It is now well-known that Donald
Rumsfeld discussed "attacking
Iraq" in
terms of "opportunity" to "go wide, hit S.H., scoop it up, related or
not", and many people saw that as simply crass and
sickening. Others may consider it
"visionary and pro-active". But what's missing is that THESE WARLORDS DID NOT SUDDENLY
SEE
"opportunity". They planned for it. Did they get "lucky"
... or did they create their
luck? I'm betting on the latter, in part because: No one in the MSM is asking even the
most obvious questions!
"Lucky" is
not my adjective. It's
what Ledeen
said in his book, echoed by an official PNAC
publication, to describe Pearl
Harbor, as a "positive" event in history. Brzezinski's book
repeatedly
express "hope" for terror
events on a scale of
destruction and outrage and horror similar to Pearl Harbor.
In normal police detective work,
there's a word
to describe a
person who takes a "LUCKY"
action in
advance
of a suspicious crime, like taking out a
large insurance policy on a spouse or friend before their mysterious
death.
That
word is "suspect"
... for obvious reasons. A
thorough investigation probes this "suspect" to see if there is more evidence to connect
the suspect to the crime, beyond one "lucky"
coincidence.
In
the case of Sept 11, the crime scene is crammed with verifiable and
fairly unambigous evidence of complicity, but no investigation has occurred. Intelligent and obvious
questions are avoided ...
like herpes. (The Sept 11
Commission was assigned to look for "intelligence failures", not
"complicity", and the "lead investigators" are known to have been
operating within the same circles as the suspects -- oil, narcotics,
fraud, insider deals, and other criminality. They're partners.)
These premoniscient (future-telling)
statements and plans of PNAC and the Tri-Lateral Commission should have
led to the hottest intelligent public debate, discussion, controversy, in context rather than
isolated conjecture. Questions which are begging to be asked, are never
asked, so this pretension is
maintained (when
the question arises) that it was merely "good fortune" that Sept-11
occurred at just the perfect moment to coincide with their grand schemes to reshape the world to
suit global corporate and financial neo-colonial interests.
ALL our news media
personnel are not so utterly stupid
or illiterate that they could FAIL to recognize motive, nor so clueless as to
be unable to add means and opportunity to the motive. This
commitment to avoiding-the-obvious and dancing around it can ONLY be called
"intentional".
When a person under
interrogation continually dodges serious questions and changes the
subject, the
average
person KNOWS what this means -- subterfuge, LYING and GUILT.
THEY KNEW IN ADVANCE THEY'D
HAVE TO
LIE ABOUT IT. The whole point was to freak people out, to
TERRIFY.
TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT A PSYOP (psych operation) RUINS THE DECEPTION, as well as ruining the
plan. Simple facts could and should result in public
hangings. When?
(Unfortunately, most
of the "underground" ALSO treats
these
issues superficially or incoherently as well, even treating "official
leaks" designed as more distraction as if they represented genuine
"clues".)
Remember:
Hidden-but-openly-documented
evidence is of US covert/overt support for Al-Qaeda and their cousins
for 25 years, NOT
just the
Bush presidency and Republicans.
|
Forces
and
circumstances behind
September 11.
KEY
DATA POINTS,
documented
facts and
evidence:
Al-Qaeda created by US National
Security, CIA, with
help from countries who are current "allies in the War on Terror".
Al-Qaeda backed by US
from 1978 - 2001, bi-partisan support.
Ninety-minute attack, no defense
whatsoever
Two top
US attorneys who
provided extraordinary legal defense to
Al-Qaeda operatives around financial trail
White House and Counterterror
Intelligence, Military Chiefs roll out red carpet
for Al-Qaeda funder on Sept 11
Innumerable FBI warnings from field
staff blocked, SIX FBI agents blocked
and threatened
Warnings and signs from years past
consistently blocked,
including 14000 pages
Gaming the stock market prior to 9-11,
but no inquiry as to who knew.
Years of openly stated plans to take
over Middle East energy
reserves, to seize profits
Past history of CIA terrorism,
False-Flag operations, WW1, WW2, Gladio, Tonkin
Similarities to proven aspects of
Kennedy assassination coverup in the
media and govt
Roots of the CIA in collaboration with
actual NAZIS, prior to and
during WW2
Pentagon
plans for partial
militarization of civilian sector, tied to planned economic
destruction of the American Way of Life, and neo-liberal Global
Dictatorship under G8 leaders and corporate/financial elites
... and much much more
(should be seen as cumulative arguments) |
WE COULD STOP RIGHT HERE and HAVE ENOUGH
EVIDENCE TO DEMAND A
CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION ON THAT ONE QUESTION, WITHOUT MUCKING AROUND IN
OTHER EXTRANEOUS
DATA.
