TakeOverWorld

enable Javascript in settings to see Menus at top

PRESENTING evidence of a TERRORISM RACKET

It's very difficult to *prove* Sept 11 was an inside job.

It's a piece of cake to prove the official story is riddled with falsehoods.
Beyond the "Official 9-11 Tinfoil Conspiracy Racket"

The first anomaly is that President Bush ordered NO investigation of the September 11 crimes.
WHAT??!! Everyone knows that, right?

Imagine the cops find a dead body, and then a note from an estranged spouse about hiring a hitman. Is that proof? No. Is it evidence? Hell yes!
Now imagine the spouse is a cop, and imagine that the cops order no murder investigation. Has that ever happened near you?
Imagine that three banks were robbed today by teams of gunmen (19 total). Cops waited 90 minutes to show up, too late to help. One bank next door to a police station, robbed in broad daylight. Now imagine the police chief states that they ARE going to ATTACK THIS CRIME WAVE but they are NOT going to have any investigation whatsoever (later conceding under pressure to have a limited investigation of the robberies). Chief sends his detectives to a nearby county ... or country. Oh No!! DON'T INVESTIGATE

That defies common sense and rationality. I mean, DUH!! No one with a lick of street sense or common sense would accept that. Only a person suffering from some kind of crippling naïveté would let a weird excuse like that fly in their daily affairs. The public would demand results.

"Liberals" are often accused of being naïve idealists, but "Conservatives" (especially the super-religious whose lives depend on purging rational doubts -- I'm not being nasty, "religious faith" means a partial rejection of reason) can be equally zombied by this suspension of skepticism. Maybe most the public was mostly too mystified by the "shock and awe" of that day to add it up. I didn't question it for a while, myself, even though I knew it was a gift to the Republican agenda (both parties).

I would challenge anyone to defend this. Anthrax? Which came from US govt labs? This is why a thorough investigation of Sept 11 was blocked by Presidential decree?
History Channel Admits Anthrax Attacks are an Inside Job

Blocking an investigation is sufficient to *prove* that something is seriously wrong with the official story. "Obstruction of justice" and "interfering with an investigation" are serious crimes, but when the orders come from the top, it has a different context.

Marketing 101: When persons with a kooky far left or kooky far right perspective associate themselves with a serious political analysis of Sept 11, "normal" people are instinctively driven away by gut instinct. That's exactly how modern symbolic marketing works -- like associating a product with sex or love -- except in reverse.

How do people feel about 9-11 questions after hearing from "Truthers" through a love-drenched hippie of the "911-yoga movement" or from sneering Jew-haters?

Repulsed, usually. It's a subliminal truth-repellant.
Some "Truthers" may be ordinary kooks, some may have an ulterior motive.

This is exactly what I'd do if I were CIA.
No need to suppress the truth. Just marginalize it.

'Thought Crime' Legislation of HR 1955, S 1959 DISCLAIMER
Huey from Boondocks makes a political statement. (flash video)

DIVX huey911.avi smaller WMV huey911.wmv
install Adobe Flash Player to view in-page videos
click pause and wait to load if your Internet connection is slow and it breaks up

TIP: When clicking on Links, try to [Right-Click] and [Open in New Window] instead of going forward and back.
for Javascipt popups ... just click them and close.
I have preserved some others' webpages as MHTML files, lest they disappear.
They work with Internet Explorer, but Firefox may need this MHT extension.

PRO-TERRORISM

Some US officials wanted terror bloodbath, in writing, prior to Sept 11.

www.Takeoverworld.info/proterrorism.html (updated: February 11, 2008)

If you overheard someone advocating the need for an attack on America, to launch a global revolution, would you report them to the authorities? What if they were the authorities?

Since the mid-90's, and earlier, some public officials were writing in scholarly journals (that few people read) that Americans NEEDED to experience a severe and terrifying crisis - a bloodbath - necessary to drive Americans to support twin policies of war and domestic repression. These propagandists (with direct influence inside the CIA and Pentagon) described interim goals and tactics, which matched those stated by "Osama bin Laden", "former" CIA and Pentagon asset. Namely the use of terror for political change.

