, but only 6.3% of its population....In this
situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our
real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships
which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity....To
do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality
and day-dreaming; and our attention will have to be concentrated
everywhere on our immediate national objectives....We
should cease to talk about vague and...unreal objectives such as human
rights, the raising of the living standards, and
democratization.
The day is not far off when we are going to have to
deal in straight power concepts (force, brutality). The
less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better." (Force and brutality as a method of
rule and commerce is the exact opposite of every ideal on which America
was founded, on what makes America great. Fascist "straight
power" is not what people think of when they say "America is a great
country". But that's all these guys see, no matter what pretty
phrases they use to dress it up, like "Saddam was a butcher, we want
the people of Iraq to be free.")
PPS 23 was, of course, a top-secret
document. To pacify the public, it was necessary to trumpet
the "idealistic slogans" (as is still being done constantly),
but here planners were talking to one another.
Along the same lines, in a briefing for
US ambassadors to Latin American countries in 1950, Kennan observed
that a major concern of US foreign policy must be "the
protection of our [i.e. Latin America's] raw materials." We
must therefore combat a dangerous heresy which, US intelligence
reported, was spreading through Latin America: "the idea that
the government has direct responsibility for the welfare of the people."
(This policy, not
only of eliminating 'welfare payments',
but rejecting the concept of the govt created
by us to protect "general welfare", is being
implemented in America too. The
welfare state is NOT coming to an
end, quite the opposite -- war is corporate welfare -- a free
service of armed robbery and murder supported by taxpayers.
Defense spending and "liberalization" of the
restrictions of military force over civilian affairs, for both external
"threats" and internal "threats" of dissent (policy long preceding
9-11) is ramping up. This IS THE PLAN, not a
side-effect of poor planning in Iraq or dysfunctional agencies on Sept
11 or Katrina.)
Here's your answer, Mark
Manning, as to what US foreign
policy really is about. How could you be so intelligent,
and be making a political movie, analyzing, and be so dumb as to not
know this history? How much do they pay you for acting like it's
a mystery and a "mistake"? They've been saying "mistakes were
made" for decades
now. Are you just "playing dumb", like Bush?
|
Jon Stewart
joking on the 'Miami Seven' psyop
on the Daily Show
"The attitude of the American
public toward the external projection of American power has been much
more ambivalent. The public
supported America's engagement in World War
II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on
Pearl Harbor.” [wink]
In
the early 70's, when Brzezinski was touting the Technotronic Era
and new controls on civilian populations, his buddy Samuel
Huntingon
over at Trilateral was calling for a "cataclysmic crisis" for social
control in his book "Crisis of Democracy". This basically stated,
'American people are too uppity for a democracy'.
"In brief, for
the United States, Eurasian geostrategy involves the purposeful management of
geostrategically dynamic states [dynamic
- change, unrest] and the careful handling
of geopolitically catalytic states [catalytic - capable of causing an
explosive reaction], in keeping with the twin
interests of America in the short-term: preservation of its
unique global power and in the long-run transformation of it into
increasingly institutionalized global cooperation.
[DECODED
in
plain English: carefully managed
terrorism for power and profit, while setting up a global intelligence
network coalition led by American Intelligence and allies, i.e. what they call The New
World Order]
In his 1970 piece Between Two Ages: America's Role in the
Technetronic Era, Brzezinski argued that a coordinated
policy
amongst developed
nations was
necessary in order to counter global
instability erupting from increasing economic inequality.
Nothing about FIXING economic
inequality. Rather, it's about increasing
economic
inequality. And then countering
"instability", i.e. repressing pissed off populations by
corralling them with a "police
state system" and/or military occupation.
These guys are smart enough to build their police state ahead of their planned economic
meltdown.
"This regionalization is in
keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan
which calls for a gradual convergence
of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of one
world government. National
sovereignty is no longer a viable concept." --- Zbignew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President
Jimmy Carter
"... the Central Asian region
and the Caspian Sea basin are known to contain reserves of natural gas
and oil that dwarf those of Kuwait, the Gulf of Mexico, or the North
Sea."