BUT LET'S PROCEED TO A FEW OTHER EXAMPLES OF COMPLICITY. (But don't
forget, they've
done it before.
This is a pattern.)
Weak,
weak, weak.
When
bringing up the question of Sept 11 being an inside job, probably the worst place to OBSESS
is the Towers
and Pentagon themselves, IMHO. This is because invariably, inane
"unanswered questions" will be asked (and sometimes
foolishly answered) about "where the bodies went", and other
stupid challenges.
Physics
is annoying to
argue when the variables are unknown, or when
people don't have a degree in Physics
and a propensity for lots of
algebra. These arguments therefore exclude probably 80% of the
population.
As Mark Robinowitz
said, with
"Political
Physics", for every Ph.D., there is an
equal and opposite Ph.D.
However,
while I agree with this first phrase
by Mike Ruppert,
I'm NOT
convinced of the 2nd phrase -->:
"we
are witnessing a sequential war to control the largest reserves ....
on a planet that is running out of oil."
Not that there are not serious issues with the catastrophe
itself.
For one, the absence of rational explanation about the lack of
response to not only known threats,
but to two, three, even FOUR known
hijackings in progress, long after "routine intercept" periods
had passed, so even the Pentagon was left defenseless. This just
boggles the mind, because it is SO ridiculous that the
Pentagon could not be defended.
One serious drawback
of
American culture is a conditioned
gullible reliance
on "experts", paralleled by a reliance on religious leaders (both
here and in Islamic culture), which induces an inability within
all but a small-to-medium-sized
portion of the public to trust themselves over authorities.
Anyone can stare at the
videos on TV (those
which
have not been withheld from the public), and comfortably assess
within themselves whether the "official story" is plausible or a
lie. Even if you take the
experts at face value, the collapsing buildings are certainly unusual,
and difficult to explain, no?
 Look at the relative lack of damage
to the entire structure
(besides
the crash and fire zone)
Towers EXPLODING NEAR
THE TOP and collasping/exploding/disintegrating down the sides
explosions and
collapse starting below
the damage
the short time prior
to total catastrophic failure of the steel frame (about one hour)
the impossible symmetry of
both collapses, requiring all sides to fail
simultaneously
the time OF the collapse itself (less than 20 seconds
per structure, < 0.2 per floor)
the sheer volume of
the
visible explosive force beginning the moment of collapse (and what looks like
explosive
"squibs")
the
still-alive victims visibly
standing in the open gash, not on fire
WTC7, allegedly damaged on the side,
crimping in the middle and collapsing
inward, so perfectly some experts allegedly called it a
"perfect 10" demolition ...
... download a photo or video
and
LOOK at the goddam things go down ... many other obvious abnormalities.
Hani
Hanjour, the man who allegedly hit the Pentagon could barely drive a
car, and could not fly a Cessna. Yes, he could
have improved a little, but not enough for the "stunt
flight"
(video) which
some experienced pilots doubted they
could perform. Without the
stunt flight, Hanjour would have hit Donald Rumsfeld and Dick
Cheney.
The
whole purpose of the stunt fight seemed to be to miss
the occupied area of the
Pentagon, and hit
the empty side,
under construction.
Yet people without some technical
background apparently feel
incapable of making sense of
this.
(Many
"educated"
people are more subservient to "experts" than reg'lar folks.)
Trust your own eyes and know that in "highly technical
terms",
the Laws
of Physics
cannot
be
suspended by
"Islamo-fanatics", no matter how fanatical. :-)
Your Eyes Don't Lie:
Common Sense, Physics, and the World Trade Center Collapse. Guest Jim
Hoffman, software engineer and research scientist
This mental barrier
is worsened by a flood of bogus
"alternate expert
opinion" which is apparently/obviously designed
to confuse
and mislead
by injecting fake arguments. (For some reason, the
stupidest arguments get the most coverage. Hmmm.)
|
Staff members characterized
Mr. Hanjour as polite, meek and very quiet. But most of all, the former
employee said, they considered him a very bad pilot. "I'm still to this day amazed that he
could have flown into the Pentagon," the former employee said. "He
could not fly at all."
