Essay:
Scientology: Soul Hackers
|
|
|
|
This
copyrighted paper by Caroline Letkeman
can be found here
Refund and Reparation
- Essay: Scientology: Soul Hackers
http://www.carolineletkeman.org/writings/soulhackers.html
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=scientology+transference
and is only
presented here as a valuable reference in case it disappears from it's original source
due to aggressive and litigious Scientology. This is my borrowed
copy w minor edits of emphasis and clarifying obscure terminology like
"MEST".
with deep thanks to Caroline Letkeman.
My overall summary of Caroline's and
other info with video links is posted HERE.
As a former auditor of the upper
levels of Scientology, my exit (Caroline's exit)
brought with it an attempt to find a technical explanation for the
subjective effects that Scientology creates in a person. How does
Scientology control its members? Why do Scientologists find it so hard
to leave? Psychologically and spiritually battered, they persist in
their bewildering allegiance to their founder and the organization. Why
would that be? These effects are laid in at every level of Scientology.
They are laid in deliberately and with malice aforethought. This essay is about how Scientology hacks
your soul.
The reader may be
relieved to learn that I am not a nuclear physicist 1,
mathematician2, war hero3, engineer4
or “Doctor of Divinity”5 (all claimed by
Hubbard). I am not advocating
psychotherapy; nor have I
received psychotherapeutic advice or treatment following my
departure from Scientology. This essay and my opinions are based upon
my experiences relating to Scientology, and come from my attempt to
understand the trauma I experience and observe in others. Even after
leaving Scientology, it was extremely difficult to overcome my aversion
to reading psychology material. And yet that is where my research led.
In 1950, Hubbard ® knew of an unconscious mental phenomenon
that ties
the patient to the practitioner. He wrote about it in Dianetics ® The Modern Science of
Mental Health6:
The
phenomenon of “transference,” where the patient simply transfers his
griefs to the practitioner, is not the mechanism here at work;
transference is a different thing, bred of a thirst for attention and a
feeling of needed support in the world. Transference can be expected to keep up
forever if permitted; <emphasis added> the patient of a
doctor, for instance, may go on and on having illnesses just to keep
the doctor around. Transference may
occur in Dianetic therapy, the patient may lean on the auditor solidly, beg the auditor for advice, appear
to hold out engrams in an effort to keep the auditor working hard and
available and interested; all this is the result of a sympathy computation and is aberrated
conduct.7
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Hubbard
desired to capitalize on transference <emphasis
added>. He stated in a lecture given on 12
June 1950, called The Conduct of an Auditor—Part 18:
And he [the
person undergoing Dianetics counseling] can be made to lean upon the auditor heavier and heavier
until a condition of dependence is created." <emphasis added>
Unfortunately
<emphasis added> the condition of dependence, no matter what you
do, is not going to stay created very long in Dianetics. What they call
“transference” and so forth in psychoanalysis you’ll find in Dianetics.9
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Every
human being is susceptible to transference. It is emphatically
not the sole domain of the psychotic or mentally unstable. What is not
normal is the intentional manipulation of transference phenomena to
profit and enslave.
Transference in
Psychology
Obviously, Scientology did not
originate the transference idea. This psychic phenomenon was
well known by Freud, Jung and other psychiatrists and psychologists.
They did and still do consider transference to be a very important
subject, something which requires the utmost care and attention in
therapy.
The enormous importance that Freud attached to the
transference phenomenon became clear to me at our first personal
meeting in 1907. After a conversation lasting many hours, there came a
pause. Suddenly he asked me out of the blue, “And what do you think
about the transference?” I replied with the deepest conviction that it
was the alpha and omega of the analytical method, whereupon he said,
“Then you have grasped the main thing."10
— Carl G.
Jung
In Freudian analysis, the patient’s underlying complex, previously
associated with someone in the patient’s life transfers to the analyst.
When that occurs, it is addressed in psychoanalysis to resolve the
complex.
Transference does not only
occur in therapy. This naturally
occurring phenomenon can easily be found in life, although very often it is not understood. An
extreme example would be that of a battered wife, compelled to return
home to her husband. Even if the woman were told that her husband would
harm her again if she returned to him, she would have no defense
against that unconscious content, unless the transference issue was
properly addressed. Careful analysis would reveal that there is
unconscious psychic content that associates the husband—not as a wife
beater, but as someone with whom she
cannot live without.
A newborn child depends utterly upon his mother for his survival and
care. She takes care of him and nurtures him—a completely natural and
desired condition. Ideally, the child grows up and matures into an
independent young man, fully ready to take care of himself and a family
of his own. Unfortunately, this does not always occur. Perhaps the
mother is domineering, or for some reason cannot let go of her child.
The young man, who should have gained his independence at a reasonable
age, is still attached to his mother. An emotionally charged,
unconscious factor, called a complex, will continue to associate
“mother” with “nurturing and care”. The young man eventually does leave
home and marries a young woman. Everything is fine, until one day the
new husband has an incident that seems to require his mother’s
nurturing. She is not around; his wife is the closest thing to
“mother”. The complex, which was previously associated with the mother
now transfers, to the wife. He unconsciously feels his wife should
perform the same nurturing role as his mother did. However, the wife
does not fulfill this role for the husband, and trouble ensues.
A Sea Org member stays in the Rehabilitation
Project Force (RPF), though he is treated more cruelly than any kidnapper
could treat his victim. He is deprived
of sleep, food, and the comfort of his family. He is thoroughly
introverted into believing some Authority, who has convicted him of evils so deeply entrenched
that he cannot be trusted with his liberty. He “knows” that this
Authority, whom he trusts with his very eternity, will cure him, and
that he must disclose his private
criticisms that point to the evils
that must be ripped out of his being. And so day after day he
cleans the dumpsters, he submits to endless interrogations, and he runs
around a pole to cure himself of those nameless
evils.
Then one day he escapes, still “knowing” that it is the evil within is telling him to run.
He makes his escape anyway. He somehow finds a way to start a new life,
though he is depressed and lonely and feels degraded. He eventually
finds the courage to talk about the atrocities he experienced. He goes
to the courts. And he sees the disbelief in the jury’s eyes: even if he
was telling the truth about the RPF,
why in God’s name did he submit to it in the first place? But he doesn’t know. He can only
point to the atrocities. The jury is fed at every turn with lies about
the Sea Org member’s past, and lies about their own crimes. Scientology
points to their happy membership and twists the minds of the jury with convolutions that would make any sane man’s
head spin. Scientology’s
defense depends utterly upon continuing to hide their secret weapon.
That weapon is transference.
Hubbard knew about transference from the very beginning. He used it
with full knowledge and with a diabolical
malevolence that only God can forgive. Transference itself has been carefully
hidden from every Scientologist, so he would never know. And Scientology uses it relentlessly on every
enemy that could possibly find them out. I am reminded of an
affirmation made by Hubbard:
You use the minds of men. They do
not use your mind or affect it in any way. You have a sacred spiritual
mind, too strong, too sacred to be touched. Your league with Higher
Beings, your mighty Guardian and the All Powerful, renders you beyond all criticism.11
All men
shall be my slaves! All women shall succumb to my charms! All mankind
shall grovel at my feet and not know why! 12
— L. Ron
Hubbard
The terrible thing is that transference
in Scientology has been hidden in broad daylight. Every Scientologist reads it. And passes it
by. That too is explained by
transference and will be covered in this essay. But once you can
see it for what it is, there will be no question about how Hubbard
enslaved you, about how he built his empire, and about how Scientology continues to exist,
despite the atrocities and because of the atrocities that they inflict
on every soul they touch.
Scientology and Psychology
In 1952 Hubbard acknowledged Scientology’s indebtedness to the work of
Sigmund Freud. His alleged tutoring in Freudian analysis came to him
via afternoon conversations with a Commander Thompson in 1924, when
Hubbard was all of thirteen years old.13
In June 1959, Hubbard credited psychology as developed by Wundt,
psychoanalysis (Freud) and psychiatry as developed in the 19th century
in Russia as those bodies of work that “provided data which permitted
Scientology to begin”.14 This cleverly worded 1959
acknowledgement of Pavlov15 leads immediately to the
question: Why were dog experiments useful in the formation of
Scientology?
There is documented evidence throughout the materials of Scientology
that Hubbard quickly came to view psychiatry and psychology as the
ultimate enemy of mankind.16 I am certainly not condoning
psychiatric abuse, but doesn’t it seem odd that the very things
psychiatry is accused of in Scientology are being perpetrated on a
daily basis by Scientology? Why would Hubbard have considered himself
exempt from his own pronouncements given in The Criminal Mind?17
Scientology continues to perpetrate psychological crime in the
ill-begotten name of religion. Is there anyone in Scientology who
really knows about this evil? If so, how can they continue to
perpetrate these crimes for profit or for whatever contagion they hold
dearer than life?
Scientology and
Transference Abuse
Unlike Scientology, certified psychotherapists are instructed to
educate their patients on transference. Depending on the type of
therapy, the patient and therapist consciously use the mechanism of
transference to resolve the patient’s difficulties. Both therapist and
patient are aware of the various patterns of transference. The
following patterns represent a few ways in which transference can be
identified in psychotherapy:
* Patient sees therapist
as a nurturing mother
* Patient is afraid the therapist is judgmental of her or doesn’t like
her
* Patient has an avoidance of personal/emotional relationship or is in
denial of it
* Patient pretends that everything the therapist does works
* Patient experiences the therapist as pressuring him to perform.
Consciously wants to please the therapist, but fails to do therapy
correctly, or if she does, fails to progress in life or denies progress.
* Patient complains to therapist about his misery in unconscious
attempt to get therapist to do it for him.
* Patient tries to take care of therapist. Picks up on clues of
therapist’s pain or life struggles and engages therapist in talking
about them. Notices therapist’s insecurities and assuages them.
* Patient suspects that the therapist harbors negative feelings toward
him that are hidden or that the therapist will at some point turn on
him or abandon him.
* Constantly blames himself for poor performance in therapy and life.
* Expects therapist to appreciate or admire him.18
The patient develops new relationship
issues by reason of entering into therapy. The therapist instructs the
patient regarding the specific use of transference in therapy.19
(Referenced URL gives an account of a patient’s perspective.)
Psychologists are enjoined under their ethics code so as to not abuse
the phenomenon of transference to further their own ends. The following
few excerpts are taken from the American Psychological Association’s ETHICAL PRINCIPLES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS AND
CODE OF CONDUCT:
1.15 Misuse
of Psychologists' Influence.