What was it our govt said about people who support terrorism?
Aren't they "with the terrorists"?
WHY DOESN'T EVERYONE KNOW THIS?

PERMANENT WAR - STAKES FOR WORKING PEOPLE
by Ralph Schoenman -- tightest analysis of entire War on Terror series
quotes from Brzezinski's Grand Chessboard book
"For America, the chief geopolitical prize is Eurasia..."
"That puts a premium on maneuver and manipulation ..."
The Green Peril - Creating the Islamic Fundamentalist Threat (Cato Institute)
by Leon Hader of the Jerusalem Post - 1992
Celebrate Reagan's AL-QAEDA and TALIBAN DAY on March 21
How Jimmy Carter and I started the Mujahedeen
Osamagate - when did the US stop working w Al-Qaeda? How about "never"?
amnesty for Bin Laden : LET OSAMA STAY FREE
ALI MOHAMED - the protected Al-Qaeda mastermind
... when Benazir Bhutto's was killed, the security was handled by an Osama aide,
who worked for Pakistan's ISI and Intelligence ... which is run by our CIA.
FBI agents claim "obstructed and thwarted" before 9-11
top investigators: US Government Destroyed the WTC Evidence
ISRAEL'S SACRED TERRORISM (google) (local)- by an ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER!!
pro-NAZI HISTORY of America
Conservatives vs. Neo-Conservatives & Straussians (September 6, 2007)
Bush: President-for -Life??
CLINTON-BUSH PHOTO MONTAGE
Loose Change is one example tainted and kooky info about 9-11, showing both legit and fake info.

Some of the most comprehensive sites on physical evidence regarding 9-11.

Google wtc7 hoffman or go to

http://911research.wtc7.net/

http://911review.com/
www.ae911truth.org Architects and Engineers (over 200 professionals)

Jim Hoffman is a strong, sane critic of other researchers and fakers.
http://911research.wtc7.net/letters/democracynow/index.html
A simple introduction to the fake vs. legit controversy. http://911proof.com/

All about the War on Terror and Iraq War by Aaron MacGruder of Boondocks.

Much profanity, voice is the Samuel Jackson, using lines from "Pulp Fiction" in new context, remarks by Donald Rumsfeld.

Don't tell me that people who WANTED America to be attacked and want a NEW 9-11 AGAIN are patriotic, while I'm a scumbag commie traitor for criticizing them. It's not "unpatriotic" to publicize factual facts, nor to point out impossible or implausible stories. So I try to vet what I post.

Many people who claim to LOVE AMERICA and who think of themselves as 'patriotic', deeply hate America as it is for being a messy, argumentative, liberal democratic constitutional republic of Laws, instead of being a mighty, strong, proud, mythological empire under a powerful dictator.

American politicians from Brzezinski to Reagan and many more EMPLOYED and SUPPORTED Islamic Radicals and Muslim Bros (Al-Qaeda) for roughly the same reasons the Rolling Stones hired the Hell's Angels for security guards at Altamont ... but Hell's Angels are not known to be ideological anti-communists.

Other reasons: "We need a common enemy to unite us." - Condoleeza Rice in 2000, talking Straussian

The argument that the global octopus known as CIA could not have done this, but rag-tag terrorists with boxcutters scored 4/4 on the hijackings and crashes, is simply laughable. "An intelligence service is the ideal vehicle for a conspiracy." - Allen Dulles

The "Al-Qaeda Ministry" of Osama Bin Laden and Ayman Zawahiri is like the shadowy "Christian Broadcasting Network of the Muslim World", both with acknowledged CIA connections and a history of terror operations. The studios from which Al-Qaeda broadcasts their announcements certainly appear to be of CBN quality, at least, and as much into demagoguery as Pat Robertson and his gang.

The online "investigation" of the 9-11, and public debate has, in a manner reminiscent of the JFK assassination, been hampered by an obsession on (valid) physical evidence and anomalies, the kind that physicists and 'expert witnesses' can hash out endlessly, and which sidelines the average person with too many details. The public might not agree on exactly what happened to JFK and how Oswald's rifle fired, but some things are very clear. For one thing, Oswald was in no way a "lone nut" or commie. Documents and govt & civilian witnesses have him connected w CIA and FBI and a right wing cop.