However, when Baxter and fellow instructor Ben Conner took
the slender, soft-spoken Hanjour on three test runs during the second
week of August, they found he had trouble controlling and landing the
single-engine Cessna 172. Even though Hanjour showed a federal pilot's
license and a log book cataloging 600 hours of flying experience, chief
flight instructor Marcel Bernard declined to rent him a plane without
more lessons.
|
|
BRAVE
FBI agents
No,
other than the birth of Al-Qaeda, and that paper trail, one of the
better places to begin
might be the sworn testimony on the Tee-Vee of one FBI
agent that he sent seventy
warnings
and was ignored and obstructed seventy
times. Six or more other
FBI agents were
equally
ignored, but not just ignored. Their
work was subject to rewrites and
they were given reprimands
and threats
of reprisals for trying to stop 9-11, for digging into the
money
trail. These agents remained
isolated
and unaware of the concurrent and overlapping warnings of other FBI
agents.
Where did that money trail go? My guess would be right back to
the CIA that spawned and controlled Al-Qaeda. One agent appeared
on the cover
of Time,
amidst smokescreen controversy of "incompetence" and "restructuring"
and the "need for more funding, less
restrictions, more power".
|
My
Beef with
Chomsky
by Michael D. Morrissey, Sept 2000
|
DO
YOU HATE
LAWYERS?
 Next
I might stir this into the mix: two
major terrorism cases (1999 and 2002-3) involving money trails and
paper trails successfully SUPPRESSED thrown out, dismissed, blanket
legal immunity. This was handled by two top lawyers -- Chertoff
and Baker.
The
case Michael
Chertoff (now Dir
of Homeland Security) picked up has original online
records from Bergen County, back when the public didn't know his name,
but Ken Starr and the Whitewater team did.
 Baker grabbed the 2nd
case where he suppressed evidence on Saudis, and
this was described on MSNBC and CNN, but the main detail --- that Baker-Botts Law Firm = James A. Baker =
Bush family attorney and consultant --- was missing from both
reports. For details check the
index on my HOME
page. WHY
DID THEY DO IT??? Why did the media NOT tell us and raise a stink?
In the midst of propaganda supporting the Constitution-shredding USA PATRIOT Act,
which Chertoff largely
authored,
Chertoff suppressed an Al-Qaeda case.
These two "Bush
team" lawyers ain't no mushy lawyers for human rights or
minorities. They're supposed to be prosecuting
terrorism,
not running interference for defense.
(Although Baker IS the Saudis' lawyer.) No obvious political
feathers for helping these controversial clients. They didn't
need the money. The only plausible
answer is that these cases would have uncovered
evidence which would break the 9-11 psyop and implicate the
government, and had to be suppressed at any cost.
If not suppressed, important people would be heading to the gallows or
electric chair.
|
PLANNED
TERRORISM?
Hmmm.
Where to go next? Here's some choices.
Statements by current US
officials about their plans to instigate
terrorist acts (overseas, they imply),
ostensibly in order to catch the terrorists they instigate or bribe,
called P2OG. How about a foreign policy strategy book or two
highlighting the use of terror groups to shape the Middle East and Asia
to meet something they call "U.S. interests"? Which Americans'
interests are served
by more
terrorism??!
(Ask a
Nicaraguan, or
a Guatemalan, or a Salvadoran, or a Venezuelan, or a Columbian, or an
Argentinian, or a Vietnamese, or a Palestinian, ad infinitem.
Note: "The Jews" is not the correct answer to these questions, though
maybe a partial answer. It's far too big for "the Jews" unless
you
say "non-Jews" = "crypto-Jews", as some argue. But Israel wasn't
behind the CIA coups against Mossadegh of Iran, Arbenz of
Guatemala, Ho Chi Minh, nor many other cases.)
Examples of prior fake attacks, staged
attacks, false-flag attacks, etc.
Spanish-American War (Hearst news hyped
attack, with no proof)
Mexican War (Lincoln
demanded proof we were attacked)
World War 1 (Lusitania
instigated and allowed)
World War 2 (Pearl
Harbor instigated and allowed)
Operation Gladio (confirmed, CIA
staged terror attacks on civilians in Europe)
Cold War (fantastic
fearmongering over decrepit Third World country struggling to prosper)
Korea (S.
Korean troops and Japanese soldiers under US/UN control actually
instigated violence)
Operation Northwoods (serious plans to
stage terrorist attacks on American people, blocked by Kennedy)
Vietnam (Gulf
of Tonkin Incident never
happened,
and they KNEW it, 58,000 Americans dead)
Grenada, Nicaragua (a threat?!!!!)