Because psychologists' scientific and
professional judgments and actions may affect the lives of others, they
are alert to and guard against personal, financial, social,
organizational, or political factors that might lead to misuse of their
influence.
1.19 Exploitative Relationships.
Psychologists do not exploit persons over
whom they have supervisory, evaluative, or other authority such as
students, supervisees, employees, research participants, and clients or
patients.
3.05 Testimonials.
Psychologists do not solicit testimonials
from current psychotherapy clients or patients or other persons who
because of their particular circumstances are vulnerable to undue
influence.
3.06 In-Person Solicitation.
Psychologists do not engage, directly or
through agents, in uninvited in-person solicitation of business from
actual or potential psychotherapy patients or clients or other persons
who because of their particular circumstances are vulnerable to undue
influence. However, this does not preclude attempting to implement
appropriate collateral contacts with significant others for the purpose
of benefiting an already engaged therapy patient.20
— American
Psychological Association
The entire APA’s code will inform the
reader as to standards of professional conduct, which can be compared
against Scientology’s conduct in corresponding matters. The above
represents only a few such points.21
Scientology does not inform their members of the unconscious hold they
have on them. They do everything in their power to create in their
members’ minds a complete dependence upon Scientology for answers to
every aspect of their lives. And they do this while misrepresenting to
the new Scientologist: that with each course and with each auditing
session, he is becoming more independent and more “himself.”
Scientology uses their religious façade to avoid legal issues
relating to transference abuse. In every single technical,
administrative, and ethics training course Hubbard teaches specialized
applications of control that exactly match the transference. Every
staff member has been trained to control the public using these
specialized functions of his post. Every staff member is taught that he
is doing the very best for the new person, and that by simply doing his
job as instructed, he is helping the person.
The Scientologist is trained within the context of Hubbard’s “superior”
control methods necessary to help his fellow and save him from the
reactive bank. He believes that Hubbard, through thirty-five years of
qualified scientific research knows better than he how to help
humanity. He may even believe that there is some divine reason for
Hubbard’s ability to plumb the depths of the mind.
The incontrovertible evidence presented in excellently documented works
shows that Hubbard was not qualified, as he had us believe.22
What he did manage to grasp before the release of Dianetics was the
theory of transference. He used that theory to formulate his “science”
and his “religion” as a control vehicle to enslave you. And he taught
it seamlessly throughout his written and spoken words.
The Scientology Symbol ®
The one thing that each and every Scientologist knows and operates with
in Scientology is the ARC triangle. It is the most basic of basic
fundamentals in Scientology. In any introductory lecture, the attendee
is told that understanding is composed of Affinity, Reality and
Communication. Sounds pretty good, and anyone can apply that, right?
Hubbard knew that the underlying common denominator for any complex was
in the affinity that the person has for another. He knew this from
studying the work of Wundt, one of the psychotherapists he credits with
the foundation of Scientology. Wundt found that empathy was the
coalescing factor in the process he termed as assimilation.23
The upper triangle is the KRC triangle, which represents Knowledge,
Responsibility and Control. This too makes sense on the surface. If you
know about something, can take responsibility for it and direct it
according to the knowledge you apply, you can causatively control that
factor of your life.
Hubbard knew from his studies of the complex and transference that the
more influence a person could exert against the patient, the stronger
would be the underlying unconscious bond. He knew with the right
“knowledge” he could control people. His “knowledge” was the subject of
transference; the mechanism of that knowledge is hidden from conscious
view.
Hubbard’s definition of responsibility includes:
When
agreement (reality) is established through communication, an
understanding bond is achieved between the two parties. This represents
the lower triangle in the Scientology symbol.6.
the area or sphere of influence the individual can rationally affect
around other people, life, MEST (Matter,
Energy, Space, Time), and the general environment.24
Hubbard’s brand of responsibility involved conferring on Scientologists
the authority to control everything and everyone in his environment:
THE POWER
(defined as light-year kilotons per microsecond) OF A THETAN IS
MEASURED BY NOTHING ELSE THAN THE DISTANCE (defined as spherical
spatial length) AROUND HIM IN HIS ENVIRONMENT THAT HE CAN CONTROL.
<sic>25
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Obviously, the
more “OT® ” Scientologists become, the greater control Hubbard
himself could exert into the environment via those Scientologists.
The degree that Scientology controls the environment depends upon the strength of the transference Hubbard
creates in its members.
The Scientology symbol represents the exact structure of the Bridge. It
is not the result of Hubbard’s discoveries of the human mind. Hubbard
constructed the Bridge to precisely mimic the development of the
complex and its transference. It is Hubbard’s symbol for the control
and enslavement of mankind.
The Scientology
Organization
Hubbard created Scientology as a literal extension of his own self. His
organization is a vertical hierarchy wherein command intention descends
and compliance ascends.26 Hubbard fully intended
Scientologists to administer their personal lives using the same
policies and militaristic principles
as those governing Scientology’s “church” organizations.
As an example, on the entry-level “Hubbard Life Orientation ®
Course” or “LOC”, the student learns about Hubbard’s “organizational
structure, called an “org board”. This org board is a structure that
facilitates the militaristic and hierarchal arrangement for every
Scientology organization. The LOC student fits the functions of his
personal life into the same template. He then applies Hubbard’s ethics
conditions and administrative policies to his personal “departments.”
Every Scientologist, from an administrative standpoint, is a satellite
Scientology organization.
He is simply a lower echelon of the “Church of Scientology”, whether or
not he is contracted as a staff member. Hubbard expects every
Scientologist to apply Hubbard’s ethics formulas and administrative
policy to his personal life, his family and his business.
Every Scientologist is strongly encouraged to become a “field staff
member” or FSM. He learns to use Hubbard’s dissemination techniques on
his friends and associates; the Scientology organization pays
commissions to the FSM for this.
Over the years our best
source of pcs [preclears] and students have been:
1. Books bought
2. Personal contact by field auditors.
On (1) no org that doesn’t sell books hard <sic> can long
survive. This is the front line and its neglect causes the later
finance troubles.
On (2) although it is fashionable sometimes for orgs to curse the field
and for the field to curse the org, the solid truth is that the second
source of org pcs and students has been the field auditor.
Therefore he must be a commission earning staff member and let go on as
before in the field. […]
If new students are taught also how to be a Field Staff Member and the
dissemination formula and its drills are taught you will have
enrollments galore just for that.27
— L. Ron
Hubbard
There is no question as to what constitutes
Hubbard’s “Command Intention.” It is contained in his policies, which
govern every organization and individual. Every Scientologist knows who
his Authority is and what compliance is expected for every aspect of
his life. There is also no question as to Hubbard’s “Command Intention”
for his empire:
I wonder if there is a
third dynamic triangle like the ARC Triangle that goes: [image of a
triangle that depicts “People”, “Service” and “Funds” at each corner.]
Maybe people are A, Service is R, and Funds is C. Sort of a solid ARC
triangle. Seems to work that when you drop out people you drop out
service you drop out funds. An org that dismisses staff to save money
drops service and winds up with a high debt. In an org when I manage
one directly, I always push up numbers of staff, push up service and
the money rolls in.
[…] So it isn’t just numbers of people that made up the A. “People”
probably needs a special definition. It may be “beings” or “productive
individuals” or people in affinity with each other. (OODs 6 Aug 70)
[OODS: “Orders of the Day”]28
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Hubbard’s administrative system manipulates
the transference to control every echelon, from the individual
Scientologist to the upper reaches of Scientology’s International
Management. The transference that is manipulated by Scientology’s
“spiritual technology” is not only facilitated in the individual
through administrative measures—the administrative measures themselves
intrinsically manipulate transference on a group level.
Scientology and the New
Scientologist
Anyone coming into Scientology enters with the idea that there is
something in his life that Scientology can help him resolve or make
better. Anyone without such hopes is summarily dismissed with a label
of PTS (Potential Trouble Source).29 In other words,
dismissal occurs when the Scientologist handler fails to activate a
complex. Hubbard’s policy clearly states:
DISSEM TO THE INDIVIDUAL
WITH PROBLEMS NOT THE GROUP OR INDIVIDUAL WHO HAVE SOLUTIONS.
<sic>30
— L. Ron
Hubbard
(There will be further discussion on PTS
phenomena a little later in this essay.)
Hubbard concluded that a non-Scientologist is very far from accepting
the concept that he “is” a thetan. He determined that the person on the
street must be addressed at his own level, that of “raw meat”. Hubbard
felt that the individual coming into Scientology was simply an
unconscious biological robot, thoroughly controlled by his reactive
mind.31 He masterminded The Dissemination Drill as a means
to get the “overwhelmed thetan” to conceive of some small thing about
his life that was ruining him. As “nothing in this life aberrates the
being”, the trained Scientologist “knows” this small thing is not
important; what is important is that the person admits to an unwanted
condition.32 The Scientologist then convinces the person
that this “ruin” is something Scientology can handle for him. The
Dissemination drill generates psychic tension between the subjective
“ruin” and the objective organization. When that occurs, money flows to
the coffers automatically and outside of the person’s own free will.
That “small thing”, the complex, is intentionally activated in the
person’s unconscious by the Dissemination Drill, and by any Scientology
training or auditing. It is not necessary for a dissemination drill to
be run on a person; the psychological basis for the drill is duplicated
throughout Scientology. The transference itself probably crystallizes
at the moment the individual begins to think of himself as a
Scientologist, or when he becomes convinced that Scientology will help
or has helped him.
By reason of his “raw meat” human condition, the new Scientologist is
considered to not be in control of his body, his environment or his
life. To be called a human is derogatory and an insult in Scientology.
It is not until he has attested to the state of Clear that he can
consider himself officially “Homo Novis”, or “new man”. 33
The new Scientologist is considered to be under the control of his
reactive mind and must not under any circumstance be allowed to control
himself or make his own judgments. The reasoning is that the reactive
mind will do everything possible to obstruct the pitifully overwhelmed
thetan from going free.
Hubbard categorically revokes any rights the person has to his own
privacy, and specifically revokes the right of any person to his own
thoughts.34 Unfortunately, this right is never returned to
the Scientologist; it is considered an index of the case’s progress
where he no longer has concern about what might be private. 35
Since the Scientologist entrusts the organization to help him address
the underlying causes of his difficulty, it would be both logical and
necessary that he would trust the organization with access to his
private thoughts. Conversely, any “secrecy aberration” is immediate
cause for suspicion of hidden crimes against Scientology.36
The Scientologist sacrifices his own constitutional right to privacy,
due to transference and the unconscious loyalty it imparts to Hubbard
and the organization. Scientology tricks the person into believing that
Scientology alone can help him; he has nowhere else to turn.