The best of the physical 9-11 stuff is probably the simplicity of the unexplained collapse of the third building, WTC7, a topic not mentioned at all by the 9-11 Commission, and and left unclarified by NIST. One of the NIST heads is calling for a new investigation. NIST Engineer Caught Lying! FEMA & NIST's "Pancake Theory" is a Lie. Some 11,000 scientists signed a petition protesting Bush admin "politicizing" science, not even in relation to 9-11, incl. NIST which part of Commerce Dept. Popular Mechanics - owned by old-school yellow journalists Hearst News which faked news back to USS Maine - replaced their science staff before their"debunking 9-11". PM refused to answer simple questions from conservative Charles Goyette, until he hung up on them.
The trickiest subject is the Pentagon, no clear video evidence from cameras, lots of questionable theories asserted.
I'll leave the detailed debate about whether a building can flow through solid concrete and steel like it's dropping thru air and disintegrate to dust to other 9-11 sites mentioned above. No need to say "mee too".

Lost in endless volleys about the

WTC7 collapse, and what Larry Silverstein might have really meant by "pull it", is the story about A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard who worked for DeutscheBank-A.B. Brown, a firm which was accused of handling a huge spike in shorting of stock on AA and United, put options ("bets" that these stocks would fall) 1-3 days prior to 9-11. The WSJ reported it. Congress and the DoJ declined to investigate. [Source: Herzliyya International Policy Institute for Counterterrorism (ICT) (Israel)] Krongard was appointed by DCI George Tenet on March 16, 2001 to serve in the newly created role of Executive Director of the CIA. Krongard later advocated amnesty for Bin Laden, and Bush agreed that Bin Laden is not important. What are the odds? Now "Buzzy" consults for Blackwater, while his brother Howard "Cookie" Krongard is IG over at State, obstructing the Blackwater investigation.
House Oversight & Gov't Reform Cmte. Hearing on the State Dept. Inspector General (oops, he said Buzzy did not work for BW, then switched)

Insider_Trading_911_10.avi Insider_Trading_911_5.wmv

On Sept 15, 2001, The New York Times reports that Mayo Shattuck III has resigned, effective immediately, as head of the Alex Brown (A.B.) unit of Deutschebank previously run by Krongard.

NOTE: The Krongard story is about German finance, known to have ties to a Nazi past, and ties to the CIA, which was formed by Nazi financer Allen Dulles and William Sullivan with help from Nazi SS officer Reinhard Gehlen. Another institution with a heavy Nazi past is ... surprise ... Deutsche Bank! (Note: to satisfy visiting anti-Semites, I do agree that there is much evidence of Zionist collaboration with Nazis against Euro Jews, and about Israel and Sept 11. Fox News reporter Carl Cameron did a 4 part special on Israel and 9-11, but Mossad did not "trick" the CIA and NSC and NORAD. Look at Clean Break. Fascism is fascism, regardless of race, religion, or nationality. Zionist Nationalism is as ugly as any other form of ultra-nationalism and

super-patriotism.)

By this time, the 9-11 Debate is leaving Tinfoil Hat World, as more and more military and scientific people are speaking out.

It's hard to explain concretely what each physical anomaly alone proves, but what are the odds of ALL these events converging? This is just the TIP of the iceberg of U.S. complicity in 9-11. It helps to know that not only Sept 11, but JFK and RFK, MLK, Gulf of Tonkin, and

many other events in U.S. history were tainted by extraneous facts, destruction of evidence, eyewitnesses threatened and killed, "no finger-pointing" orders (Cabell in 63, Goss in 2001), etc.

Note: many good Americans and even war heroes going back to 1791 were branded "terrorists" and "insurrectionists" for dissenting about injustice.

There is also an overwhelmingly obvious case for a "Standdown" that even some hardcore skeptical young veterans could not resolve or dispute, like the fact that it was even possible for a 767 to circle over the Pentagon before striking. Could you have flown a circle over the Pgon on 9-10 or any other day, let alone on 9-11 during the crisis?