Iraq, Gulf War (staged behind the
scenes by US Diplomats: Scowcroft, Joe Wilson, April Glaspie)
.. dozens of other examples
proof (internal
memos)
of other
serious LIHOP operations which were attacks on US people and
properties orchestrated
by the govt.
or here False Flag Operations
)
|
Tonkin
is one
irrefutable example of top US officials telling bald-faced lies to
the public to start a war which would kill over 58,000 Americans.
Tonkin was Lyndon
Johnson's "WMD's", totally fabricated. They don't care about us. Get
it? THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT ANY HUMAN SUFFERING.
We
might even go more historical, and note the reign of US terror against
it's
own citizens, under the Civil War (freeing the slaves
was a
very minor concern to Lincoln), under the Palmer Raids, the
McCarthy witchhunts, COINTELPRO
in the 70's, Kent State and Jackson State mass shootings, and the
ongoing US terror campaign known as the War on Drugs.
There
is additional proof -- not speculation
--- that this  false-flag
terror has been orchestrated by
the US against itself numerous times,
plus innumerable incidents
of covert/clandestine terrorism staged against foreign civilians.
Operation Gladio saw the CIA working with
Euro Intell for 40 years, bombing cafes and markets, blaming it on Left
wing groups, to prevent them from winning elections.
This physical violence and murder is is over and above the relentless
psychological
terror (as exposed by Jon
Stewart of the Daily Show) created by the fear-mongering
drumbeat of propaganda emanating
from both govt and news pundits. The deeper you look, the more disturbing it
is --- in terms of our level of
trust for those
running our lives -- or
hilarious if you have a sense of irony.
(Laughing about this might take some time.)
At what point
do a bunch
of trees make a forest? That's obviously subjective.
A forest is MUCH MORE than a bunch of trees, it is a
complex interlocking self-organizing ecosystem, a symbiotic whole.
MOTIVE
CLASS
WAR? THEM v. US?
Further
back, and from the angle of "war on poor workers and middle class", there
is
a continuous historical
pattern, from the Labor Wars of the 1800's against groups of
workers, the 1933
fascist coup plot againt President
Roosevelt and the US (which nobody knows
about despite Congressional hearings), US corporate support for
Hitler and Lenin, Allen and John
Dulles + Nazi liaisons, the
beginning of the Bush-Walker-Nazi dynasty
including Nixon, CIA Nazi
Files Released,
Vietnam, COINTELPRO,
all the way thru Sept 11 and Iraq with many
events in between. Is
our government working for Americans? Hell no!
THE
"F" WORD
One minor interruption
in the march to fascism and
extreme-anti-labor and pro-peace repression was the election of John F. Kennedy.
JFK was also an
avid Cold Warrior and no lightweight, but he had his limits.
Global
thermonuclear war and terrorist attacks waged on Americans were past
his limits. He stopped them, they stopped him ... DEAD. Not
only was his assassination a problem-solving measure
for fascists,
but a "Shock
and
Awe" event against the US
popular culture and minorities who (perhaps unjustifiably) adored him.
I'm open
to comments
and criticism on this viewpoint, but I think it works in a
nutshell, and there's much evidence and context to back it up.
THE
GLOBAL "F" WORD
Sept
11 is not a
single anomaly,
but a steady march in the direction
of a global fascist dictatorship by
a wealthy western ruling class,
imposed by the
political-economic leadership in the most effective manner
possible:
by tacit consent of the governed,
albeit consent which is manufactured thru
FEAR and a fabric
of
lies.
This sounds all theoretical, but there's much to understand about what "neo-liberalism" means and the history of
economic and social repression by a de facto ruling class in the United
States, especially pre-Roosevelt.
Terrorism
/ War on Terror / "War for survival" is obviously a project of the G8 nations
and their Intelligence,
albeit led
by the power brokers of the United States and Britain. Sept 11 is
an adjunct of Economic Globalization, the
use of fear to cower the masses into accepting total control, and the
criminalization of dissent.
"Al-Qaeda" has been used for similar
purposes in Yugoslavia under Clinton, and is being used elsewhere
today, places like Iraq, Iran, Syria, westen China, and Chechnya, as well as being blamed for
attacks in the western G8 nations.
The US War
on Terror is a War on Americans and a war on ALL people,
including the
middle and upper middle class, including low-level wealth like small
business, except the
very highest elite families.
The
'New' Cold War is the Same Old Scam.