"It follows that America's
primary interest is to help ensure that no single power comes to
control this geopolitical space and that the global community has unhindered
financial and economic access to it."
"That puts a premium on maneuver
and manipulation in order to prevent the emergence of a
hostile coalition that could eventually seek to challenge America's
primacy..." destabilizing the Middle East states to
prevent them from forming a coalition.
Soviet
Union and Al-Qaeda
It was July 3, 1979, that President Carter signed the first directive for secret
aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime (Al-Qaeda) in Kabul. And that very
day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that
in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military
intervention." —Le Nouvel
Observateur, Paris, 15-21 January 1998
"We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its
Vietnam war."— On
precipitating the Soviet
invasion of Afghanistan
"What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban
or the collapse of
the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Muslims or the
liberation of Central Europe
and the end of the cold war?"
- 1998 interview
President Jimmy Carter and Soviet General
Secretary Leonid
Brezhnev
sign the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT II) treaty, 16 June 1979, in Washington D.C. Zbigniew Brzezinski
is directly behind President Carter, and is the only person smiling in the picture.
Presidential Directive 18 on
U.S. National Security, signed early in Carter's term, signalled a fundamental
reassessment of the value of detente, and set the U.S. on a course to
quietly end
the stability and accommodation associated with Kissinger's strategy.
To put it in a terminology
that hearkens back to the more brutal age of ancient
empires, the three grand imperatives of imperial
geostrategy are to
prevent collusion [right/left dischord
over nonsense issues, playing global chess with countries and groups] and maintain security dependence
among the vassals [that's
us, the disposable serfs who work for the feudal lords],
to keep tributaries pliant
and protected [oil rich countries, and
money flows], and to keep the
barbarians
from coming together. [everyone
who should be opposing them, keep
divided and conquered, civil war in Iraq,
Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, and the Leftgatekeepers
like Amy Goodman]"
—from The Grand Chessboard
from Brzezinski's
ally: "The
West won the
world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion but
rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners
often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do."
-- Samuel P.
Huntington
Live by the sword,
die by the sword. My fear is they will turn
the sword on the civilian population. They have NO moral
compunction about attacking civilians anywhere, including their own,
and they are very concerned about Americans waking up and resisting en
masse.
"The president himself has to make, in a
speech addressed to the nation, a careful, reasoned case,
without sloganeering, on the specifics of the threat.
Detailed evidence needs to be presented that the
threat is both grave and imminent. An explanation is
also needed as to why one member of ‘the axis of evil’ is
seen as more menacing than the others."
Bush partially flubbed this one, by relying too much on
cliches and sloganeering, too little on reasoning. Bad Bush.
"...foreign policy of a pluralistic
democracy like the United States should be based on bipartisanship because
bipartisanship is the means and the
framework for formulating policies based on moderation and on
the recognition of the complexity of
the human condition. That has been the tradition since the days
of Truman and Vandenberg all the way until recent times."
—Address to the New American
Strategies Conference, October
28, 2003
[DECODED in plain English:
"Bi-Partisanship" looks
like democracy, it's been a tradition, keep using it
because complex human
beings will grudgingly accept almost anything if two "opposite" parties
seem to come to agreement. If they don't stick with the two-party
"framework"
for consensus, people might start getting leery about the policy
too, or even the legitimacy
of elite rule.
Best not to rouse the beast
from it's slumber.]
Zbigniew
Brzezinski Polish-American
strategist, professor and former National Security Advisor to President
Jimmy Carter. He has several prominent children, including:
- Mika Brzezinski
newsanchor and correspondent, perhaps best known for her live
coverage of the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center attacks
- Ian
Brzezinski, current U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for
European and NATO Affairs
- Mark
Brzezinski, prominent attorney and constitutional scholar [how to get around the constitution]
|
Let's take a look at what "Al-Qaeda" has accomplished
so far: 
1) two entire
countries turned over the western oil interests, Afghanistan now run by
former
Unocal consultants
2) 3000 dead
American civilians in NY, many more sickened by toxic and carcinogenic
air, dying of cancer and other diseases, since Bush ordered EPA to tell
them air was fine
3) 6000 (approx)
dead Afghani civilians, tens of thousands more starved to death,
frozen, maimed and missing arms, legs, eyes, though the countryside is
in utter chaos. CIA-run heroin production which
Taliban stopped, now skyrocketing.