Scientology is a monopoly; Hubbard saw it as such as early as December
1952.
It’s all right in this
offhand age to just brush things aside and say, “Well, it’s of no
importance, no importance really; and let’s not be dramatic the way
people are being about the atom bomb.” Actually the atom bomb isn’t as
serious as this other. It’s just a MEST weapon. And, it’s all right to
be very offhand and very cheerful and so on, and like the little boy
whistling in the dark says no ghosts or bogymen exist—well, this
bogyman does exist.
It’s a very simple remedy. And that’s just make sure that the remedy is
passed along. That’s all. Don’t hoard it, and don’t hold it; and if you
ever do use Black Dianetics, use it on the guy who pulled Scientology
out of sight and made it so it wasn’t available. Because he’s the boy
who would be electing himself “the new order.” And we don’t need any
more new orders. All those orders as far as I’m concerned have been
filled. <sic>37
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Anyone who criticizes Scientology is
considered an enemy of Scientology.38 When a Scientologist
is the unwitting effect of transference, and when that transference
takes place across enough complexes, is it any wonder how the
Scientologist’s loyalty would be impervious against the actions and
reason of Scientology’s “enemies”?
Scientology and Ethics
[…] the whole purpose of
ethics [is] to get tech in.39
[…] The purpose of Ethics is
TO REMOVE COUNTER-INTENTIONS FROM THE ENVIRONMENT.
And having accomplished that the purpose becomes
TO REMOVE OTHER-INTENTIONEDNESS FROM THE ENVIRONMENT.
Thus progress can be made by all. <sic>40
— L. Ron
Hubbard
In these statements Hubbard plainly
expressed what he intended to do to “clear the planet”.
Hubbard labeled anyone not agreeing with him to be an enemy and a
criminal.41 In his extreme paranoia, Hubbard literally saw
the world outside of Scientology as an enemy, either potential or
actual. He used ethics as the membrane to separate that which he could
usurp and that which he could not. Anything that could be brought
within his control was “good”. Anything outside of his sphere of
control was “evil”. Hubbard did not intend to better man’s condition;
he sought rather to replace humanity with his own twisted ideal. He
used a specialized aspect of transference to do it with.
Negative transference is a known phenomenon in psychological texts.
Instead of the transference resulting in an affinity with or dependence
upon the object, negative transference results in an antipathy toward
the object. Hubbard and Scientology intentionally invoke and manipulate
a negative transference to viciously attack any person or organization
it considers to be an enemy. Whether that enemy is the concerned family
member of the Scientologist, the critic of Scientology, the American
Psychiatric Association, the FDA, or the IRS, there is no hand raised
against Scientology that does not feel the pain of its venomous bite.
The Potential Trouble
Source
When a Scientologist routes onto a course or onto auditing, he is
checked for any “PTS situation” such as family members who may not be
agreeable to his participation in Scientology. The person will be seen
to “roller coaster” and he will “lose his gains” in Scientology. The
reason given for this is that he is in the psychological grip of
someone who is counter-intending his spiritual enhancement in
Scientology. I have witnessed this situation many times as an auditor.
The person does appear to roller coaster in the presence of family
members who are not in complete agreement with Scientology. And I have
observed that the technology does not seem to “work” in the presence of
this condition.
However, what is at work here is an aberration of the transference
factor. Family members do often represent psychological difficulties,
referred to above in terms of complexes. But Scientology has already
disrupted the original psychological situation by reason of
transference. The Scientologist has switched his dependence on the
family member over to a dependence on Scientology. The Scientologist’s
allegiance wavers between the family and Scientology. The “roller
coaster” effect is an incomplete or unstable transference. It is now up
to the ethics officer to effectively complete the Scientologist’s
incomplete allegiance.
The ethics officer’s first concern is to head off any attacks by those
critical of Scientology.42 The Scientologist poses a problem
for the ethics officer and to the organization by reason of his
connection to a potential enemy. The solution to all this is a matter
of Scientology policy: Handle or disconnect. The ethics officer must
reinforce the Scientology transference. To accomplish this he coaches
the person to say and do things to the family member to bring him to
“cause”. Hubbard technology is used to placate the family member, and
to get the Scientologist to deactivate the family member’s own
complexes.
What occurred here, in the mind of the Scientologist, is that his
transference has stabilized in Scientology. If the Scientologist cannot
deactivate the family member’s complex, he must disconnect from that
family member. He cannot receive training or auditing until the
disconnection is accomplished. Scientology extorts cooperation of the
“PTS” Scientologist through the threat of his spiritual freedom. In
other words, Scientology manipulates the Scientologist’s transference.
This obviously ensures for the organization that it is not being
infiltrated with family members who are concerned with their children
or relatives; this is the ethics officer’s first priority. Secondly, in
the event of a “successful” handling with the family member, the
non-member is not usually aware that he is being manipulated by
Scientology via his own child. If the family member has complexes
connected with the Scientologist, any projections upon the child must
be withdrawn, at least to the degree that the Scientologist can proceed
without interference. In this way also, any natural protective
mechanisms the parent may have for his family member are rendered
ineffective. That the Scientologist’s natural affinity and respect for
his family has been eroded or destroyed is in itself of no concern to
Scientology. Family matters are very “human” in nature.
In addition to the type of PTS described above, Hubbard devised several
categories of “PTS” to encompass a wide variety of transference
anomalies. In all cases, the Scientologist is made to read a list of
characteristics that any human being could be found to manifest, either
negatively or positively.43 The Scientologist, already in
the grip of a stressful transference situation, sits in front of an
ethics officer and is made to judge that other potential enemy against
this list of “suppressive characteristics”. What is he going to decide?
Is that other person actually an enemy? If the Scientologist can’t make
up his mind, the ethics officer will label the Scientologist any number
of sub-categories of PTS; the list includes: PTSness arising out of the
person’s own degraded state, and PTSness due to the Scientologist’s own
“hidden evil intentions.” What would you decide?
Once an unstable transference has been established and labeled as a PTS
situation, there are no holds barred against this imagined danger to
the organization. Scientology employs aggressively coercive methods to
stabilize the Scientologist’s allegiance.
Conditions Formulas
Scientology ethics formulas can easily be seen as steps to manipulate
transference and allegiance. As one example, the Liability formula
states that the person has taken on the color of the enemy. 44
Completion of the formula requires that one:
1. Decide who are one’s
friends.
2. Deliver an effective blow to the enemies of the group one has been
pretending to be part of despite personal danger.
3. Make up the damage one has done by personal contribution far beyond
the ordinary demands of a group member.
4. Apply for reentry to the group by asking the permission of each
member to rejoin and rejoining only by majority permission, and if
refused, repeating (2) and (3) and (4) until one is allowed to be a
group member again.45
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Here we can see that:
1. The Scientologist must first identify the correct object of the
transference.
2. He must employ negative transference to harm the other side. The
personal danger is a necessary component; it uses the person’s own fear
to accomplish negative transference.
3. In making up the damage beyond the ordinary demands of a group
member, he is simply controlled in a Pavlovian way to teach him that
disloyalty carries punishment.
4. The last step accomplishes a couple of things. First, the
Scientologist doing the conditions is coercively made to disclose his
“crimes”, that he is being judged by his peers-as-gods. Secondly, the
person’s formula write-up reinforces to the group what constitutes
improper transference and what actions will result in punishment.
The Scientologist believes that he is doing the ethics formulas on his
own determinism. This is simply not the case. A person only passes on
ethics when the conclusions he reaches meet with the approval of the
ethics officer and are in close alignment with Scientology’s mores.
Ethics System
The Scientology ethics reporting system serves to maintain the
integrity of the transference to Hubbard and his organization. By
strenuously enforced policy, Scientologists are required to report to
ethics any infractions or policy violations by their fellow members,
their families and their marriage partners. 46 The
Scientology report system reinforces the idea that the only appropriate
transference is to the organization. Any allegiances to members,
family, etc., can be cancelled, no matter who the offending party is.
The Scientologist “learns” that his only safety is through a completely
transparent and blind trust of those in control and that the only valid
receiver of his trust is the hierarchy of the organization itself.
Failure to report an “ethics” situation to Ethics is not viewed
lightly, and for “good reason.”47
Hubbard had a real taste of the power and ramifications of transference
in 1964:
Washington D.C. either
did not know or did not follow the explicit policy concerning receiving
favors from preclears but only half-heartedly reported them to an
uninformed HCO which didn’t know or didn’t follow the full intent and
spirit of the policy and never told me as was implied in the original
policy letter. The wife of that person giving the favors brought on the
whole <sic> FDA mess that cost us tens of thousands of dollars
and two years <sic> of grief and almost knocked out Scientology
in the U.S.48
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Overts and
Withholds: O/W Write-ups
There are specific and complex technical issues on the overall subject
of confession as it relates to transference. Generally speaking,
however, when a person writes up his sins (called overts and withholds,
or O/Ws), he examines his transgressions against the benchmark of
Scientology moral codes. For example, a person would not have sinned if
he infiltrated the IRS, despite current PR to the contrary. However, if
he had a critical suspicion of Hubbard’s personal involvement in that
infiltration, he would have underlying sins against Hubbard. The O/W
write-up reinforces what the person must or must not transfer his
allegiance to; by exposing the objects of his own negative
transferences to a judgmental ethics officer, he “sets himself
straight” regarding his positive allegiance to Scientology. Confessing
one’s sins never resolves the transference itself. It “relieves”
negative transference that Scientology does not want him to have.
Scientology distorts and erodes the traditional religious practice of
confession. Throughout religious history, mankind turns to God for
forgiveness of his sins, and reinforces his allegiance to his Creator.
In the Scientology confessional however, God’s job is given to the
auditor, who forgives the person “on behalf of Scientologists”.49
Scientology Justice
None.
Hubbard Redefines
Transference
Hubbard was completely aware of transference and its specific and
far-reaching effects in 1950. He built his whole moneymaking operation
around transference. And then suddenly, in 1956, with a undeniably
intentional twist of his pen, redefined transference and took the
subject underground. He did not resolve transference; he simply found a
more profitable way to control humanity by corrupting its meaning.
We find another error in
psychoanalysis under the heading of “transference.” The actual
definition of “transference” in psychoanalysis is sufficiently unstable
to bring about considerable argument as to what is meant by
transference. In fact, in Dianetics, we had to reestablish an entirely
different condition which we called “valences” to denote the shift from
one’s own personality into that of another.