But much of this volley of physical evidence inquiry is unnecessary, or at best premature, and is often utilized in pointless bickering and diversion (plane vs. no plane). I believe the foundation of any 9-11 research must first show cause for suspicion. Contextual and documentary evidence, like Osamagate, or Permanent War, reveals a much clearer story, whereas physical evidence is (significantly) disconnected from context and purpose, which costs credibility. This disconnectedness is an important "cover" for whacko conspiracy theories from the far right, as usual. 2 + 5 = 4.

Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth and Pilots for 911 Truth, they have much more credibility with discussing physical evidence and engineering than either ME or "Philosopher of Science, James Fetzer", but the real experts don't get TV face time. Instead, many people who exemplify the worst stereotype of "conspiracy theorist" get top-slotted on Fox for their 5 minutes of Ridicule.
Some have expressesed a strong suspicion that the culprits pre-orchestrated their ALIBI+CONFUSION system, which must include son-of-a-Bircher Alex Jones. John Birch Society founded a domestic spy agency company, to collect information for Intelligence agencies and other private groups in the 70's and 80's, with links to Ollie North during Iran-Contra and Joe McCarthy's sidekick Ray Cohn. Jones seems to be practically embedded in the NWO he claims to be fighting, but Birch itself is cross-linked with their supposed arch-enemy, the "communist" Council on Foreign Relations, a global "chamber of commerce".

For example, one whole subset of the JFK assassination is focused on nitpicking over the physical improbability of Oswald, or someone else with Oswald's alleged skills, or lack thereof, being able to fire his bolt-action rifle three times in the alloted time frame, while maintaining accuracy and suppressing adrenalin shakes, to hit the moving target, which was a President, not a test dummy. A Math major might say "too many unknown variables". In the 1976 House hearings, much time and hoopla was given to a graphical study of the interpretation of acoustical gunshot echoes from a corroded tape recording of a crappy microphone on a cop's lapel, which allegedly proved multiple shooters from opposite directions. Did it? Maybe, maybe not, but it led to more technical disputes and didn't really convince anyone who was not already convinced.

On the other hand, Oswald's FBI Payroll #179 or S172 per an assistant district attorney Bill Alexander in Dallas is pretty damning, even if Hosty refutes it. So is his CIA employee number of 110669, per Dallas District Attorney Henry Wade. Timeline. Fairplay for Cuba seems to be CIA-funded group with Oswald as sole member, yet he got his own TV interview. (Just for comparison's sake, Cindy Sheehan had millions of supporters, and the only full TV interviews with her I can find are CourtTV, Canadian CNBC, and a Dutch TV station.)

“The 9/11 Truth Movement gives one insight why the term ‘conspiracy theorist’ came to be shorthand for ‘discredited whacko’ in the invisible guidebook of mainstream media. Suddenly, it's not hard to understand why the obvious anomalies in the JFK assassination never received proper attention in accepted media channels.
If you have just as many nutty theories about the driver of the limo turning around and shooting JFK as you have honest inquiries about the real probability of multiple shooters, the wheat drowns in the chaff.”
-- Sander Hicks
(An actual internal memo was written by CIA to agents on how to refute JFK theories CIA Employs Propaganda Assets to Refute Warren Comm Critics, which includes falsities such as Oswald being a 'loner' and 'stupid', rather than a highly-trained Marine/intelligence officer.)

Factors that were ignored or downplayed include government documents showing an ongoing relationship between "lone nut" Oswald and Intelligence, one item which was found in the Warren Report appendix. One of these was a loan given to Oswald by the US Embassy in Moscow to help him move back to the US from Russia, long after he denounced America and "joined" the Reds (KGB believed he was CIA). The office for Oswald's "communist activities" (Fairplay for Cuba) was shared with an extreme anti-communist cop (Banister), who worked with FBI and Office of Naval Intelligence. There's more of that, but probably the most dramatic is the

video (wmv) of a Secret Service agent

vigorously protesting (avi) being ordered to back off Kennedy's Limo and STOP protecting the President, moments before Kennedy's head exploded. This video was withheld for years, the Zapruder film withheld to 1975.