13
Predictions for the War on Terror Acrobat PDF from a right winger
YOU CAN RETURN HOME 
NOW or read a few more minor points:
INTRODUCTION -
forces and
circumstances behind
September 11.
a few
more points
"Don't
look at the man
behind the curtain, Dorothy"
Party politics is a
non-starter, whether you hate
Republicans or hate Democrats, or neither.
It's not "all about
Bush" or even Neo-cons, nor is it "Clinton's incompetence".
Trust
me .. or your own brain: there was NO lack of competence.
There are hundreds
of
rational questions and disturbing answers about what really happened
on 9-11.
|
This covers both
Republican and
Democrat administrations, including "trustworthy" people like Jimmy "Habitat
for friggin Humanity" Carter,
who
once backed Indonesian genocide of E. Timor, and under whose admin the
Al-Qaeda Project was first launched.
How
did "they" slip past our $12 Trillion
defense
system?
Did
Saddam send Al-Qaeda
Sleeper Cells to spike the govt's coffee with valium?
Besides,
who is "they"? Evidence of any Islamic Terrorist network
which is independent of the one created by CIA is sketchy.
Brzezinski
said: There isn't a global
Islam. He's right.
Why
isn't
anyone in media mentioning these obvious
points?
"The
End
of the Constitution"TM and the beginning of the Martial
Law StateTM
--- is suggested by top military and politicians --- just to keep us
safe, mind you.
It's rolling out *NOW*
-- but to
be fully enacted upon the next "inevitable"
devastating terrorist
strike, probably nuclear or bio, we
will begin to "question
our own Constitution and militarize our country." Perhaps this is
fear-mongering for control, perhaps it's inevitable.
the "real problem": Americans
just have too much darn freedom for their own good. Do you
believe this?
"Most
people need to be told what to do." - Arnold Schwarzenegger.
We've had our 200-year
chance. We fought, made some gains, lost some battles. We
"rabble" are like farm animals who labor for food, but also are
self-directed to eat out, have
sex, pay taxes, and watch
TV. Those
of
wealth and power think we need husbandry and management from wise
elites - them.
They think we need some old-fashioned Tyranny --
the norm thoughout
history. (Oops, I meant "New
Freedom"TM)
EVERYTHING
from here into the future is about 9-11 ... forever!
That's
what THEY said. The
"War on Terror" will last our lifetimes, just like
the
"War on Drugs". The "Cold War" had to end when the Soviet
Union fell, but "TERRORISTS" are so fuzzy and undefined, this War can
go on endlessly.
Thousands of
dead and maimed
Americans
and tens of
thousands of dead and maimed Arabs are all due to 9-11.
Domestic budget cuts, corporate tax breaks,
new military
surveillance, Pentagon policing our private live are all about
the THREAT
of terrorism But the
President wanted NO investigation
(and he succeeded in that aim). Shouldn't we
at least peek
behind the curtain. |
I
present a tiny
compilation of key info, by others who
use with a lot of verifiable original footnotes and references. I just use web links in place of footnotes.
Questionable
disinfo-rubbish is sifted out to the best degree possible.
Minor revisions will continue indefinitely.
I include many
conservative
researchers,
partly for obvious socio-political considerations, because the spin
machine
has most
people
convinced that "only liberals hate Bush" and that's all this is
about. They say "conservatives
love Bush and trust the government"
-- and everyone else is
a partisan liberal
kook. Trad. Conservatives distrust govt.
I also include some commentators from a Legitimate
Left which is not
merely a front for the
Democratic corporatocracy.
...
INTRODUCTION, CONTINUED ...
Sometimes
I
spell Al-Qaida, sometimes Al-Qaeda.
PARTISAN
BIAS:
This is a test I use. If
people say "Bush is terrible, but Clinton was great" and "Nobody died
when Clinton lied", I know I'm dealing with a deluded Liberal Democrat.
1.5 million Iraqis died under Clinton, and more Yugoslavians, Sudanese,
etc. Madeline Albright told
us that 700,000 dead Iraqi children was worth
the price to punish Saddam.
These sadistic nutjobs should
be tortured and starved.
Some of my wonderful liberal friends think that creating a Federal Dept of
Peace will
somehow "solve the problems and misunderstandings that lead to
violence", when our top eschelon "rulers" were terrified of an olive
branch from Saddam that might ruin their war plans ... I really,
really hate to be so
cynical about their efforts at "waging
peace".
Media mouthpieces (other than typical blowhards) are hinting at calling
"Peace" statements "Sedition in a time of war", potentially
punishable by death. The writer was pointing at speeches
by Kerry and Dean, but those two extablishment pimps cannot be the real targets.