Transference in psychoanalysis was used to denote the transference of
the patient into the valence of the practitioner. This was the way
which Commander Thompson described the phenomenon to me and nothing has
been learnt <sic> from later analysts to disprove this basic
definition of Freud’s.50
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Hubbard curiously credited his childhood
tutoring experience with Commander Joseph “Snake” Thompson, as the
basis for this definition. Within the same time period, he was making
plans for a Scientology doctorate course to include a “fast review of
Freudian psychoanalysis to the end of obtaining a fast and certain
command of diagnosis and definition as outlined by Sigmund Freud.”51
We also know that he was watching Freud and his book sales very
closely, and we know of Hubbard’s clear intention to monopolize
psychotherapy.52 By July 1953, he was busy “writing up a
book on the subject of Freudian self-analysis.”53 And within
a month, the book Self-Analysis54 was revised reissued and
included as part of standard procedure in processing.55
Hubbard completely redefined transference as the patient taking on the
identity of the practitioner. This was not a one-time error; Hubbard
repeated his new definition for transference in the Saint Hill ®
Special Briefing Course Lecture numbered SH Spec 6507C27 56,
as well as in Certainty Vol. 9 No. 7.57 Hubbard hid his
crime in broad daylight; to this day, glossaries in tape transcripts
and newer versions of basic books provide the correct definition of
transference. Hubbard knew he could not resolve the subject of
transference—his entire empire was built around it!
In every Scientologist he maliciously created a monumental negative
transference against psychotherapy and psychoanalysis so that they
would never turn to a psychiatric text for any authority on the human
mind. And his research continued in the direction of how to abuse
transference by obscuring its effects. I will point out a couple of
technical examples of this a little later.
Transference vs. Valence
Very briefly, in transference, one is dealing with a relationship
issue. If one addresses valence, however, one is not dealing with a
relationship—he is dealing with a psychological identity. Treating a
valence does nothing to address the transference. As an example, say
the person has a “mother” complex. The psychoanalyst would not address
the identity of the patient-as-mother. The patient isn’t being mother!
The patient’s identity is a completely wrong target. To address the
individual’s identity directly would introvert him totally and bury the
complex even further.
It gets much worse. Not only did Hubbard manage to bury the complex and
obscure the transference, he developed technology that would literally
replace the person’s identity, while making him feel completely
extroverted. I will discuss some examples of this under later headings.
Lower Bridge
One can easily see that the lower Bridge comprises copious permutations
of Freudian-based free association exercises. Within the context of
proper therapy, they would probably be relatively innocuous. Hubbard
used the psychoanalytic techniques of free association to make the
Scientologist feel that he was getting somewhere. He justified this
under the heading of “getting charge off the case”. People do
experience temporary releases and relief at the lower levels. This is
not because of Scientology; it is because of “squirrel” psychotherapy
called Scientology.
It is even conceivable that some Scientologists may experience some
accidental resolution of transference in various areas of their lives.
This would be permitted only if that resolution does not disturb the
Scientologist’s dependence on Scientology. As an example of this: a
person has a session and discovers he can now paint. (These things do
occur in auditing from time to time. As above, it is not Scientology—it
is what Scientology has stolen from psychology.) Now our painter
decides to quit his job and stop making his Bridge payments, or leave
his course so he can explore his new ability. Forget it! Unless his
contributions and time on course remains undisturbed, he would be
“out-ethics” by making these life changes. He is told gently or not so
gently by the ethics officer that he has “stopped to smell the roses”,
when what he really needs to do is pay for his next Scientology
service, and “go OT. “Positive effects” that the Scientologist
experiences along the way are important to the degree that they give
the Scientologist something to point to as “progress” up the Bridge.
There is, however, a dangerous aspect of Freudian analysis and free
association. Free association is known in psychoanalysis to activate
complexes. Every answer to a repetitive question in Scientology
auditing is contained within the complex that the question itself
evokes. By the specially trained-in impingement of the auditor upon the
person’s unconscious, and by the authority of the auditor, the complex
is activated. The preclear continues to find new answers to the same
question repeated by the auditor; the process is complete when the
preclear voices a new realization about the content of the complex, and
when a particular needle response is seen on the e-meter.
In Scientology, it is held that nothing in the person’s current life is
really aberrative; that the source of his troubles lays much further
back in time. The only “purpose” for addressing a case at lower levels
is to release enough attention and affect so that the Scientologist can
make contact with and address the things that Hubbard professed to lay
at the bottom of every being’s difficulty.58
Scientologists do not realize that with every session, despite whatever
else “positive” that happens, their unconscious allegiance to
Scientology gets strengthened. Every complex that is touched on in a
session has psychic energy connected with it. The auditing process
provides the conduit for that psychic energy to be redirected to a
Scientology complex.
Hubbard constructed the sequence of the Bridge to exactly mimic the
formulation of the complex and its transference. With the Freudian free
association processes, existing complexes are rearranged and the energy
contained in those complexes is utilized to create a growing complex
and transference to Hubbard and Scientology. Every auditing process is
constructed and ordered into a grade that accomplishes a phases of the
transference. The Bridge is the sequence of those grades.
The Scientologist thinks that he is there of his own will. He is not.
It is not possible to be operating under one’s own free will while
being manipulated by a massive, growing transference that grips every
facet of his life. Scientology points to the “releases” that their
brand of psychotherapy brings, and holds it up as the only thing that
is going on. Behind the scenes however, Scientology actually replaces
the identity of the person with Hubbard’s own version of who he “should
be”. The person thinks he is getting closer to his own basic
personality. He thinks differently about his life, and about his
purposes. He feels simpler. He feels “clearer”. He is not. He is
selling his soul, piece by piece, and he is replacing it with a
grotesque caricature, called Hubbard.
What happens when a person leaves Scientology or is excommunicated?
Very often he will feel a terrible loss, a terrible loneliness, guilt,
or depression. Scientologists would look at this and say he feels that
way because he betrayed Scientology. No. Any bad psychological effect
from leaving Scientology is because of the unconscious transference
that Scientology worked so hard to build up. That transference is not
healed simply by the action of leaving Scientology.
Some unconscious process in the apologetic may convert that
transference to a negative transference against Scientology. And that
is the point where Scientology employs their “Fair Game” policy against
the apologetic. If they cannot maintain a positive transference and
control of a Scientologist, Scientology will label him a “suppressive
person”, and do everything in their power to destroy their new enemy.
They will use the apologetic’s own prior confessions from his auditing.
They will lie in court and they will use their transference technology
on judges, on political figures and on IRS agents; they will use it on
anyone they must manipulate to further their own ends. They will do
everything that an insane criminal would do. Their secret transference
weapons are specialized according to the function of the job for which
the Scientologist gets trained. And they are particularly vicious in
the arena of their external intelligence operations.
Scientology uses the lower Bridge to strengthen transference, to extort
money and to ensure that the person remains trapped for as long as he
has money to pay. This is so true that the Scientologist’s friends will
start to disassociate with the person if he has been off the Bridge for
too long. The peer pressure is subtle, but it carries tremendous power.
The penniless Scientologist has not lost his transference to
Scientology. He will go to any lengths to get back on the Bridge so he
can regain his status with Scientology. It is the power of the
unconscious transference that is at work, not some superhuman OT
phenomenon that keeps a person on the Bridge.
Certain psychic phenomena occur in Scientology auditing, which the
preclear would have no way of interpreting, except as contained in
Scientology “scriptures”. For example, preclears quite often make
contact with images of famous personalities and deities and believe
that they are addressing their own personal experience as those
identities. The auditor has been trained to view such contact as a
manifestation of a delusory case condition; it is viewed that the
preclear was overwhelmed in that time by the identity he now considers
himself to be. He is further admonished to take the preclear through
the incident as it is perceived by the preclear.59
Any auditor will eventually run across any number of archaic
celebrities in the mind of his preclear: Buddhas, Jesus Christs,
Napoleons, etc.
This is not to be construed as any effort to make less of the
individual being audited, or of the psychic reality of such images.
However, it is my strong opinion that the automatic interpretation the
preclear is expected to make is not properly construed, taught or acted
upon in Scientology. Further, the identification with such images can
have tremendously disastrous psychological effects in the person’s
concept of himself and of his relationship to his life. The person’s
own religious ideas are manipulated, using psychological measures of a
very sinister and dangerous nature.
Endless End of Endless
Interiorization Rundowns
Hubbard continued his “research” in the 1950’s, on the basis of his
convoluted identification of transference with valences. He theorized
in History of Man about the underlying causes and factors relating to
transference, whereby the thetan “transfers” into the body, has
difficulty getting out of the body, and so on.60 Hubbard
reworked transference to include not only the valence, but also
“exteriorization” itself.
Very often the soul or “thetan” seems to leave the body during TRs or
other drills or auditing, with or without perception of having a
different vantage point. This is considered a milestone in one’s
spiritual development in Scientology—it is called “going exterior.” In
training, “exteriorization” is classified as a “major stable win.”
Hubbard’s opinion of this state is discussed at length throughout the
writings of Scientology. He felt that
[…] the thetan should
feel at least a little remote and detached as though he weren’t quite
present. This detachment will increase as auditing continues to the
great benefit of the intelligence and ability.61
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Euphoria, disorientation, changes in visual
perception of his environment, and a marked decrease in ability to
conduct simple body functions such as walking or talking often
accompany “exteriorization”. There is no question but that this would
be considered a profoundly spiritual experience, intimately and
inextricably connected with the Scientology drill or auditing process
that precipitated it.
While I do have opinions and theories regarding the phenomena of
“exteriorization” itself, it is not my focus here to emphatically
assert scientific facts or theological conclusions. It is my opinion
based on many, many instances of observing this phenomenon in myself
and in those I personally audited in Scientology, that exteriorization
was perceived as an actual psychic occurrence, and that the associated
phenomena and change of view with respect to identity went along with
it. I will state my conviction: spiritual freedom is very much more
elusive at the top of the Bridge than it is at the bottom.
Indeed, the ultimate freedom in Scientology for which the entire Bridge
was constructed was an effort to get the person into a position where
he would be stably operating outside of and independent of his body,
free from all the traps of a physical existence and also oriented and
in control of all the strange things that go on in the universe of
spirits. The advanced levels were perceived as those final secrets that
make the person an Operating Thetan, someone who can operate stably
exterior, at cause over matter, energy, space and time. The Bridge
itself has been revised and reworked several times since the beginning
of Scientology, all in favor of undercutting the steps to this
mysterious and elusive state. Of course, with every “undercut”, Hubbard
increased his bank account. And every undercut was an effort to build a
stronger and more complete allegiance to Hubbard and to Scientology.