4) 700,000 (approx)
dead Iraqi civilians, with triple or quadruple that number permanently
maimed, terrorized, displaced, dislocated. Robbed of all their
possessions of a middle class lifestyle, or farming lifestyle, or
whatever. Iraq being carved up by GLOBAL oil
interests, with American companies in the lead, not simply to acquire oil for the
US market, but to prevent
other countries from buying oil directly without subservience to the
Washington Consensus, i.e. neo-liberalism,or as Poppy Bush said, "What
we say, goes."
5) 2500+ American
troops dead (which Kissinger called
soldiers stupid animals to be used as cannon fodder for political games),
probably 20,000+ maimed and psychologically damaged (don't
mention psychologically maimed Iraqis),
many with permanent injuries, but don't worry, we'll cut veterans
benefits (as in the past) so
taxpayers aren't affected
(according to Time, "... founders of the Chowder and Marching
Society, formed in 1949 by 15 fractious young Republicans of the House [[Nixon
and Ford among them] to oppose
monthly bonuses for war veterans,
...") (see Bonus Marchers shot
by Army) 6) 600+
Lebanese
civilians dead, Shiite, Sunni, Druze, and Christians of all sects,
mostly farmers, shepherds, and the very poor in the cities, based
loosely off America's War against Al-Qaeda, and with Al-Qaeda
offering to "help" Hezbollah, Hz refusing Al-Qaeda's help (i think Hz is a legit resistance, as opposed
to Al-Qaeda)
7) uncounted
numbers
(mostly Arabs, and American troops, but worldwide) who will die from
cancer and other conditions and have an epidemic of birth defects, due
to dumping radioactive waste (depleted uranium) all over Iraq, Bosnia,
Lebanon
8) a few hundred
dead Israelis, civilians and soldiers
as one American officer said about the staged
Pearl Harbor event, "It
was a cheap price" http://www.silverbearcafe.com/infamy.html
(Lieutenant Commander Joseph Rochefort, head of the
Navy’s Mid-Pacific Radio Intelligence Network.)
Gosh,
it looks like this Al-Qaeda Project,
rather than being good for Arab liberation, actually serves the role
getting them killed and dominated by foreigners.
Since
Al-Qaeda was undeniably, irrefutably an American-British Intelligence
creation in the first place ... Hmmm ... Makes you wonder.
Arab people must be saying, with friends like
him, who needs enemies?
If I were an oil speculator/investor, I'd be sending Osama a case of
Old Malt Scotch for Christmas. Who's he working for anyhow?!!
(The current President is literally an
American Intelligence creation ... by his father. And John
Kerry, like Bush and like Heinrich Himmler, is admittedly a
member of Skull and Bones ... only he and Bush told a giggling Tim
Russert
they can't talk about it.)
|
CIA Control over the Media
recall what
Brzezinksi said above about using "latest modern
techniques for
influencing public behavior and keeping society under close
surveillance and control"
for a
more detailed overview on the relevance
of
Reinhard Gehlen Nazi
SS officer,
CIA, Sept 11
look here
first
at my post on Break for News
or more details on Nazi-history here
and Media
here and Fascist
here and BushNazi
here and Al-Qaeda+CIA
here
and fascist
reaction here ALL on this website, some
redundancy until I clean it up.
William
Colby,
former Director of the CIA, once admitted
(to Congress):
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone
of any
significance in the major media."
This means that
potentially EVERYTHING we watch and read and listen to is filtered or
shaped by the CIA as a form of disinformation AND social
engineering. Bill Casey, below, agrees.