Hell, both Kerry and Dean wanted to expand
the Iraq War, draft troops to "win it". Their character assassinations may be
used as the precedent to apply to harsher
measures to mere civilians. It's been done before in US history,
and many times by foreign civilians targeted by US or CIA aggression,
so there's a precedent.
I don't think the DOP can
help create more understanding in a system owned by Fascists.
I borrowed this quote:
Would the Dept. of Peace have a
Bureau of Harmony and Understanding, Office of Sympathy and Trust
Abounding?
I note with some trepedation that the Dept.
oF War was created to Defend America. When the purpose
shifted to "naked imperialism", to ATTACK rather than DEFENSE, the
Dept. of War was renamed the Dept. of
Defense.
On
the
other hand, when Conservatives
say
they demand small government but DEFEND corporate welfare and
Republican crime and corruption, I know they really have no conservative principles.
They are either flacks or deluded on Limbaugh, O'Reilly and Hannity style of "toughness" over
substance.
IT
WOULD BE SILLY TO FOCUS ON MERE FINGER-POINTING
IN A ONE-PARTY SYSTEM MIRED IN CORRUPTION, run by secrecy, directed by
an unelected elite. Bush
certainly couldn't have planned this by himself.
Naming names IS
necessary, but not an end in itself.
Please
see this site not as
a final repository of information, but as a "reader's digest", plus
combining worthwhile clues for analysis that's not inch-deep.
The
main researchers I cite (along with their drawbacks) are:
(researchers who ultimately act like CIA operatives STILL have to put
out some solid info for credibility)
- Michel
Chossudovsky Prof. of Global
Economics, and all his footnotes,
Somewhat
Pedantic. Dunne criticizes his emphasis on a War on Iran, deeming it
unlikely due to US collaboration on Iraq, and
Chossudovsky's relations with Peak Oil propoenents, but Michel's data
and analysis around Brzezinski's Global Chessboard strategy is
well-supported.
- Fintan
Dunne, lone wolf, on breakfornews.com
- he called 9-11 a
Wag the WTC psy-op
from Day One, a "live" horror movie staged by US, British, Israeli, and
Arab Intelligence officials
and The G8
Managers for "Shock and Awe".
- Alex
Jones
rightwing talk host and all his high-level
guests - Historical info
and current analysis, dynamic documentary
films, but always a whacko
"poison pill",
especially for those who are not far-right ideologues. Twisted
over-emphasis
on Communism, seems like he's still fighting the Cold War. MOST LIKELY AN "OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD"
PLANT. The John Birch Society has traditionally been a
front for FBI/CIA counter-intelligence in America.
- Ralph
Schoenman,
his
partner Mya Shone, early JFK researcher and revolutionary truth-teller - Marxist, accurate.
Pedantic. Chomsky-esque style, but with more balls. Also, his
co-host Bonnie Faulkner.
- Michael
Ruppert fmr LAPD narcotics/homicide detective, ALMOST
CERTAINLY CIA. He's into
Peak Oil hysteria. He has introduced very good info on Brzezinski, The
Grand Chessboard, and short sales of stock. Valuable
contributions -- esp on how drugs, arms, illegal money-laundering
capital flows is aligned with Wall Street.
- Daniel
Hopsicker
on madcowprod.com fmr ABC
news
producer and investigative journalist, Good documentaries.
Why does he
say "Saudi's
fault" instead of "Saudi
complicity with
CIA"? Why does he seemingly take Michael Moore's and
Richard
Perle's position, which is to punish Saudi Arabia? Why does he
insist that the Al-Qaeda Hijackers were REAL, when his own evidence
indicates they're not? I think he's a fake with some good info.
- Peter Mayer at Serendiptity.li has some
excellent info on CIA - plus
anti-Zionist pages, veering into a
Jew-hating stench.
- various "rogue" FBI agents who have
attempted to tell the truth about what they know (limited hangout?), and
- various
other sourced articles from newspapers and top publications such as the
Financial Times, Harper's, and strangely Vanity
Fair, backing up
less well known journalists.
In
other
words, someone for every taste.
STOP
THE LIE is another good overview
website, maybe than mine, but I have
better graphics, sarcasm, and links, and good historical context.
I
picked my own selected news links. By
using an intuitive set of "keywords". anyone
can
verify or supplement information using
Google
or other search engines.
Pay attention to using "multi-word
phrases" (in quotes) vs. individual words (not in quotes).
My email address is several pages in, so people must at least review
the material before sending hate mail.
|
|