Exteriorization at lower levels is temporary in all cases, lasting for
seconds, hours or sometimes days. The exterior condition generally ends
with complaints of severe headaches, bodily discomforts of various
kinds, efforts to leave physically, and environmental pressures. This
sometimes very uncomfortable situation is explained as being the result
of the person not having the benefit of the rest of the Bridge. The
liability of exteriorization is so common and serious in Scientology
that every canned correction list in auditing includes questions about
exteriorization and exact measures to deal with it.62 It is
more often the case than not that repeated “corrections” must be made
in auditing to relieve the person of the bad effects of this condition.
The title of this section is meant as a special tribute for repeat
offenders of exteriorization.
As stated earlier, the Scientologist already has been indoctrinated as
to Scientology’s premise that he is an immortal being, timeless and
deathless. When he exteriorizes, he is congratulated and sent to the
examiner to write his affirmation success story. It confirms his god
status and acts as an interpretation of the occurrence itself. The
Scientologist attributes his lofty state to the works of Scientology
and Hubbard; the transference is yet again confirmed and reinforced.
The Scientologist is indoctrinated that his big problem in life is his
body.63 The current given purpose of Dianetics is to
eliminate body-related case factors that cause him to lose power, or
keep him from recapturing his full potential as a thetan. Dianetics
however was not originally conceived as having anything to do with the
soul.
There are relentless efforts in Scientology to get the person to
disassociate from the body; these efforts can be observed in social
concourse, in ethics measures which denigrate any “undue” concern about
one’s physical condition, and in examples of gross negligence in
getting proper medical attention where necessary. (Witness Lisa
McPherson.) The body’s only valid purpose in auditing is something by
which the e-meter electrodes can be held while the thetan “goes free.”
Hubbard states that an aberrated person would think of himself as “body
plus thetan”, whereas the ideal would be “thetan only”.64
Every time a person “exteriorizes”, it enforces the idea that he is not
his body but a spiritual entity. What better way to justify sleep
deprivation, terrible living conditions for staff members, and the
Rehabilitation Project Force? “You cannot hurt a thetan.”
A thetan in Scientology is defined in various ways as ”nothingness”
with a quality of awareness that is not of this universe. The
Scientologist is led to believe that it is this elusive godlike quality
contained in the nothingness that he must strive for. Little does he
realize that Hubbard thought of him as a literal unit of nothingness.
Nothingness, not of some indescribable and unapproachable universe, but
a nothingness of this universe, of this planet and of this “religion.”
Transference in Training
You have only one stable
datum. IF IT ISN’T WORKING, IT IS BEING VARIED. <sic>65
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Training personnel, called course
supervisors operate under severe threat of ethics penalties. They are
held responsible for ensuring that every student perfectly duplicates
the materials in Hubbard’s courses. They are themselves rigorously
trained to deal with any situation in which the student does not agree
with or completely duplicate Hubbard. The inventory of tools used by
these personnel is extensive, beyond the scope of this brief essay. The
student very quickly learns that if he has a disagreement, he will find
no listening ear in his course supervisor. The supervisor’s entire
focus is to get him back to the Hubbard viewpoint. This is absolute.
The student is taught in his “student hat” materials how to rectify any
“disagreement defects” in his study process, despite being taught
within the study procedure that he must not accept any materials that
he himself does not find to be true. This latter admonishment simply
obscures the actual phenomenon in play: the student’s critical process
is eroded continuously by forcefully coercive measures by the
supervisor. Nothing is ever wrong with Hubbard’s material; it is always
the student who is defective. The supervisor is a representative of
Hubbard and acts as an authority figure on Hubbard’s behalf.
Transference is always deepened to the degree that the object of
transference exerts influence and control on the person.
If a student is to proceed with his course, he has no choice but to
shift his attention to examine how his internal thought processes are
defective, and to find some means by which to rectify his imperfect
understanding of Hubbard. Through an extensive repertoire of exacting
measures, the student begins to think with the words and concepts
Hubbard uses in his written and taped material. The student learns an
intricate study process with which to rationalize the contrary and
paradoxical teachings of Hubbard. He learns to identify with Hubbard’s
humor and attitudes, and he begins to edit out his own thinking
processes in life in favor of Hubbard’s hopelessly twisted “logic” and
“philosophy.”
Scientology materials deal with a very wide range of mental and
emotional issues, social issues, familial issues, world and cosmic
views. The rigors of study will constellate more and more complexes in
the student. Certain training routines (TRs) are part of every
technical and administrative course. TRs are done repeatedly; they get
the student to blank out of and bypass his own “mental machinery”. It
is doubtful whether TRs overcome the transference itself; I believe TRs
only repress the complexes more completely, and that the training
system forces the transference deeper into the unconscious.
That complexes are repressed does not mean that the energy contained
within them lies dormant. On the contrary, the energy will be
unconsciously projected outward into the person’s environment. Where
before the person may have known that his unwanted feelings were his
own, he begins to see those negative aspects as belonging to others in
his environment. The repression of complexes actually provides
motivation for the Scientologist: once his own complexes are repressed,
he will “see” the negative psychic phenomena in others around him, and
he will feel a stronger urge to fix those other people by using
Scientology on them.
The student learns that his disagreeable “machinery” is part of his
reactive mind, and that the only correct and permanent resolution is by
way of auditing. In the meantime, his learning process is directed
unremittingly with coercive force and time-tested policies to 100%
duplication of the materials. In short, the student learns like a
Pavlovian dog that his only focus is to duplicate the materials exactly.
With each course he takes, the student actually replaces his personal
thoughts, feelings, ideas and mental phenomena in favor of those
represented by Hubbard. In training, any random patterns are edited out
thoroughly—it is literally impossible to otherwise attest positively to
100% duplication. Any nagging questions and any criticisms that the
student may have are weeded out and eliminated.
Ironically, Hubbard’s own version of transference is also accomplished
here. In other words, the Scientologist through training comes to
identify himself with Hubbard. Given an ever-increasing constellation
of complexes, which are repressed coercively at every turn, and with
the force and rigors in duplicating the thoughts and philosophy of
Hubbard, the only perceived avenue of mental escape comes down to
thinking and being as though he was Hubbard. He is constantly and
repeatedly told that through Scientology he is becoming more himself.
He is told at every turn that he is “totally responsible for the
condition he is in”. He understands that his path to total freedom lies
entirely in his ability to follow the directions and in the footsteps
of Hubbard. The only way out of any dilemma is however through learning
exactly “What would LRH do?” When Hubbard said in KSW #1, (the first
policy studied on every course in Scientology) “We’d rather have you
dead than incapable”, the reader will get the idea of the coercive
force which is applied against any recalcitrant.
I want to emphasize that what happens to the student is not
intellectually conscious. It is laid in with exact training measures,
with coercion and with the energies of the person’s own unconscious.
Scientology hacks the soul. I can think of no better way to summarize
what occurs.
Training Routines (TRs)
Every Scientologist does TRs as an early step on the Bridge. He learns
about the thetan and about “present time”, etc., and then he starts his
drills. These TRs are repeated and refreshed throughout Scientology.
The TRs themselves appear to have been adapted from age-old meditation
techniques. OT TRO, TR 0 and TRO Bullbait are souped up versions of
“meditation without seed”, where the person concentrates on blanking
out all noise and distraction and arrives at a point where he is simply
“being there”, as determined by his coach and by his supervisor.
The precursor to these TRs was the 1953 process:
Take Ten Minutes of
Nothing. This technique means oh, so literally what it says. It isn’t
ten minutes of “relaxation”, or “relief” or “rest”. It isn’t ten
minutes of you, a body. It isn’t ten minutes of somatics. It means ten
minutes of no body, no engrams, no walls, no MEST universe, no sound,
no thought, really nothing. All one’s life he is trying to get, to
work, to be, to perceive SOMETHING. Now for ten minutes let us have
utterly NOTHING. The gettingness of something makes for a one-way flow.
Also the dwindling spiral. Also, the one thing the analytical mind
can’t be, it thinks, yet all it is nothing, is in MEST terms: nothing.
Mind you, fear of NOTHING is enough to make one’s stomach curl for
nothing is death itself. This is unlimited in running time. It always
improves a case in the long run if not instantly, as it often does. The
preclear discovers sooner or later he CAN be nothing, that he doesn’t
have to strive to be. What a relief! Lao-Tse was so right about
striving.66
— L. Ron
Hubbard
TRs 1 and 2 begin to fill in the blankness
that he has experienced with the earlier TRs; they can be considered as
programming templates, likened to installing a new operating system
onto a freshly formatted hard drive. The use of nonsense phrases from
Alice in Wonderland conditions the student auditor to be willing to
spout off and receive unusual or nonsensical communication in sessions
and in his life. TRs 3 and 4 expand upon this concept and further train
the student to interject limited computational skills that are in
accordance with and within the limits of Hubbard’s rules.
The Upper Indoc TRs are aggressive training measures that teach the
student to assert authoritative physical and mental control of another;
they are taught to use “intention without reservation” to effect
compliance in others.67
Purpose of these four
drills, TR 6, 7, 8 and 9, is to bring about in the student the
willingness and ability to handle and control other people’s bodies,
and to cheerfully confront another person while giving that person
commands. Also, to maintain a high level of control in any
circumstances.68
— L. Ron
Hubbard
The Upper Indocs are part of every
auditor-training program and are included in most administrative
training courses as well. Every executive and staff member in
Scientology uses the principles of these drills to obtain compliance in
their orders. These TRs justify, train and give license for “proper”
manhandling.
Some courses also include the use of mood drills where the student’s
mood is found to color the session.69 Hubbard found that
students are not in control of their emotions, that emotions are
“automatic.” The drills were conceived to edit out of the student those
chronic or fixed moods or emotions, so that exactly and only the
prescribed tone is applied to the preclear in session. It is taught
that “TRs are a matter of sound (emphasis added), not the way the
person feels.”70 By these communication skills, the student
relearns how to process both incoming and outgoing messages according
to Hubbard’s idea of what constitutes vanilla communication—without
additive flavor or random personality coloration.
A Scientologist is indoctrinated that the sources of man’s troubles are
repressed and lay way back in the past. He learns that the reactive
mind itself contains all moments of his tortured past and that only
Scientology and Dianetics auditing are capable of recovering these
reactive components. When a person is “out of present time”, he is said
to be acting irrationally, because of his reactive mind.