Issues which involve a lot of numbers and details, like questions about the melting or softening point of thick steel couplings and braces, and the nature of the specific hardware and building design, is lost on the average observer and 6th grade readers. People who watch daytime soap operas and dramatic movies look at the overall context and relationships of the characters, and draw conclusions about who is cheating on who, or

killing. This site is an attempt to serve both well-educated and lightly-educated readers and viewers.

You don't need a physics degree to understand what's up. (political hiphop)

"God is on your side" - A pep talk to Al-Qaeda (↓↓ watch ↓↓)
One Degree of Separation between the generic "Islamic mujahideen" warriors, the Taliban and United Front (two US proxies), and Saudi-based Al-Qaeda, in terms of CIA support for all of them.

Our National Security Advisor addressing Al-Qaeda.
install Adobe Flash Player to view in-page videos
WMV-1mb WMV-3mb WMV-6mb AVI-DIVX-4mb Real Video
Thanks to "SUPER", I was able to convert Real Vid to MPG-VCD and then other formats.

Osama & Al 'Qaeda's Afghanistan escape - Hersh local AVI, lo-fi WMV
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_BS83BmTIQ

One-Page quickie

Five Pages Q & A
DEBATE POINTS - why War on Terror is bogus
EVERYTHING is about 9-11 ... forever!

We need to look behind the curtain. (Loose Change et al. is not the place to look.)
The real story can be revealed thru US policy, better than airplane scraps, or lack thereof.
Sept 11 conspiracy arguments first emerged from RIGHT wing Christian Conservatives and the Patriot movements.
These are Clinton-haters, some for the right reasons, like Clintons being "in bed" with the Bush family.
Admittedly, some 9-11 arguments are whacky, but some are valid points.
Most of The Left, even 'radicals' like Zmag and Counterpunch and Chomsky, IGNORE or VEHEMENTLY REJECT the idea that
a govt which planned and carried out horrendous atrocities on civilians in the past would dare to do such a thing to Americans.
Again.
Now the Corp Media is trying to spin it as a Liberal 'Rosie' Bush-hating thing.

Feeling insufficiently patriotic lately? Defensive?

There's been a lot of talk about the "Blame America First" crowd. Were you aware that "blame America first" is a pun on the name of the original "America First Committee" which had strong crossover with the pro-Hitler movement in America and with the American Nazi Party? They wanted to overthrow the American government. They didn't hate America - they hated our FREEDOM and democracy.
Although some like Pat Buchanan defend them as mere patriotic anti-comms, one prominent member spoke of "Good Old Hitler" and worse.
(There's a huge difference btw being antiwar with regards to Iraq vs. Nazi Germany. Many antiwar people in the 1940's - not the genuine pacifists - were avidly pro-Nazi. People against this "War on Terror" want to stop ALL fascism, including our Al-QaedaProject, also including the White House, Pentagon, and CIA.)

Some person named "Cadeveo" said:
"Occam’s Razor simply says that in choosing between explanations, one should prefer the simplest one that accounts for all the data. And here’s the thing, often the folks who evoke O.R. most often and mechanically go for the first half of the razor – simplest explanation – without really remembering the second part of O.R. It’s just “simpler” to put your blinders on and ignore all the evidence that facile pseudo-rationalism of the James Randi kind is uncomfortable with, so your explanations can remain “simple.” Here’s the other thing, too – O.R. only prescribes (and by no real axiomatic authority) for a “preference” in explanations; it makes no claim about a simpler explanation being a more accurate or truthful one.
How you use Occam's Razor depends on what data your reality tunnel allows for and what data it is incapable of perceiving as such."

Why Sept 11 is still important:
a] Perpetual war for 100+ years into the future, slated to end NEVER, which is based off Sept 11, must be derailed. THEY say 9-11 is important, and reference it loudly or by assumption - and the Establisment "Liberals" (ill-liberals?) agree. Do you remember the ridiculous "Have you forgotten?" theme (meme, i.e. thought-virus) that emerged immediately, while the ground was still smoldering, to shame pacifists, silence critics, and shame skeptics?

b] Promote understanding of PSY-WAR used against the People, psy-op events to Shock and Awe Americans, govt trickery, PR, fakery, emotional manipulation and blackmail, etc.