"We'll know our disinformation program
is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
-- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting, 1981)
http://mtracy9.tripod.com/cia_media.htm
THIS IS A hot article on the topic
a snippet from Carl Bernstein's famous 1977
article entitled "The CIA & The Media" from Rolling
Stone
There are many, many articles which go even deeper and
deeper, into CIA-media, and CIA terror
operations overseas and COINTELPRO type domestic operations.
"From 1945 to the end of
the century, the United States
attempted to overthrow more than 40
foreign governments, and to crush
more than 30
populist-nationalist movements struggling against
intolerable regimes. In the process, the US
caused the end of life for several
million people, and condemned many
millions more to a life of agony and despair."
-- meticulously
documented books, Killing Hope and
Rogue State by William Blum
According to William Colby, Gladio
"stay-behind" secret NATO paramilitary
organizations in Western Europe were "a major program".
The Pentagon and CIA have
outsourced many of the tactics of disinformation to specialists:
Madison Ave, Hill and
Knowlton Group, Rendon Group, etc. are nothing if not slick.
Hill and
Knowlton were architects of disinformation on the Gulf War, on the
payroll of Kuwaiti oil families. It is illegal for a foreign govt
to stage a giant political PR campaign on the US public, but Bush I
didn't care.
The Rendon Group is one of the major PR companies that helped Bush II
sell the 2003 Iraq War and the War on Terror.
This is NOT just a
single marketing campaign, but an international system of coordinated
narrowcasting, branding, and controlling
thought via a variety of news viewpoints, both mainstream and
"alternative".
Whistleblowers
who happen to get headlines are usually part of the "limited hangout"
marketing. Otherwise, they would remain unheard. (Rather than getting
into "spooky" descriptions, I prefer to describe this as in common
"business" terms, marketing strategy to control the public.)
If real
whistleblowers are too damaging, they get
iced.
Two lawyers working on proving that Sirhan
Sirhan didn't kill RFK ... and the CIA did ... both
suddenly died.
|
|
answer to the
question, if
THEY control the
media, why
did THEY expose Abu-Gharaib and everything bad?
A snake
slithers sideways. An army attacks
at the flank,
not head on. The appearance of democracy is
important. Not Bush's reputation. Abu Gahraib was buried by
Nick Berg's timely
beheading anyhow.
Dissent
and even outrage is fine, helpful
if it makes things seem "democratic", but overall
public perception must be managed and stroked.
Is the CIA working FOR
America?
No they're lookin out for Number One -- themselves, and their bosses
and allies.
how much the
Nazi-lovin' Intelligence sector loves America:
google
McCormack-Dickstein
The 1933 plot to
overthrow America and install a fascist dictatorship. Known as
the Bankers' Plot.
Same people
who helped Hitler later formed the CIA.
The only reason it
didn't happen is they picked a General who was too honest.
They claimed to be patriotic about
America, but like Mussolini was patriotic about Italy.
Crackdown. Dictatorship. For their benefit.
Brute Force alone
doesn't
work that well, they found. It's better to manipulate
much of the public into wanting
dictatorship or believing dictatorship is democracy, than
imposing it by force and terror alone. Force is inefficient
compared to Television and Music and School. The Nazis actually
learned that from America, via Edward
Bernays, the father of modern propaganda and marketing. Century of Self, a BBC movie, is a
pretty good exposé on Bernays effects, as far as that
goes. Learn how they trick us.
|
I have to admit, Brzezinski's plan for EXITING Iraq sounds very
intelligent, and it was posted by IVAW:
Brzezinski recently described his plan in
this must-watch interview on PBS NewsHour.
Brzezinski proposes what he describes as "pulling out in an intelligent
fashion." This
plan has four parts:
1) "Talk at length with the Iraq leadership as to when we
have
to leave. Those who say, 'We don't want you to leave,' are the ones who
leave
when we leave. The real leaders, probably not living in the Green Zone,
will
say, 'Yes, leave.' I suspect Sistani is among them."
2) "Then, announce jointly a date, but a date set
jointly."
3) "Let the Iraqi government convene a conference of
all of Iraq's Muslim
neighbors about stabiliz |