The Scientologist is taught that the thetan is not in the physical
universe, but that he manipulates his physical experience from a
perspective outside the dictates of time. The thetan’s difficulties in
operating in a time-based physical environment theoretically stem from
the aberrations contained in his reactive mind. TRs are given as drills
to accomplish a present time viewpoint, regardless of his progress in
his auditing. The student is taught to separate himself from his
past—to experience the present from a thetan’s viewpoint, in other
words, from a viewpoint superior to the physical. This supposedly
enables the Scientologist to study, to audit and to “truly relate” to
his fellow man in life.
One begins to see how the person’s critical thinking process is being
manipulated through TRs. The student is drilled out of his own
“inferior” frame of reference, the reactive mind. He will have only
Hubbard’s frame of reference with which to analyze Hubbard’s material;
he will have only Hubbard’s frame of reference with which to audit and
conduct himself in life!
As discussed earlier, Scientologists’ most basic and fundamental tool
in life is the ARC triangle. TRs bypass the Scientologists’ natural
affinity and replace it with a studied duplicate of Hubbard. The
reality being agreed upon is Hubbard’s reality. And this is
communicated with Hubbard’s model. TRs made it possible for Hubbard to
inject his “knowledge” that you are” nothingness”, and that you cannot
be trusted with your own mind. He taught you that as a godlike creature
you are “responsible” only when you were in his brand of “present
time”, and he taught you how to control yourself and others through the
TRs and the godlike condition they impart. Knowledge, responsibility
and control. Sound familiar?
The Tone Scale
At some point early on in the person’s training, he trains on the
technology and applications of Hubbard’s emotional tone scale. Like the
TRs, tone scale material is basic Scientology, and is taught and
applied thereafter throughout Scientology, at every technical,
administrative and organizational level.
The tone scale is a list of emotions arranged in what is given as a
descending order of positivity. Each emotion listed is given an
arbitrary number that represents the quantity of mental mass supposedly
activated at the moment the emotion is experienced. The abridged
version of the tone scale represents the scale of emotions a Dianetics
auditor would encounter in a “human being”: a degraded thetan who is
now being carted around by a body.71 The expanded tone scale
is used in Scientology to staticize the emotions of the thetan direct;
without a body the thetan is supposedly capable of a much wider range
of emotions.72
At the top of the expanded tone scale one finds “Serenity of Beingness”
at 40.0. “Body Death” lies at 0.0. At the bottom of the list, at –40.0,
lies “Total Failure”. The student is coached to dramatize each emotion
on this list, over and over; until his supervisor is satisfied he has
edited out any emotion that appears to be fixed or “inappropriate.”
The Hubbard Chart of Human Evaluation and Dianetic Processing that
accompanies the basic text on the subject includes forty-two category
headings which correspond to the list of emotions. Headings include
one’s medical condition, psychiatric condition, expected ethics range,
sexual behavior, truth level, and so on. The student uses this chart
extensively to evaluate his own and others’ psychological condition.
The student is taught that this chart is an exact plot for any human;
that for example a person who is covertly hostile would invariably and
without exception have corresponding characteristics such as:
[…] Psychotic Range:
Psychotic
Sexual Behavior:
Promiscuity, perversion, sadism, irregular practices
Method Used by Subject to Handle Others: Nullifies others to get them
to the level where they can be used. Devious and vicious means.
Hypnotism, gossip. Seeks hidden control.73
— L. Ron
Hubbard
The numerical designations of the emotions
represent the relative degree of mass a person would be exhibiting.
This underscores the idea that the more “massy” or “stuck to the
physical” the person is, the closer he is to the evil that Scientology
is designed to resolve.
The student is drilled to instantly plot anyone’s emotional tone. In
doing so, he makes a blanket judgment of any subject, as delineated by
the chart. With this “tool” under his belt, he knows who he can trust
or not trust, who will answer a letter promptly, and whose politics
would be Liberal or Fascistic, and so on. He learns by using this tool
that a subject who is disgusted by sex will also have severe sporadic
illnesses, and that the same subject will use responsibility to further
his own ends.
The tone scale and its corresponding chart is the template with which
the student observes and interacts with others in his environment; this
is the bible he uses to monitor his own emotions and social responses.
The tone scale is one of the most basic controlling tools used at all
levels, used by the Scientologist in every area of his life.
Qualified independent professionals have never ratified the writings of
Hubbard in general, and the tone scale and Chart of Attitudes in
specific. Keep in mind that by the time the lay Scientology student
begins to study the tone scale material, he has already likely been
psychologically affected in ways that would alter his critical
faculties and perceptions relative to the material.
Apart from the obvious ramifications this has on the Scientologist’s
relationship with his family and other associates, the tone scale also
works subjectively upon the Scientologist. The Scientologist is taught
the exact pattern and range of acceptable emotional range at any time.
He knows that if he exhibits an emotion below 2.0, “Antagonism”, his
reactive mind has taken over control, and that anything he does or says
at this tone level will be subject to scrutiny; other Scientologists
will see him as being neurotic or psychotic. He learns that if he feels
like crying, he is only exhibiting a hidden and disgusting effort to
solicit sympathy from those in his environment. He will further learn
that if he is feeling grief, nothing he thinks will have any validity
connected with it, and that practically the exact opposite will be the
truth. He is taught that he can and must create emotions at his own
“will”, that any negative emotions stem from that part of him which is
his ultimate enemy to him and to those around him—his reactive mind.74
He discovers that he must only associate socially with those who
conduct themselves within a certain emotional range, that at any time
anyone could drop below 2.0 and betray him, lie to him and otherwise be
unworthy of his association and trust. He even learns how to select his
business partner and his wife (or her husband) by carefully plotting
her on the tone scale.
But, above all else, he is taught that the only “safe” and appropriate
place where he can feel negative emotions will be in his auditing
sessions, and that only his auditor will be able to uncover for him
what underlying unconscious factor is making him so anti-social and
miserable. In short, he must repress his emotions and override his
natural responses in favor of those emotions deemed acceptable and
called for by Hubbard. The tone scale and its emotional manipulation
serves to completely bypass the way the Scientologist actually feels.
It closes the door and makes inaccessible to the Scientologist that
part of the person who knows he is really not a robot, someone who
cannot be trusted with feeling and experiencing on his own terms.
As discussed earlier, the energy from the repressed emotions is also
utilized by Scientology. The Scientologist’s projections of his own
repressed content onto incorrect outside sources externalizes his own
unconscious mind out into the environment. Hubbard knew about this
psychic phenomenon as well; it is contained in his "confessional
technology.” If Scientology ethics deems the person has incorrectly
projected his content, the Scientologist applies ethics formulas or
receives auditing that addresses the Scientologist’s own “similar
overts.” However, if the projection targets an approved enemy of
Scientology, the Scientologist is encouraged to act upon his
projection. An example of the latter would be the Scientologist
projecting negative content onto psychiatry—he would be encouraged to
contribute to Scientology’s own efforts against psychiatry.
The Scientologist desperately needs to be able to evaluate his
environment with his own responses. But he has, in becoming a
Scientologist, unwittingly sold and given over control of his soul to
the “Church” of Scientology and to L Ron Hubbard. He thinks that he is
his personality and that all else is invalid or on the negative side of
the scale. He is “extroverted” to the degree that his unconscious
content is repressed and projected out into the environment. He is no
longer able to grant validity to any input from anyone outside
Scientology except as through the artificial template personality that
his training has erected around him. He “knows” that he is superior to
a non-Scientologist, that non-members are to be pitied, they are to be
recruited, they are to be controlled, and if they are critical about
his “religion”, they must be excised from his life.
Auditing, Transference and
Counter Transference
Hubbard developed specific policies to circumvent anomalies in the
transference phenomena. He knew that when the preclear’s transference
went to the auditor, they would give their auditor gifts or do favors
for them:
[…] Cases which are far
down on the tone scale will, when they reach 1.0, quite commonly offer
the auditor presents and attempt to do things for him. A crude
description of this was once contained in the idea of transference.75
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Hubbard did not want preclears transferring
their affections to their auditors. Transference is only valuable if it
is directed to the organization or to Hubbard. He both profited by and
punished the transference phenomena by forcing the preclear to pay
preferential rates if he insisted on a specific auditor.
Hubbard was well aware of a phenomenon well known in psychology as
counter-transference, where the practitioner’s own unconscious mind
begins to experience emotional side effects by reason of the
therapeutic process.
The American Heritage Dictionary defines counter transference as:
The surfacing of a
[psychotherapist's] own repressed feelings through identification with
the emotions, experiences, or problems of a person undergoing treatment.
— AHD
Certain aspects of auditing seem to inhibit
counter transference in the auditing session. Firstly, the auditor by
reason of his TRs and other drilling is rigorously trained to simply
listen and compute. The attention required in a session of an auditor
toward the preclear and the e-meter do not allow for any thoughts to
enter in to the equation. It is a very mechanical and exacting
procedure, and one in which any mental wandering of the auditor would
be drilled out of him rather soon in his career.
The auditor abides by an auditor’s code, which extracts a promise that
prohibits him from sympathizing with the preclear. 76 In my
opinion, the sympathy Hubbard was talking about is a close relation to
Wundt’s empathy, discussed earlier in terms of a complex creating
factor.
The auditor is factually an extension of Hubbard; this is a psychic
fact for the auditor, as well as an objective fact—no coloration of the
session is permitted. By the time a professional auditor has worked out
all his “bugs”, nothing the preclear says or does in a session seems to
have any effect on the auditor. If a counselor is to accomplish
anything at all in therapy, there must be some soul, some human
interface. Scientology applied to the letter of the word does not
permit that interface. All is distilled down to the vanilla rendition
of Hubbard’s own ideals. In that sense, the auditor’s soul seems
nowhere to be found; the only thing present is his auditing procedure
and an excellent sounding TR rendition of the auditing command. If and
when counter transference occurs, it occurs on a level deeper in the
unconscious than I can honestly assert or deny.
In the event of auditing failures, such as the preclear becoming ill
after session, poor emotional tone between sessions, etc., the auditor
would definitely take the heat for any bad effects created. This too is
covered in policy. There is absolutely no room for any criticism of
Hubbard’s technology or its results—only failures in application. And
of course, the auditor’s only recourse and solution would lie in the
direction of ever more closely duplicating Hubbard’s own intention and
beingness.
Within the organization, the auditor is revered above all other
personnel—this is the edict and position of Hubbard. Signs and
promotional pieces abound: “Auditors are the most valuable beings on
the planet.” As one can imagine, the degree of ego-inflation can be
extreme, no matter how intense and deeply seated the original intention
of the auditor is to help others. It seems that this very desire to
help is most insidiously taken over and corrupted by Scientology.
Auditors represent the most lucrative source of income for Scientology,
and that fact is obscene beyond words.