Clarification can counter our

gullibility and prevent attacks, promote rational skepticism. (Irrational/ridiculous skepticism is another PR trick to discredit all skeptics.)

c] The ability to CREDIBLY debunk Sept 11, may help people drop tacit support for the plans of the Military-Industrial-Finance-Media-Security-Infotainment complex. Credibility is more important than a smorgasbord of valid details. Even if they think Bush's "War on Terrorism" is overblown, or agree with critics that it is a war on a tactic (guerilla warfare/terrorism), most people still believe that the general paradigm of "terrorism by Al-Qaeda" is genuine. This foggy area keeps people scared, angry, divided, fighting over reality.

d] Possibility of "monkeywrenching" the march to totalitarian global corporate tyranny by loudly rejecting the premise behind the "security state" (i.e. police state).

A new "Official" 9-11 investigation to solve it? Don't hold your breath. It's already solved. Maybe not every last detail, but close enough. Even prosecutors don't need every detail. Many of us know what did not happen and lots about what did, but 9-11 will never be honestly exposed in any official national capacity. By whom?
Who would bring charges? Conyers had his supporters arrested. Pelosi? Threats, no action. Rangel? Clinton? Rahm Emmanuel's helping Republicans WIN. (Kucinich sort of 'gets it', but he's a minority of ..one?)
Evidence would be intentionally polluted, weak evidence under a microscope, inquiry misdirected. This is how EVERY oficial investigation is handled. WE the People must know and understand this game, and it must be a majority or large minority. Nobody guilty is going to prison for 9-11, only innocent goat herders and taxi drivers who make up 86% of Guantanamo detainees.

The guilty will never be brought to justice, unless our current system is overturned. Unless We-the-People get on the same page and decide to overthrow the existing power relations, and not just the official government, Bushco and assorted henchmen have all the power and protection they need. "Winning" two elections they lost is one strong indication that the Power Elite wanted and needed them in. Bush bought 100,000 acres in Paraguay, a standard Nazi hideaway. Just in case.

Our Constitutional system was designed with wealthy landowners in mind, according to James Madison's Federalist Papers. Since then, it has been twisted and distorted to bizarre proportions and shapes. The Law applies strictly to ordinary people, but government and corporate chieftains regularly skate out of serious criminal penalties for serious crimes. Insofar as Bush and Cheney, and even Clinton to an extent, and many others, they could certainly be indicted and convicted for criminal treason, for clear violation of the public trust they swore to uphold, to protect America and defend the Constitution.

    Article II, Section 4 states, "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." Treason - aiding enemies of the U.S. (Air Force Colonel says "Bush Knew" about 9/11 mht) or "levying war" against the U.S. - and bribery are pretty straightforward. "High crimes and misdemeanors" is a phrase taken from 14th century Britian which was defined as "an injury to the state or the system of government" which included "corruption, misapplication of funds, abuse of official power, neglect of duty, and actions interfering with Parliamentary prerogatives."

President Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution.
Bush Executive Order: Criminalizing the Antiwar Movement

    According to Alexander Hamilton, impeachment included "those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of public trust. They are of a nature which may be ... denominated POLITICAL, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself." An important distinction is in order here. A "high crime and misdemeanor" does not necessarily mean an actual crime as set forth in our criminal code, although such a crime can be grounds for impeachment. According to Holtzman and Cooper (Holtzman is a former Congresswoman and member of the Nixon impeachment panel), "the key [key here meaning impeaching for high crimes and misdemeanors] is whether the conduct is a grave abuse of power or subversion of the Constitution." Furthermore, the term "maladministration" was rejected by the framers for "high crimes and misdemeanors" because they were concerned it could open the door for an abusive Congress. The phrase thus provides the necessary means for impeaching a president who may not have committed bribery or treason but still acted against the state or system of government.