The E-Meter ®
Hubbard held up his e-meter phenomenon as proof of his theories
regarding the unconscious. Just because something has read on the meter
and the preclear associates it with a particular phenomenon does not
constitute evidence. The preclear is pre-indoctrinated to some degree
in Hubbard’s own theories, and he would interpret any psychic
experience from within the parameters of his indoctrination.
Hubbard developed the e-meter as an effort to resolve counter
transference. In Technique 8877 he states:
The best auditing and
the fastest by far is done with the E-meter. The meter practically runs
the case. And, most important, it spares the auditor too close a
concentration on the preclear, the only aberrative thing about auditing.78
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Hubbard inaugurated the e-meter as an
auditing tool prior to developing the TRs. Apparently the lie detector
didn’t work by itself. Make no mistake—along with Freudian free
association techniques, the e-meter’s purpose was to solicit complete
honesty and complete obedience in the preclear.79
Why Scientology Calls
Itself a Religion
Transference is sometimes viewed not as a negative thing, but as
completely positive. The Pope in the Roman Catholic Church would be an
example of this. As the servant of servants, he acts as the ultimate
mediator between the parishioner and God; transference is carried to
God via the Pope.
Hubbard capitalized on the phenomenon of the positive transference
found in any religion; he turned it into a black version for his own
self-aggrandizement. He knew that religion by its very nature would is
the perfect breeding ground for the manipulation of transference; God
cannot be scientifically proven, nor can a belief system be explained
in a logical way. Scientology hides behind a pseudo-religious
façade. That façade is a grotesque and hideous expression
of Hubbard’s own criminal insanity and of his own psychotic
identification with the image of God.
In 1956, Hubbard stated:
THE EIGHTH DYNAMIC—is
the urge toward existence as infinity. This is also identified as the
Supreme Being. It is carefully observed here that the science
<sic> of Scientology does not intrude into the dynamic of the
Supreme Being.80
— L. Ron
Hubbard
However, in the 1998 version of
Introduction to Scientology Ethics, the definition is given as follows:
The EIGHTH DYNAMIC is
the urge toward existence as INFINITY. The eighth dynamic is commonly
supposed to be a Supreme Being or Creator. It is correctly defined as
infinity. It actually embraces the allness of all.81
— L. Ron
Hubbard (Library)
God is being written out of the picture
these days. The current powers-that-be are vigorously sanitizing
Hubbard’s own words in written and taped material. Later versions of
Scientology material only serve to further obfuscate the criminal
intentions of its Hubbard. But by his own policies they may not be
cancelled; they must be used to expose the fundamental basis for
Scientology.
In fine print at the front of Introduction to Scientology Ethics82:
This book is part of the
works of L. Ron Hubbard, who developed Scientology® applied
religious philosophy and Dianetics ® spiritual healing technology.
It is presented to the reader as a record of observations and research
into the nature of the human mind and spirit, and not as a statement of
claims made by the author. The benefits and goals of Dianetics and
Scientology can be attained only by the dedicated efforts of the reader.83
— L. Ron
Hubbard (Library)
Dianetics spiritual healing technology
distinctly implies a religious doctrine. Yet, on close inspection of
the current official website of Scientology, one can find this quote:
Dianetics is actually a
family of sciences. It is here addressed in the form of a science of
thought applicable to psychosomatic ills and individual aberrations.
The field of thought may be divided into two areas which have been
classified as the “knowable” and the “unknowable.” We are here
concerned only with the “knowable.” In the “unknowable” we place that
data which we do not need to know in order to solve the problem of
improving or curing of aberrations of the human mind. By thus splitting
the broad field of thought, we need not now concern ourselves with such
indefinites as spiritualism, deism, telepathy, clairvoyance or, for
instance, the human soul.84
—
http://www.ronthephilosopher.org/page20.htm
How can a “Church of Scientology”, sell and
deliver a “spiritual healing technology”, a science that reports to not
concern itself with the human soul? How dare they try to hide the
blatant claims of its author and shift the responsibility for its
effects to the “dedicated efforts of the reader?” They dare, because
they know without question that it is the dedicated efforts of the
reader that activate his complexes and ensure transference; when that
is accomplished, the reader will buy more Scientology.
The American Heritage Dictionary defines religion as:
a. Belief in and
reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and
governor of the universe.
b. A personal or institutionalized system grounded in such belief or
worship.
— AHD
In Scientology, one gradually comes to
learn that instead of developing a relationship with one’s Creator,
Hubbard promises to return the Scientologist to his inherently native
state as a god. Scientology postulates that the basic life force of an
individual has gone through a devolutionary process through endless
trillenia of mishaps; that when he arrives in Scientology he is
degraded to the point where he is mistakenly identifying himself as a
human being, stuck in a body. By way of addressing and eradicating the
experiences contained in his reactive mind, the Scientologist
supposedly is returned to his original condition. Upon attest to the
state of Clear, he believes that he has arrived at his basic
personality. When he completes the more advanced levels, he attests to
being a smarter god.85
If a Scientologist trains to become an auditor, he earns the
distinction not only of being a god himself, but he is now a maker of
gods.
You got a human being
made into a new kind of human being. It’s a body being monitored by a
trap-proof thetan, and that makes quite a guy. Quite a guy. There’s a
big difference between that guy and Homo sapiens. An enormous guy. This
goal is so far beyond the goals of the first book that I don’t think
you could measure them with light-wave meters—light-year meters. It’s
just be—way beyond anything, because the bird’s immortal. Maybe you
haven’t probably, many of you, taken even that into consideration, that
you’ve just made a god. What is the definition of a god? It’s an
immortal. Since time immemorial in this language, the gods are
immortals. The immortals are gods. This guy can be—body can be bashed
in, so forth; all he’s got to do is pick up another one—knowingly, full
knowingly. <sic>86
— L. Ron
Hubbard
These facts are not presented to a new
Scientologist. It utterly eludes me how one could preserve his own
religious faith and still be a Scientologist. And yet that is what is
promised in Scientology.87
It is obvious that this early theme in Scientology extends throughout
its “scriptures”. When one enters Scientology he learns that he is a
thetan. Hubbard combines the concepts of “soul” and “spirit” and
teaches the student that the person who looks in the mirror in the
morning is the thetan and that he is immortal. He specifically states
that the thetan is the personality of the person that transcends death.
In Scientology, the personality of the Scientologist is the thetan,
right here and right now. The only thing wrong with him is that he has
mistakenly assumed false personalities that obscure the real one. A
thetan in good shape is supposedly able to drop dead, go to the
hospital of his choice, grab a baby’s body like a new pair of pants,
and know who he was just before he died. In a mind-bending loop,
Hubbard considered any personality in the mirror is a false
personality; that the basic personality is “you before you mocked
yourself up”, and that only through his technology could a man achieve
this lofty state of godhead.
Hubbard was well aware of how his premise would be viewed. In his own
words to doctorate course students in 1952:
It has never crossed
anybody’s mind to be a god. That would not be permitted, anywhere in
any literature, except somebody being insane and completely monomanic
and paranoid and all of the nasty words you could heap on it, because
the gods are too far above us for us to ever contact [...]88
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Granted, the definitions of soul and spirit
are variously delimited in the religions of the world; it is important
to note again that a fundamental, if not hidden reality in Scientology
is that one does not develop a relationship with a god—one is a god.
This can be further emphasized with the Scientology concept that as one
goes up the Bridge to Total Freedom, one can be more and more of each
dynamic, which of course includes the God Dynamic.
In Scientology, Hubbard is Source, and there is no other Source.
Whether he felt he was The Supreme Being is frankly irrelevant. In
Scientology there is no room for another god or God, despite rhetoric
to the contrary. He effectively overthrew, in the collective opinion of
Scientologists, all the archetypal images of humanity’s greatest
spiritual leaders, including Dharma <sic>, Krishna, Lao-Tse,
Gautama Buddha, Moses, Christ and Mohammed—he colored the banner black
and he took it up himself.89
It is not necessary to express the obvious hierarchal spiritual and
religious relationship the individual has with the organization of
Scientology and with Hubbard. That Hubbard is dead provides no relief
from this spiritual connection and hierarchy, as he too is “Immortal”.
His continued Scientology research and involvement was announced at his
memorial service.
This should also explain to the reader why it is that the myth of
Hubbard is so jealously and devotedly guarded and promoted, regardless
of incontrovertible evidence of the blatant lies contained within the
official version. The organization of Scientology knows it is
absolutely critical for its survival that Hubbard’s myth be kept alive.
If existing Scientologists were somehow gotten into a psychological
condition where they could be enlightened about the full truth of
Hubbard’s life and death, they would be permitted to come to terms with
the spiritual fraud that has been inflicted upon them and through them.
Their departure would cause Scientology to crumble. Scientology knows
that as soon as the person no longer sees Hubbard as a deity, as
Source, Scientology will not “work” for that person.
For the Scientologist, Hubbard accepted the onus for their God-Image.
No matter what the person’s original idea was about religion, he is
constantly herded into the viewpoint that Hubbard is the ultimate
authority for their spiritual freedom. The reader can fill in the rest
of the blanks if he wishes with the information contained in the
alleged OT 8 materials. However, the psychological premise of
transference stands, with or without the Anti-Christ argument in the
alleged OT 8 theory. A human god does not need religion—he needs
psychotherapy. What a person gets in Scientology is black
psychotherapy.
Hubbard himself was so wrapped up in his own psychotic inflation, that
he prescribed “Black Dianetics”to anyone who would try to destroy
Scientology.90 (Note: this reference will only be found in
an early version of the PDC lectures; later editions have been
sanitized.) Through transference and negative transference, the person
is tricked into believing that it is Scientology alone that can help
him; he has nowhere else to turn. He “knows” without question that
anyone who tries to dissuade him from Scientology, that person is an
enemy, not only to him, but also to Scientology and to mankind.
Hubbard was on an endlessly looping search for his own nature. But he
believed he was himself a god or God. He believed that he was the
Source and Creator of a new civilization, a new man, a new type of god,
and he projected into every Scientologist his rendition of his own
psychotic self. He was perpetually stuck in the duality of
Something/Nothing, and his message to the world was that he had found
Infinity, in the “Allness of the Nothingness” and the “Nothingness of
the Allness”. His “Clear” was only an admission, a statement of his own
insane meanderings. “You are mocking it all up.” He took every
Scientologist on a journey through his own sick mind.
Was Hubbard Scientology’s
First Illegal Preclear?91
The basis of Freud’s theory was that aberration of a sexual nature was
the cause of mental illness. Therefore, a Freudian analyst would be
concerned with exploring sexual undercurrents in any patient. Why did
Hubbard refer to “Commander Thompson” for his transference theory when
he had just completed a thorough review of Freudian analysis? Was
Commander “Snake” Thompson not Hubbard’s tutor, but his own therapist?
Or, could the Snake have been an inner therapist, yet another figment
of Hubbard’s overactive imagination, a play on the archetypal image of
the snake we see in the “S” of the Scientology symbol? Or, God help
him, could this occult symbol for “gnosis” be the banner under which he
intended to bring in the new Aeon?92
Hubbard makes no mention of any therapists with which he either trained
or consulted as a result of his research into Dianetics. Were the
“later analysts” he mentions in Pab 92 not analysts in general, but his
own therapists? Hubbard reportedly used hypnotism and narcosynthesis in
his Dianetics research days. Yet, there is no official Scientology
documentation regarding Hubbard’s degrees or qualifications in this
area. Surely those certificates would look impressive on his resume.
Could it be that he was applying his “thirty-five years of research
into the mind” from his perspective as the patient?
Affirmations admitted into evidence in the Armstrong trial that imply
Hubbard may have received some professional help for his masturbation
problem from the age of eleven. Hubbard’s affirmations show that his
mother was at least somewhat familiar with psychology.
Was she responsible for putting him in therapy? Certainly Hubbard’s
sexual difficulties extended through to the 1940’s, at the time of his
infamous affirmations.93 Did not Hubbard also request
psychiatric care of the VA in 1945?
Your mother’s theories
on psychology were wrong. They do not now affect you.94
— L. Ron
Hubbard
Could it actually be that Hubbard, in his
own deranged way, created Scientology to pray for his own incessant
suffering? Put into the framework of transference, it appears to me at
last: that within every bulletin he wrote lurks an admission of his
secret tool. Could it be that through projection into Scientologists he
desired to put a stop to that suffering for himself? What a prayer that
would be.
Summary
My experience in Scientology has taught me a few things. Not that these
came in any session, or any bulletin, or any lecture. It taught me the
three things that it didn’t want to teach me: I am not a god. I am a
human being. And Scientology is not a religion.
__________
1 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 26 May 1959 Man Who
Invented Scientology ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
2 Ibid.
3 Ibid.
4 Ibid.
5 Hubbard, L. Ron PAB 32 Why Doctor of Divinity?
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
6 Hubbard, L. Ron Dianetics The Modern Science
of Mental Health © 1992 L. Ron Hubbard Library
7 Ibid.
8 Hubbard, L. Ron Research and Discovery Series
1 © 1994 L. Ron Hubbard Library
9 Ibid.
10 Jung, Carl G. The Practice of Psychotherapy
© 1954 Bollingen Foundation Inc., New York, N.Y.
11 http://www.holysmoke.org/ga/admissions.pdf
12 Corydon, Bent L.Ron Hubbard, Messiah or
Madman? © 1987, 1992 by Bent Corydon
13 http://www.whatisscientology.org/Html/Part01/Chp03/pg0090.html
14 Hubbard, L. Ron HCOB 23 June 1959 What is
Scientology?
15 http://www.whatisscientology.org/Html/Part01/Chp02/pg0066.html
© 1996-2000 Church of Scientology International
16 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 5 June 1984R False
Purpose Rundown ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 26 April 1982 The Criminal Mind and the Psychs
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 6 May 1982 The Cause of Crime ©1991 L. Ron
Hubbard Library
Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 15 September 1981 The Criminal Mind ©1991 L.
Ron Hubbard Library
17 Ibid.
18 http://earley.org/Patterns/transference_and_countertransfer.htm
19 http://msnhomepages.talkcity.com/SupportSt/psychotherapyuk/trans/index.html
20 http://www.apa.org/ethics/code.html
21 Ibid.
22 a) Corydon, Bent L.Ron Hubbard, Messiah or
Madman? © 1987, 1992 by Bent Corydon
b) Miller, Russell, Bare-faced Messiah < ©? >:
http://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/~krasel/CoS/books/bfm/
c) Many other excellent Scientology critic web sites
23 Jung, Carl G. Psychological Types © 1971
Princeton University Press
24 Hubbard, L. Ron Modern Management Technology
Defined (def. “responsibility”) ©1976 L. Ron Hubbard
25 Hubbard, L. Ron 10 August 1982 OT Maxims
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
26 Hubbard, L. Ron Modern Management Technology
Defined (def. “command intention”) ©1976 L. Ron Hubbard
27 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 26 March 1965 Field
Staff Members © 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard
28 Hubbard, L. Ron Modern Management Technology
Defined (Definition of “Third Dynamic Triangle”) © 1976 by L. Ron
Hubbard
29 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 27 October 1964
Policies on Physical Healing, Insanity and Potential Trouble Sources
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
30 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 23 November 1969
Individuals vs. Groups ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
31 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 23 October 1965
Dissemination Drill ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
32 Hubbard, L. Ron HCOB 13 September 1967 Remedy
B,
Hubbard, L. Ron HCOB 12 May 1960, Help Processing ©1991 L. Ron
Hubbard Library
33 Hubbard, L. Ron Technical Bulletin of 22 July
1956 ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
34 Hubbard, L. Ron Hubbard Dissemination Course,
Chapter 8C and Circuits ©1986 Bridge Publications
35 Ibid.
36 Ibid.
37 Hubbard, L. Ron PDC 20 Formative State of
Scientology, Definition of Logic 6 December 1952 ©1986 L. Ron
Hubbard
38 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 5 November 1967 Critics
of Scientology ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
39 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 16 May 1965 Issue II
Indicators of Orgs ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
40 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 18 June 1968 Ethics
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
41 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 5 November 1967
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
42 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 18 June 1968 Ethics
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library,
Hubbard, L. Ron Certainty Vol 7 No. 2 Why Some Fight Scientology
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
43 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 27 September 1966 The
Anti-Social Personality The Anti-Scientologist ©1991 L. Ron
Hubbard Library
44 Hubbard, L. Ron, Introduction to Scientology
Ethics © 1998 L Ron Hubbard Library
45 Ibid.
46 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 22 July 1982 Knowledge
Reports ©1986 L. Ron Hubbard Library,
Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 1 May 1965 Staff Member Reports ©1986 L.
Ron Hubbard Library
47 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 29 March 1965 Staff
Regulations ©1986 L. Ron Hubbard Library
48 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 17 November AD14
Offline and Offpolicy Your Full In-Basket ©1986 L. Ron Hubbard
Library
49 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 10 November 1978RA
Proclamation Power to Forgive ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
50 Hubbard, L. Ron Pab 92 10 July 1956 A
Critique of Psychoanalysis ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
51 Hubbard, L. Ron Associate Newsletter #3,
Mid-May 1953 ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
52 Hubbard, L. Ron Associate Newsletter #3,
Mid-May 1953 ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
53 Hubbard, L. Ron Associate Newsletter #7, Late
July 1953 ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
54 Hubbard, L. Ron Self Analysis © 1989 L.
Ron Hubbard Library
55 Hubbard, L. Ron Pab 7 Mid-August, 1953
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
56 Hubbard, L. Ron Dianetics and Scientology
Technical Dictionary © 1983 New Era Publications
57 Ibid.
58 Hubbard, L. Ron HCOB 13 September 1967 Remedy
B ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library,
Hubbard, L. Ron HCOB 12 May 1960 Help Processing ©1991 L. Ron
Hubbard Library
59 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 23 April 1969
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
60 Hubbard, L. Ron History of Man © 1988 L.
Ron Hubbard Library
61 Hubbard, L. Ron A Step by Step Breakdown of
88 ca July 1952 ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
62 Hubbard, L. Ron Interiorization Rundown
Series, Tech Subject Volume 3. ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
63 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 22 April 1969 Somatics
and OTs ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
64 Hubbard, L. Ron Scientology 8-80 Chapter 17
©1989 L. Ron Hubbard Library,
Hubbard, L. Ron JOS Issue 17-G June 1952 The Limitations of Homo Novis
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
65 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 1 September 1991 Issue
XII The Fundamentals of the Grade Chart Saint Hill Special Briefing
Course Level L Checksheet ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
66 Hubbard, L. Ron PAB 7 mid-August 1953
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
67 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 7 May 1968R Upper Indoc
TRs ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
68 Ibid.
69 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 31 January 1979 Mood
Drills ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
70 Ibid
71 Hubbard, L Ron Science of Survival © The
Church of Scientology of California 1951 ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard
Library
72 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 25 September 1971RB
Tone Scale in Full ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
73 Hubbard, L Ron Science of Survival © The
Church of Scientology of California 1951
74 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 25 August 1982 The Joy
of Creating ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
75 Hubbard, L. Ron Science of Survival ©
1951 The Church of Scientology of California Publications Organization,
© 1989 L. Ron Hubbard Library
76 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO PL 14 October 1968RA The
Auditor’s Code ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
77 Hubbard, L. Ron Scientology: 88 (Handwritten)
©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
78 Ibid.
79 Hubbard, L. Ron JOS 1-G August 1952
Electronics Gives Life to Freud’s Theory ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard
Library
80 Hubbard, L. Ron Pab 83 8 May 1956 ©1991
L. Ron Hubbard Library
81 Hubbard, L. Ron, Introduction to Scientology
Ethics © 1998 L Ron Hubbard Library
82 Ibid.
83 Ibid.
84 © 1996-2000 Church of Scientology
International
85 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 4 June 1958 Running
Valences ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
86 Hubbard, L. Ron PDC Lecture 40 Games/Goals 12
December 1952 © 1978, 1986 by L. Ron Hubbard
87 Hubbard, L. Ron Scientology 0-8 © 1988
L. Ron Hubbard Library
88 Hubbard, L. Ron PDC Lecture 50 SOP: Spacation
Step III, Flow Processing, 16 December 1952
89 Hubbard, L. Ron Ability Minor 5 mid June 1955
The Hope of Man ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library
90 Hubbard, L. Ron PDC 20 Formative State of
Scientology, Definition of Logic 6 December 1952 ©1986 L. Ron
Hubbard
91 Hubbard, L. Ron HCO B 6 December 1976RB
Illegal PCs, Acceptance Of High Crime PL ©1991 L. Ron Hubbard
Library
92 Carter, John Sex and Rockets pg 106, 107
© 1999 John Carter and Feral House.
93 http://www.holysmoke.org/ga/admissions.pdf
<©? > Hubbard, L. Ron
http://carolineletkeman.org/sp/index.php?option=com_content&task=category§ionid=18&id=136&Itemid=174
94 Ibid.
© 2001 Caroline Letkeman
|
|