    In sum, impeachment is warranted when a president or other civil officer abuses his/her official powers or neglects official responsibilities in ways that threaten our state, our system of government as established by the Constitution, and potentially our society and way of life.
Al Qaeda and the "War on Terrorism" - Chossudovsky
Klinton helps Al-Qaeda in Kosovo, Bush completes Kosovo, Kosovo Spin, Serbia says Intl Law violated, Kosovo real plan

This TREASON has gone far beyond mere impeachment, and that's not just angry partisan rhetoric about "dissent = treason".

That document needs serious reforms to move power DOWN to the public level, but a risk is that the Constitution will be outright replaced by more overt tyranny. We need to restore Human powers and remove fallacious Corporate Rights of Personhood that real criminals hide behind and use to run our government and economy. Ridicule and humor is one tactic used against dissidents, as cited by J.E. Hoover of the FBI. Let's use it to expose them. Sept 11 is hilarious ... except for al the dead people.

Only ONE key fact leads me to ask whether Sept 11 might NOT have been an inside job. This the matter of the deaths of 658 employees of Cantor-Fitzgerald, with Marsh-McClennan US losing 300, Morgan-Stanley losing about 40, and Merrill-Lynch losing "virtually none". Cantor Fitzgerald is one of 23 primary dealers who are permitted to trade U.S. government securities directly with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Not your average expendable humans. C-F also interfaces with the Pentagon to plan wars.

It is not the human loss of over 3000 innocent dead victims and many permanently injured that leads me to question this "inside job" premise (so what! Johnson and Nixon killed 58,000 Americans in Vietnam [plus 4 million Asians], under full knowledge that Gulf of Tonkin was a lie) but rather it is the deaths of so many high-level market and money analysts -- this is the main or maybe the only factor that leads me to doubt a 9-11 conspiracy. further discussion here

Here's a

video by four widows, three husbands worked for Cantor-Fitz:

www.911pressfortruth.com
This is the BEST 'conservative' (i.e. understated) documentary I've seen. Nothing outlandish or questionable. Sad to say, I guess their high-level husbands' lives were considered expendable by the Elites, who needed them for political props.

The rest of this website is about all the other factors, which strongly confirm a conspiracy. This includes well-documented evidence of many previous conspiracies to murder Americans for political purposes, and killing other random civilians, some clearly were enacted, some modified, some arguably in draft planning stages. (A written, signed plan li121ke Operation Northwoods IS a murder conspiracy, and high treason as well, even though McNamara and JFK blocked them from unleashing it in 1962-3.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IygchZRJVXM

A little more BACKGROUND here .............or move on to the 9-11 EVIDENCE below.

Let's face facts on how the Elite Rulers see us - as "the rabble" and "a mob".

THEY are Wise, Intelligent Elites. THEY have no use for morality which is silly and a barrier to taking decisive (brutal) action, and they consider religion a pious fraud, but useful for manipulation. WE are VULGAR and STUPID SCUM and MORONS. This is the Straussian neo-Conservative viewpoint, but "liberal" elitists like Brzezinski of Rockefeller's Tri-Lateral Commission echo that same view with more tactful or more evasive rhetoric.

PHOTO MONTAGE: CLINTON+BUSH

THEY need to keep us stupid and confused. LYING is an important part of leadership. We morons should NEVER be allowed to question their judgment --- or their honesty -- and they must set an example of ridicule or punishment if we do. We must be kept obedient, passive, demoralized serfs who look to them for protection and survival. (In a "democracy", limited dissent is actually a useful pressure release valve.) Sometimes they rely on fear and terror and grief, sometimes on other extremely sophisticated psychological conditioning techniques (tee-vee) --- except for the real "suckers" among us who can be motivated to serve them through the application of overt religious and patriotic psychobabble. SORRY TROOPS. That's what THEY consider you when they use you. (Kissinger quote in box above.)

One big point of fascism has always been to redirect economic class conflict over work and poverty into nationalistic solidarity against an outside enemy -- Jews, Arabs, Blacks, anyone vulnerable. Condi Rice stated "we need a common enemy" back in 2000. Fascist concept.

General Prosperity and Happiness for "the masses" amounts to "Vulgar Decadence", in their worldview. What happened to "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness", in the Declaration of Independence? Pain and Grief and Human Sacrifice (to benefit their rule) is Heroic and makes "us" strong. That's why WAR is GOOD and natural. They even called Pearl Harbor (and 9-11) lucky events -- LUCKY! -- because of how war and militarization affects society. Even naïve people realized Sept 11 was a blessing for Republicans, but actually a blessing for the entire ruling class.

If you don't believe that's what they believe about us, click on my Global Conquest page (www.takeoverworld.info) and read what they say.

THE MAIN POINT I DISCOVER IS THAT SEPT 11 WAS/IS FUNCTION OF {popup->LONGSTANDING U.S. FOREIGN POLICY AND DOMESTIC POLICY, WAS AND IS A KEY COMPONENT OF THE EXPANDING GLOBAL ECONOMIC MODEL, POVERTY (Michael Hudson) for most everyone including most AMERICANS), and THE ELITES' DESIRE FOR TOTALITARIAN CONTROL. This control is being rolled out, through psychological warfare (fear and propaganda), but also partly through legislation and actual police state deeds (below). The Pentagon says the point of the War on Terror is "globalization".

SEPT 11 WAS PLANNED FOR THIS PURPOSE, along with previous acts of terrorism in the U.S., which were ALSO CARRIED OUT by a Global INTELLIGENCE network. Although some incidents used Arab patsies, CIA black ops has tentacles deep in international Intell. The lines between intell vs. organized crime have long been blurred. Esp. considering the role of Nazis in forming CIA.

YES, the common sense reaction to Sept 11 could be the "War on Terror", plus some urgent and tough domestic "security measures"
... IF you take the whole story at face value. But Americans don't really understand who we're dealing with in US power circles, their history, their character. Perhaps you thought the Pentagon, FBI, and CIA and National Security State (

Parenti on Sec State) were created to protect ordinary Americans. Perhaps you take the whole

"Arab threat" at face value.
Motive, means, opportunity, relationships, and past history (modus operandi or here) -- this is what a detective would investigate. That and the paper trails and financial trails.

"SECURITY" HAS ALWAYS MEANT SECURITY FOR THE ARISTOCRACY, FOR ELITES AND/OR FOR BIG CAPITAL. Security is usually against the threat of

internal unrest. This is the definition of "Security State". AMERICA'S SECRET POLICE: FBI COINTELPRO in the 1990s THIS GEOPOLITICAL ANALYSIS IS FAR MORE RELEVANT THAN WHETHER BOMBS WENT OFF (looks like they did) OR IF A MISSILE WAS SUBSTITUTED FOR A PLANE (witnesses say it wasn't, but maybe both) OR WHETHER 'BUSH KNEW' (sure he did, but he's a middle manager, the entire Nat Security apparatus 'knew', including Kerry (Senate Frgn Rel) and Clinton ... it makes no difference). IT'S NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY WHEN THEY SPELLED OUT THEIR PLANS UP FRONT. TOO BAD AMERICANS DON'T READ. Some CONSERVATIVES were talking about this in mid 1990s, but .. ah ... things were different ... the President was the hate-able Bill Clinton!!

Here is a silly analogy that is a good analysis of the "9-11 Truthiness Movement", as told to a fledgling 9-11 skeptic (paraphrased):
Imagine the facts about 9-11 are a handful of Tic-Tacs. But those Tic-Tacs are buried in a steaming pile of dog manure, called "9-11 Truth Movement". How many times is John Q. Public or Jane Q. Public going to stick their face in the steaming pile of dog manure to dig out the Tic-Tacs of Truth so they can have fresh breath? (props to Hawkwind at www.breakfornews.com forum)

What does that mean? (Tic-Tacs CONTINUED)

My original intent was simply to collect and organize all this confusing information on 9-11 in one place. Stacking up a huge pile of facts and allegations was relatively easy. Editing for relevance, concision, and priority, and weeding out falsity and ambiguity, that is far more difficult, time-consuming, ONGOING. This has gotten LENGTHY, but I try to summarize, supporting concision with details. Thanks for patience and understanding. Send advice, please.

email ME